[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 37, Volume 1]
[Revised as of July 1, 1999]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
TITLE 37--PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, AND COPYRIGHTS
CHAPTER I--PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
PART 1--RULES OF PRACTICE IN PATENT CASES--Table of Contents
Subpart B--National Processing Provisions
Sec. 1.56 Duty to disclose information material to patentability.
(a) A patent by its very nature is affected with a public interest.
The public interest is best served, and the most effective patent
examination occurs when, at the time an application is being examined,
the Office is aware of and evaluates the teachings of all information
material to patentability. Each individual associated with the filing
and prosecution of a patent application has a duty of candor and good
faith in dealing with the Office, which includes a duty to disclose to
the Office
[[Page 40]]
all information known to that individual to be material to patentability
as defined in this section. The duty to disclose information exists with
respect to each pending claim until the claim is cancelled or withdrawn
from consideration, or the application becomes abandoned. Information
material to the patentability of a claim that is cancelled or withdrawn
from consideration need not be submitted if the information is not
material to the patentability of any claim remaining under consideration
in the application. There is no duty to submit information which is not
material to the patentability of any existing claim. The duty to
disclose all information known to be material to patentability is deemed
to be satisfied if all information known to be material to patentability
of any claim issued in a patent was cited by the Office or submitted to
the Office in the manner prescribed by Secs. 1.97(b)-(d) and 1.98.
However, no patent will be granted on an application in connection with
which fraud on the Office was practiced or attempted or the duty of
disclosure was violated through bad faith or intentional misconduct. The
Office encourages applicants to carefully examine:
(1) Prior art cited in search reports of a foreign patent office in
a counterpart application, and
(2) The closest information over which individuals associated with
the filing or prosecution of a patent application believe any pending
claim patentably defines, to make sure that any material information
contained therein is disclosed to the Office.
(b) Under this section, information is material to patentability
when it is not cumulative to information already of record or being made
of record in the application, and
(1) It establishes, by itself or in combination with other
information, a prima facie case of unpatentability of a claim; or
(2) It refutes, or is inconsistent with, a position the applicant
takes in:
(i) Opposing an argument of unpatentability relied on by the Office,
or
(ii) Asserting an argument of patentability.
A prima facie case of unpatentability is established when the
information compels a conclusion that a claim is unpatentable under the
preponderance of evidence, burden-of-proof standard, giving each term in
the claim its broadest reasonable construction consistent with the
specification, and before any consideration is given to evidence which
may be submitted in an attempt to establish a contrary conclusion of
patentability.
(c) Individuals associated with the filing or prosecution of a
patent application within the meaning of this section are:
(1) Each inventor named in the application;
(2) Each attorney or agent who prepares or prosecutes the
application; and
(3) Every other person who is substantively involved in the
preparation or prosecution of the application and who is associated with
the inventor, with the assignee or with anyone to whom there is an
obligation to assign the application.
(d) Individuals other than the attorney, agent or inventor may
comply with this section by disclosing information to the attorney,
agent, or inventor.
[57 FR 2034, Jan. 17, 1992]
37CFR1.97
TITLE 37--PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, AND COPYRIGHTS
CHAPTER I--PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
PART 1--RULES OF PRACTICE IN PATENT CASES--Table of Contents
Subpart B--National Processing Provisions
Sec. 1.97 Filing of information disclosure statement.
(a) In order for an applicant for a patent or for a reissue of a
patent to have an information disclosure statement in compliance with
Sec. 1.98 considered by the Office during the pendency of the
application, it must satisfy paragraph (b), (c), or (d) of this section.
(b) An information disclosure statement shall be considered by the
Office if filed by the applicant:
(1) Within three months of the filing date of a national
application;
(2) Within three months of the date of entry of the national stage
as set forth in Sec. 1.491 in an international application; or
(3) Before the mailing date of a first Office action on the merits,
whichever event occurs last.
(c) An information disclosure statement shall be considered by the
Office if filed by the applicant after the period specified in paragraph
(b) of this section, provided that the information disclosure statement
is filed before the mailing date of either a final action under
Sec. 1.113, or a notice of allowance under Sec. 1.311, whichever occurs
first, and is accompanied by either:
(1) A statement as specified in paragraph (e) of this section; or
(2) The fee set forth in Sec. 1.17(p).
(d) An information disclosure statement shall be considered by the
Office if filed by the applicant after the period specified in paragraph
(c) of this section, provided that the information disclosure statement
is filed on or before payment of the issue fee and is accompanied by:
(1) A statement as specified in paragraph (e) of this section;
(2) A petition requesting consideration of the information
disclosure statement; and
(3) The petition fee set forth in Sec. 1.17(i).
(e) A statement under this section must state either:
(1) That each item of information contained in the information
disclosure statement was cited in a communication from a foreign patent
office in a counterpart foreign application not more than three months
prior to the filing of the information disclosure statement; or
(2) That no item of information contained in the information
disclosure statement was cited in a communication from a foreign patent
office in a counterpart foreign application, and, to the knowledge of
the person signing the statement after making reasonable inquiry, no
item of information contained in the information disclosure statement
was known to any individual designated in Sec. 1.56(c) more than three
months prior to the filing of the information disclosure statement.
[[Page 56]]
(f) No extensions of time for filing an information disclosure
statement are permitted under Sec. 1.136. If a bona fide attempt is made
to comply with Sec. 1.98, but part of the required content is
inadvertently omitted, additional time may be given to enable full
compliance.
(g) An information disclosure statement filed in accordance with
this section shall not be construed as a representation that a search
has been made.
(h) The filing of an information disclosure statement shall not be
construed to be an admission that the information cited in the statement
is, or is considered to be, material to patentability as defined in
Sec. 1.56(b).
(i) Information disclosure statements, filed before the grant of a
patent, which do not comply with this section and Sec. 1.98 will be
placed in the file, but will not be considered by the Office.
[57 FR 2034, Jan. 17, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 32658, June 24, 1994; 60
FR 20226, Apr. 25, 1995; 61 FR 42805, Aug. 19, 1996; 62 FR 53190, Oct.
10, 1997]
37CFR1.98
TITLE 37--PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, AND COPYRIGHTS
CHAPTER I--PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
PART 1--RULES OF PRACTICE IN PATENT CASES--Table of Contents
Subpart B--National Processing Provisions
Sec. 1.98 Content of information disclosure statement.
(a) Any information disclosure statement filed under Sec. 1.97 shall
include:
(1) A list of all patents, publications, or other information
submitted for consideration by the Office;
(2) A legible copy of:
(i) Each U.S. and foreign patent;
(ii) Each publication or that portion which caused it to be listed;
and
(iii) All other information or that portion which caused it to be
listed, except that no copy of a U.S. patent application need be
included; and
(3) A concise explanation of the relevance, as it is presently
understood by the individual designated in Sec. 1.56(c) most
knowledgeable about the content of the information, of each patent,
publication, or other information listed that is not in the English
language. The concise explanation may be either separate from the
specification or incorporated therein.
(b) Each U.S. patent listed in an information disclosure statement
shall be identified by patentee, patent number and issue date. Each
foreign patent or published foreign patent application shall be
identified by the country or patent office which issued the patent or
published the application, an appropriate document number, and the
publication date indicated on the patent or published application. Each
publication shall be identified by author (if any), title, relevant
pages of the publication, date and place of publication.
(c) When the disclosures of two or more patents or publications
listed in an information disclosure statement are substantively
cumulative, a copy of one of the patents or publications may be
submitted without copies of the other patents or publications provided
that a statement is made that these other patents or publications are
cumulative. If a written English-language translation of a non-English
language document, or portion thereof, is within the possession, custody
or control of, or is readily available to any individual designated in
Sec. 1.56(c), a copy of the translation shall accompany the statement.
(d) A copy of any patent, publication or other information listed in
an information disclosure statement is not required to be provided if it
was previously cited by or submitted to the Office in a prior
application, provided that the prior application is properly identified
in the statement and relied upon for an earlier filing date under 35
U.S.C. 120.
[57 FR 2035, Jan. 17, 1992]