Notes on works by DC Meckler in reverse (approximate)
chronological order. Updated/revised December 2007.
b a c k to DC Meckler music
index page
piano solo, 2007
unspecified duration (no specified rhythms)
After composing a
great deal of music that has rhythm as its primary interest, I decided to
compose a piece that had no specified rhythms at all. This is a contemplation of piano voicings and it is also an
attempt to reclaim the major triad as a neutral sonority free of functional
tonal implications, a quixotic quest.
This piece is also a response to Gavin Borchert’s delightfully spare
piano piece Bosquejo, and it is dedicated to him.
First performance:
Jude Navari, Cañada College, Redwood City, California, 6 October 2007.
for
clarinet, cello, piano and percussion (drum set), 2007
about five minutes in duration
Program
note
Undercurrent
is a study of repetition, both of regular phrases and irregular fragments of
phrases. The undercurrent may be of
strangeness or normalcy.
Far
too many analytical comments
This
is one of my more explicable pieces, as I constructed it through very conscious
decisions. Most of my pieces are a bit
more mysterious to me.
The
piece was sketched out in about two hours, so it came very quickly. I think it is all in response to the pop
songwriting class I taught in the spring semester of 2007. I just have certain issues about
repetition. There is one extreme, the
normal classical to Brian Ferneyhough range, in which repetition is vital but
often disguised. At the other end,
there is minimalism. In between is pop
music. I can't bring myself to write a
genuine pop song because of the repetition issue I think.
This
is my "instrumental song" solution to the problem. Instead of repeating an idea AAB, I delay
repetition, ABB. This is a useful tool
that I am using more and more in my music.
Also, the two contrasting parts are of vastly different dimensions. The A idea is only three bars of 5/8. The B idea is a full-fledged eight bar
phrase, with two sub-phrases. (The
opening 19 bars of the piece could be considered ABCBC, if the sections are to
be of approximate equal dimension, but that is not how I thought of it.)
After
stating this 8-bar phrase twice, I then go to work on the second four bar
phrase (“C”), using a fragmentation and repetition technique. First I use 7/16. Then it gets interesting as a way of returning to the dimension
of the eight bar phrase. The piece
repeats a recent AMAZING discovery of mine that 11+9+7+5 = 32 = 4 X 8, so by
repeating the first 11 eighth notes worth of material twice, the next nine
twice, and so on, a four bar phrase maps into an eight bar 4/4 phrase or
section, although it has a sense of changing meter. The piece concludes with several statements of this technique,
and finishes with retrograde statements in canon.
The A
idea returns but is not really developed, only transposed and extended through
repetition.
I
thought it was an interesting mix of materials being transformed through simple
rules. The insistent
eighth-eighth-dotted quarter-dotted quarter rhythm of the B section keeps it
all rather coherent.
I have
rarely followed conscious rules of phrase construction, but this piece was a
deliberate exercise in that. To
construct the main material of the piece, the eight bar B phrase, I started
with a simple one measure idea.

The
spark behind this idea is probably from the Spanish world music fusion group
Ojos de Brujo. Something stimulated my
imagination about writing a bass line.
So my initial idea is an octave leap followed by a major seventh
fall. (A touch of a Spanish Phrygian
mode.) This sets up the primary
constructive tension for the entire phrase, large intervals versus small, the
big intervals of an octave and a seventh, but also the half step between D and
Eb. The last note of the measure leaps
up a major ninth, to F. The initial
idea is repeated with a slight variation, as the F is raised up to a G. The third measure scrambles the
materials. The half step is at the
beginning (A-Bb), then the leap, then the big fall, a major ninth. The fourth measure is a yet another
permutation of these basic elements. We
start with a falling octave, than a minor second, and then another minor
second. The materials are always
changing slightly, but the basic constituent element elements are always the
same.
![]()
To
construct the second four bar phrase, similar ideas are used. The first measure transposes the basic idea
up a half a step, to Eb, so on the large-scale of four measures, the harmonic
constituents relate very much to the small details of the first measure. The first measure extends the pattern of
growth, as the leap up is now a tritone plus an octave, so we've gone from sevenths,
octaves, ninths and tenths. For the
second measure, the pattern collapses back down to the ninth. The third measure very much parallels the
third measure of the first four bar phrase.
It starts up a perfect fourth, but instead of falling to the last note,
it rises up a minor third. The fourth
measure also is a parallel construction, except that the last interval is not a
minor second but a minor third.
![]()
This
minor third becomes a good marker.
Ending on G also sets up an interesting parallel when we return to the
first note of the entire eight bar phrase, D.
That falling perfect fourth is paralleled by the falling perfect fourth
at the end of the first four bar phrase connecting to the beginning of the
second bar phrase, (Ab-Eb). The two four
bar phrases each have a nice shape and the second four bar phrase has a
climactic note.
For
several years now I've been working on pieces of rhythmic complexity, but I
have been lacking in clearly motivated tempo changes. Staying in one tempo for the duration of a piece is sort of like
staying in the same key. I was very
happy to be able to gracefully incorporate a meaningful tempo change in this
piece.
If I
were to give labels to each section of the piece it would look like this:
Ø
the oracle/fanfare (5/8
idea)
Ø
the presentation of the
eight bar melody.
Ø
A repeat presentation
of the eight bar melody.
Ø
The return of the
oracle/fanfare
Ø
a development section
(the 7/16 idea applied to the second four bar phrase)
Ø
Punches
Ø
the development section
extended
Ø
A repeat of the
development section now featuring a drum solo, with punches
Ø
the return of the
oracle/fanfare
Ø
Piano solo -- new
material in a slower tempo that is soon flipped into double time. In the 7/16 idea.
Ø
At the golden mean of
the piece, a sort of recapitulation, a statement of the transformed second four
bar phrase (mapped into an eight bar phrase by repeating the 1st 5
eighth notes twice, the next 7 eighth notes twice, etc).
Ø
another version of
that, this time transposed, and the reverse pattern of fragmentation, 11+9+7+5.
Ø
the return of the
oracle/fanfare
Ø
yet another version of
the second four bar phrase mapped into an eight bar phrase (m 126), broken into
11+9+7+5 fragments.
Ø
yet another version of
the second four bar phrase mapped into an eight bar phrase, retrograde, broken
into 5+7+9+11 fragments. (m 134)
Ø
a statement in
retrograde and in canon.
Yet
another set of labels: a b c b c a c’ d
c’ c’’ e e’ e’ e’ c’’’ c’’’ a c’’’ c’’’ c’’’
Coming
up with the title:
"Undercurrent" was my original impulse. I liked it because it suggested that there
was something going on beneath the melodic, groovy surface. Then I thought of "Undercurrent
Construction" as a way of the reinforcing the notion of a hidden mechanism
generating music. I chose to go back to
the one-word title just out of simplicity.
piano solo, 2007
duration about 6 minutes
Rocinante is the hero's horse in
Cervantes’ Don Quixote. The Sonata
Rocinante is in four sections. The
first is Rocinante as described by Cervantes: lean (sparse), bony,
unpredictable and at times hesitant.
The second section is Rocinante as viewed by Don Quixote: muscular,
powerful, heroic. The third section
returns to the rhythmic trickiness of the opening; it is the game of the
writer. The fourth section returns to
the sweep of the second as it collects and integrates impressions of what has
gone before; it is the view of the reader.
1. The
Horse
2. The
Rider
3. The
Writer
4. The
Reader
The second section is marked "very flexible tempo with rubato." I do not think that is redundant. "Flexible tempo" means exactly that, and I use rubato in the traditional sense of freedom in the relationship between the two hands. A suggestion of the effect is already notated with the septuplets (mm. 51, 53 and 55), but I do not intend those to be rhythmically exact. Suppleness and fluidity should rule here. All metronome marks are general suggestions and may be adjusted.
The first section is Steve Reich
meets Haydn. The rhythmic spacing of
the repeated eighth notes follows a pattern of 3-4-5-4-3-2. This pattern is treated flexibly throughout
the piece. Within this section, simple
canons generate the material. The pitch
material comes from the superposition of major and minor triads (producing major
seventh chords) which is extended to the superposition of third- related seventh
chords in the final section.
The second section draws on a
12-tone row implied by the pitch materials of the first section. The left-hand plays one hexachord and the
melody, in octaves, plows through the complementary hexachord. Generally, pitch relationships are casual
and flexible.
The third section was created with
a technique I call "fragmented polyrhythm." I created a melodic line in 9/8.
The line itself has strong implications of a 3/2 polyrhythm.

To accompany the melody, I used a
4+3+5 pattern (at the level of sixteenth notes – itself highly ambiguous).

This source object (the melody
plus its repeated accompaniment figure) has its own rhythmic interest, but it
is only a starting point, as it serves as the basis for one more layer of
rhythmic manipulation. To develop it,
the object is repeated several times and then rebarred in 5/8. Each 5/8 bar is repeated once or more. That becomes the foreground of the music. It is sort of a cubist view of the underlying
musical object. You never quite get to
hear it straight:

The fourth section melds several
of the pitch and rhythmic ideas of the first three sections. I have chosen inconsistent notation for one
detail. At the very end (in measures
179 and 182) I notate dyads as G-D# and A #-C double sharp; earlier (measures
170 and 171) in a similar situation I notate those pairs as G-Eb and Bb-D. This is obviously eye music only, but I
think of the earlier example as two clashing tonalities and the final statement
as being resolved into one very bright tonality.
Each section presents material
that could be developed at greater length, but I chose to reflect the brevity
of most of the chapters in the novel.
Why “sonata”? This piece has more to do with the simple
forms of the Cage Sonatas and Interludes or Scarlatti, rather than
Beethoven. It also could be considered
as a four-movements-in one-movement sonata (just like Liszt!) -- motific first movement, lyrical second
movement, scherzo third movement, hybrid rondo variation form fourth
movement. Given the succinct duration,
perhaps “sonatina” would be more appropriate.
~~DC Meckler
. . . reading your history should move the
melancholy to laughter,
increase the joy of the cheerful, not irritate the simple,
fill the clever with admiration for its invention,
not give the serious reason to scorn it,
and allow the prudent to praise it.
Advice to the
"author" from a character in Don
Quixote, Edith Grossman translation, page 8.
b a c k to DC Meckler music
index page
medium
voice and piano, 2006
various durations; not intended to be performed as a complete cycle
Mining Song
c. 4 minutes, notated range D4-A5 (optional F5) (complete score pdf file)
Dust Light
c. 5 minutes, notated range C4-E5
The Dog Song (Fine Leaf Canine Guests)
c. 2 minutes, notated range Db4-E5
Imperative Song
less than a minute; a cappella, small range freely transposable
What Is Force?
c. 2 minutes, notated range D4-Eb5
Findings
c. 2 minutes, notated
range B3-G5
Masks
c. 3 minutes, notated range D4-G5
Cake Opinion
c. 2 minutes, notated range C4-F#5
Tin Can Island
c. 2 minutes, notated range C4-E5
The Albion Deity Thing
c. 8 minutes, notated range Db4-E5
(All songs may be
transposed. Any individual song may be
performed by itself and any selection of songs may be performed in any order.)
I
love setting text! Words have their own rhythmic and timbral life.
They are my friends and I want to play with them. But to find a text
worthy of setting that has space enough to be set, that overlaps enough with my
own worldview, that is hard! Not to mention issues of permission,
respecting the poet's intentions, and all that. So I created a pool of
potential song texts by reading German poetry into an English-language speech
dictation program. The results have
only the vaguest sense of sense, but much of the rhythm, assonance and
alliteration of the original is preserved.
For example, the program transcribed the spoken word input of
"Dichterliebe” as "an actor leaves." Even with this computer-generated text, I become charmed by the
near-sense it makes, and I am reluctant to change it too much. I edited the grammar as little as possible,
but I did replace some proper nouns and adjust subject and verb agreement, and
freely selected and rearranged the more interesting bits.
An
example text is "The Dog Song."
THE
DOG SONG (FINE LEAF CANINE GUESTS)
Dalton does in the dew,
the time boasts its own.
The laughs when we see a big lab
hold me engrossed in sod.
Canine today he got Monk's ass,
dust society's knock next mass;
dead as I was signed,
an ultraviolet hide of floss.
In
dome by state buildings, gold in them.
Malt cuts in my bins,
and fine leaf canine guests evolve;
fine leaf canine guests.
COMPLETE TEXTS and Additional Comments
Short Program Note
The Albion Deity Songbook sets
near nonsense texts that I created with an English-language speech dictation
program misinterpreting German poetry.
These texts are rich enough to give me musical ideas from their sounds,
rhythms and near meanings, and the songs are a playful investigation into relationships
between words and musical meanings.
Premiere Performances:
Mining
Song
Alexis Lane
Jensen and Sara Jobin, piano, First Unitarian
Universalist Church, San Francisco, CA, 14 April 2007
Dust
Light
Harriet March Page, Goat Hall, San Francisco, CA, June 22 & 24, 2007
The
Dog Song
Harriet March Page, Goat Hall, San Francisco, CA, June 22 & 24, 2007
Imperative Song
Meghan Dibble, Goat Hall, San Francisco,
CA, June 22 & 24, 2007
What Is Force?
Meghan Dibble, Goat Hall, San
Francisco, CA, June 22 & 24, 2007
Tin
Can Island
Meghan Dibble, Goat Hall, San
Francisco, CA, June 22 & 24, 2007
The Albion Deity Thing
Harriet March Page, Goat Hall, San Francisco, CA, June 22 & 24, 2007
Cake
Opinion
Meghan Dibble, Cañada College,
Redwood City, California, 6 October 2007
Masks
Meghan Dibble, Cañada College,
Redwood City, California, 6 October 2007
theater
piece for 4 actors with incidental music; synthesized audio recording;
performable by 3 clarinetists (2006)
premiere performances: directed by Linda Hoy;
Cañada College Flexible Theater, Redwood City, California, 23 March - 1 April,
2006
piano
solo, 2005, 2 pages
duration about 3 minutes
A
moody depiction of a gently restless sleepless night. A subtle 2 v. 3
pervades the rhythm as the pitches, in particular orders, pass by, although the
piece owes more to Thelonius than to Arnold. (It is a very simple, even
naive, 12-tone piece for the most part.)
The piece was initially created for a dance production, House:
Stability/Fragility, and was intended to depict sleepless hours troubled by
the recurring worries of adults, as compared to the nightmares of children.
First
performance: Ann Yi, Cañada College, Redwood City, California, 6 October 2007
for medium voice
and piano, 2005
(written vocal range C3-G4; may be transposed)
duration about 5 minutes
Shakespeare's Sonnet 51
Thus can my love excuse the slow offense
Of my dull bearer, when from thee I speed ––
From where thou art, why should I haste me thence?
Till I return, of posting is no need.
O what excuse will my poor beast then find,
When swift extremity can seem but slow?
Then should I spur, though mounted on the wind ––
In winged speed no motion shall I know.
Then can no horse with my desire keep pace;
Therefore desire, a perfect'st love being made,
Shall neigh, no dull flesh in his fiery race,
But love, for love, thus shall excuse my jade ––
Since from thee going he went wilful slow,
Towards thee I'll run, and give him leave to go.
Program note for Speed
No Motion
Speed No Motion is a setting of
Shakespeare's Sonnet 51. The poem
concerns the infinitely fast desire of a lover riding a horse with finite
speed. This is particularly evident in
the line, “In winged speed no motion shall I know.” Musically, this idea is translated into somewhat static harmony
(limited, except at the very end, to six pitches that allow C minor, Eb minor
and Gb major triads, and there is a frequently present Bb pedal) and a
constantly shifting sense of meter. The
piano part serves as a somewhat uncooperative steed to the vocal line. The vocal part is generally in familiar
meters such as 4/4 or 6/8, but the piano part consists of fragments of unusual
polyrhythms. At the end, when the lover
gives his horse “leave to go,” the piano part is dismissed as well.
percussion (3) and piano, 2005
duration: between 3-4 minutes
Percussion
1: damped cowbell, suspended cymbal, bass drum (kick drum)
Percussion
2: high woodblock or clavé
Percussion
3: Vibraphone
The
manuscript was discovered in an imaginary tunnel connecting Cuba and the
Balkans. The first section is in 5+5+4;
the short beat becomes the long beat in the next section, which is in
4+4+3. The idea repeats, reaching 3+
3+2 in the middle section. The process
reverses and the piece ends back in 5+5+4.
Sort of a Gary-Burton-like tune.
It is an essay in metric, not tempo, modulation, and it is very cute and
groovy.
First
performance: Adesso (Luanne Warner, Rick Kvistad, and John Burgardt,
percussion, Josephine Gandolfi, piano), Old First Church, San Francisco, CA, 17
Feb 2006
audio recording on CD; performable by percussion (2) and piano (2), 2005
duration: about 19 minutes
Music for HOUSE: Stability/Fragility was composed by DC Meckler in close
collaboration with choreographer Diana Evans Cushway. The overall work is
a non-narrative dance theater piece that includes texts written by Skyline
College students working with poet Katherine Harer.
Premiere performances: The Skyline College Dance Ensemble's 2005 Spring
Dance Concert, 5-6 May.
tenor
voice and piano, 2005
texts by Robinson Jeffers
Duration: each piece about 6 minutes; about 12 minutes total.
May be performed as independent pieces.
Vocal ranges (sounding): Shine,
Perishing Republic, D3 - B4;
Shine, Republic, C3 - B4
(B4 including falsetto; A4 full voice)
Shine, Republic may be transposed to suit the performer’s
interpretation.
The
texts are from The Collected Poetry of Robinson Jeffers, edited by Tim
Hunt, copyright © 1938, renewed 1966 by Donnan Jeffers and Garth Jeffers, and
are used with the permission of Stanford University Press, www.sup.org.
The
two settings are rather different in personality. The first, Shine, Perishing Republic, is consistently
organized with a melodic motive, but is rather rhapsodic and episodic in its
continuity. Shine, Republic is a
single texture with smaller details of text painting confined to the vocal
line. Both settings set off their last
lines by a change in texture; the texture of the second piece is suggested by
the closing texture of the first piece, tying the two works together. The
poetry of Robinson Jeffers is not known for its optimism, but “Shine, Republic”
is a slightly more hopeful poem than its predecessor, “Shine, Perishing
Republic.” The earlier poem ends with a
reference to “the trap that catches [the] noblest spirits,” and so in the
setting of the second poem, the singer soars above a rhythmic cage in the
accompaniment, evading, maybe even transcending, the trap. The rhythmic cage consists of repeated
fragments from a large polyrhythmic structure.
It has touches of both barbarism and civilization, neither a good thing
in Jeffers’ cosmos.
Technical comment on the rhythmic process for Shine,
Republic
I first created a polyrhythmic structure of seven against four (seven 16th
notes against four 16th notes). The
seven pattern is a minor triad in second version, and this pitch material never
changes. The four pattern is a single
note in the bass line. Putting this
pattern in 5/4 meter, I then simply applied a descending scale pattern to the
bass note. This structure was then
fragmented by taking the first 10 eighth notes of duration and repeating it,
the next nine eighth notes of duration and then repeating it twice, the next
eight three times, etc. I then ran the
process in reverse, from two up to 12 eighth notes. This structure then was rebarred in 4/4, and the melody projects
that meter.
First
performance: 21 May 2006, Alec
Jeong, tenor, Keisuke Nakagoshi, piano; Fresh Voices VI Festival, Goat Hall
Productions, Thick House, San Francisco.
two
pianos, 2004
in six movements; duration about 14 minutes
movements 3 (duration about three minutes) and 5 (duration about two minutes)
can be played as independent pieces
LOUD
MUSIC is the inverse of a Baroque suite –– instead of six movements in
contrasting meters and in the same key, the six movements of LOUD MUSIC are all
in the same meter (7/4) and are harmonically quite free. The initial impulse behind composing LOUD
MUSIC was to create some background music for myself while I puttered around
the house –– I wanted the pulse of rock, but with a few more twists, turns and
formal surprises. The occasional
appearance of a straight quarter-note pulse is certainly an idea lifted from
Balinese gamelan gong kebyar. (I enjoy LOUD MUSIC, but my studio is no
more tidier, so while LOUD MUSIC energizes my puttering, I cannot claim that it
boosts house-cleaning effectiveness.)
(two
versions)
SA chorus, two horns, harp, piano, 2004
SATB chorus, two horns, harp, piano, 2004
duration: c. 11 min.
text by Robinson Jeffers
In
most of his poetry, Robinson Jeffers manifests a clear preference for nature
over humanity. The irony or paradox of
his poem "Natural Music" is that if one listens through humanity's
noise to the voice of nature, the voice one hears is one described in human
terms. The irony is reflected on
several levels of my setting of this poem.
The opening texture, a polluted green-black harmony, accompanies a
simple diatonic melody. A key line of
the poem, "divisions of desire and terror," might refer to the
churning polyrhythms or chromatic intervals, those chosen divisions of the
octave––these divisions desired by the composer, and one hopes not a terror to
the performer.
The
instrumentation was suggested by the Brahms piece for women's chorus, horns and
harp. I performed one of the horn parts
for that piece in the 1980s, so the combination was long in my mind. Also on my list of compositional desires was
to write a piece for the fine voice of my wife. This poem was a natural for these musical desires. Using the untempered harmonic series on the
horn certainly seems to be a representation of the "natural." The harp too seems somehow natural next to
that black beast of 19th-century technology, the piano. This piece contains "artificial"
atonal structures, the natural, unmediated harmonic series (physics singing
itself!), and that cultured middleground, the (tempered) diatonic scale. Much like the poem itself, this piece is a
two-eyed look at humanity––hunger-smitten cities, yes, but also individuals
that love. I wrote this piece without a
commission or any immediate hope for performance. I wrote it to reflect on some
of the emotional extremes of the day, from the news of our violent political
worlds to the much happier and much more private world of delight in my
marriage. That phrase, "divisions
of desire," seems to resonate with the mood of today. We have divisions that we desire (choices of
intervals and rhythms) and we are divided by our different desires, the driving
engines of political conflict that lead to terror.
"I will open my dark saying on the
harp." Psalms 49:4.
Short
program note: Natural Music
represents various kinds of natural and human music through contrasts of instruments
and voices, and atonal and modal music.
Within the instruments, raw nature might be represented by the natural
harmonic series on the horns, a pastoral, humanized nature might be associated
with the harp, and the piano could represent civilization and its
complexities.
Premiere
performances:
14, 15 & 22 May 2005, in Oakland, San Francisco and Berkeley. Voci
Women's Vocal Ensemble; Heather Heise, piano; Erin Vang & Beth Milne,
horns; Dan Levitan, harp; Jude Navari, cond. Performances supported in
part through Subito, the quick advancement grant program of the San Francisco
Bay Area Chapter of the American Composers Forum.
2
soprano voices & piano; no text; 2004
duration: about 3 1/2 minutes
could also be performed by any combination of flute, oboe, or clarinet
(clarinet & oboe, 2 flutes, etc.)
This
piece develops the diatonic melody later used in Natural
Music. It is a study in imitative counterpoint and in balancing
atonal and diatonic pitch material.
SA
chorus, piano, 2004
duration: c. 5 min.
Written
for Jude Navari and the Voci women's chorus
While
this piece does not use the text from the poem, it was inspired by the
frequently anthologized Robinson Jeffers poem, "To the
Stone-cutters." Although poet
Robinson Jeffers has a generally bleak view of humanity's fate in the world, he
does take minor solace in some small acts of human culture. In terms of the age of the universe, both
before and after humanity's existence, we humans have not been around for long,
nor will we be, yet "stones have stood for a thousand years." Our ultimate impermanence is not of
immediate concern, especially when we realize that "immediate" can be
defined in terms of centuries. This is
not paradox; it just reflects Jeffers' unusually long historical
perspective. My own bit of ephemeral
stonecutting is to etch various pitches in time. The poem refers to the solace that comes from old poems; I
certainly enjoy the solace to be found in "To the
Stone-cutters." However, since
many of the lines have such a strong music of their own ("eat cynical
wages") I would have difficulty choosing a setting for them. In Wind & Stone, I chose to set
not the words but one of the ideas of the poem, that of the elements of nature
weathering and wearing away our words and works. Aleatoric effects are mixed with precise rhythms; the meter
consistently alternates between 9/8 and 3/4, to suggest the expanding and
contracting of the stone in response to heating and cooling by days, nights,
and seasons.
Short
program note: Rather than setting the text of the Robinson Jeffers poem
"To the Stone-cutters," Wind & Stone elaborates on one of
the images in the poem––the elements weathering away carved stone.
Premiere
performances:
14, 15 & 22 May 2005, in Oakland, San Francisco and Berkeley. Voci
Women's Vocal Ensemble; Heather Heise, piano; Jude Navari, cond.
Performances supported in part through Subito, the quick advancement grant
program of the San Francisco Bay Area Chapter of the American Composers Forum.
solo
piano, 2004
Stonecutter
Old Poems
duration:
each piece, c. 4 min.
These
pieces are a musical response to the frequently anthologized Robinson Jeffers
poem, "To the Stone-cutters."
Some of the response is general–– Stonecutter etches pitches in
time; some of it can be interpreted as rather specific. It would not be too much of a stretch to
connect the group of dark pounding chords with the thought that the sun will
"die blind and blacken to the heart." Both Stonecutter and Old Poems use a consistently
alternating 9/8 - 3/4 meter. Old
Poems is an interesting combination of polyrhythm with that 9/8 - 3/4
expanding and contracting meter. The
pieces may be played separately.
for vioin, cello,
piano, 2003, 42 pages.
2 movements, about 21 min.
I. A Hazardous Similar Harmony
II. Dust & Desire
Analytical background notes for performers
Meter
The meter is a consistent 12/8 grouped in a 3 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 2 throughout both
movements. (The opening 42 bars of the second movement has been re-barred in a regular
3/4 as a sanity-preserving tactic, but the underlying music follows the 3 + 2 +
3 + 2 + 2 pattern.) This large measure is sometimes felt as 5/8 + 7/8;
alternatively, it is sometimes grouped as 8/8 + 2/4.
Pitch
The harmonic environment for the piece is generated by E major, C major and F
minor triads. These do not function in a given order, with an implied
progression in one horizontal dimension (a.k.a. "time"). Instead,
these three triads are associated with particular registers: F minor (low
register), C major or minor (middle register) and E major (high register). This
approach is loosely based on three ideas. [1] Arab music, as it modulates from
mode to mode does not just change pitch and interval content; register is an
implied part of the Arab modal system. [2] A very loose interpretation of the
idea of "spectral" music, music that uses compositional materials and
methods based on on extremely detailed studies of acoustics and interactions in
the harmonic series. The stack of F minor (low register), C major (middle
register) and E major (high register) forms a synthetic or altered harmonic
series. Somewhat related to this pseudo-spectral approach is the notion of [3]
prolongation. Having long resisted the Schenkerian interpretation of tonal music,
I have to admit that I am beginning to hear some pieces, particularly Brahms
& Chopin, in this way. Or at least some pieces seem to explore the
registral resonances of some grand fundamental vibration, some deep Ur-Klang
unique to each piece. I have not been a slave to this E/C/F system, only
generally following the general nature of it. These ideas served as some of the
input to the piece; the outcome may of course be quite differently perceived by
a listener.
One
practical consequence of this harmonic environment is the structural opposition
between the pitch classes of G and G#, as well as the alternative spellings of
G# and Ab.
The
proto-origins of the piece may not have made it far enough into the piece that
they would be apparent to the listener, but they do inform some of my pitch
choices. My first consideration about a piano trio is that to the instruments,
violin and cello, can play to the perfectly in tune, while the piano, with its
equal-temperament, has this forever compromised tuning. (I would think that in
a piano quintet, this ought to be less of a problem, because the four string
instruments probably have enough vibrato going on to provide a sufficiently
deep bath of micro-tuning.) Some just-tuning advocates claim that the
equal-tempered piano sounds awful to them. I do not feel that way, but since
listening to lots of world music, I do hear equal-temperament as arbitrary;
lovely, yes, but arbitrary, a grand compromise between Culture and Nature. So I
began thinking of the two sources of materials for the piece being perfect
fifths from natural harmonics and the fifths of the strings of the violin and
cello, and those approximate major thirds of the piano, exemplified by one of
the more ugly sounds in music, the augmented triad. Choosing the highest string
of the higher instrument, the violin's E string, and the lowest string of the
lower instrument, the cello's C string, accounts for the high-register and
mid-register triads as well as the C-E-G# augmented triad. To bring the system
together, the pseudo-fundamental, F, is supplied a fifth below by the piano.
The unadorned origins of the piece are on display in the interlude in the
middle of the first movement, and further discussion is in the interlude in the
second movement.
Form
The form in both movements is basically ABCABC. In more detail, it is
A-B-C-interlude-A'-B'-C', in which the theme group returns are developed,
condensed or expanded, and the interludes of both movements are similar
material. The variation/alteration is much more pronounced in the second
movement.
10/24 June 2003
Premiere
performances of the first movement:
The
Picasso Ensemble: Susan Brown, violin, Karen Andrie, cello, Josephine
Gandolfi, piano
Sunday,
April 25, 2004, Sesnon House at Cabrillo College
Saturday, May 1, Palo Alto Arts Center
for
viola, cello, piano, 2 perc, 2003, 26 pages.
4
movements, about 23 min.
Chocolate Prelude
audio demo 3.2 MB wma This synthesized demo
substitutes an organ sound for the viola and cello parts. (I dislike most
string samples!)
I. Chocolate Prelude c. 4 min
II. The Permanence of Gardens c. 5 min
III. Compost-modernism c. 8 min
IV. Balances Upon The Leaves c. 6 min
This Quintet starts off
with groovy feel-good harmony (Chocolate
Prelude) and concludes with a quiet but intense meditation that dissolves
the metric and pitch systems of the piece (Balances
Upon the Leaves). Each movement has
a moment of quiet or at least stillness, and these culminate in the fourth
movement. Those moments of stillness
are framed throughout the piece by a consistent metrical pattern in 14/8. Any meter is of course a rickety bridge or
structure trying to span but only floating on time. And that constructedness is fundamentally what the piece is
about. The second movement is entitled The Permanence of
Gardens. Of course, gardens are
anything but permanent. Their forms may
persist, but they require tending and active human engagement. Perhaps the rhythmic form and pitch-space
structure of this piece are the permanent (humanly constructed, so not so
permanent) aspects of this garden, and it is the duty of the violist to tend to
the sound quality of each note . . . the listener's attention is also needed for
the piece to be fully realized. The
third movement, Compost-modernism,
is intended as a humorous scherzo, but bringing different styles and musical
textures into close proximity is also a way of pointing out the contingency of
those ideas. In Balances Upon the Leaves, the rhythm patterns are stretched out
past the meter, and it collapses; the strings are de-tuned but play natural
harmonics, so the intervallic content is contingent on physics and not so much
on culture.
for SATB chorus, piano
4-hands, 2002, 17 pages.
also available for SATB
chorus with string orchestra
text by the composer
about 5 min.
When I was a
child, every three months or so my father would begin conversation at the
dinner table with the question, "Davey, what day it is today?" The right answer (rarely given) would have
been, "It's the Solstice" or, "It's the Equinox." Definitions and explanations would
follow. Solstice Carol pays homage
to that family memory as well as the geophysical reason for the seasons. The piece also alludes to somewhat older
cultural patterns that are the origins of today's carol traditions. The
text for the carol is here. I will also
arrange a brass accompaniment one of these seasons . . .
After spending years composing Apollo 14, I felt a great sense of
relief when I connected all the dots and had a continuous piece of music. To celebrate, I decided I would compose a
completely irresponsible piece of music, one that had no obligations of
harmonic or melodic consistency or even stylistic coherence, and one that I
could knock out in a few hours. Conversation
Piece was the result. I did decide
that the one move toward consistency or coherence would be to use a 9/8 3+2+2+2
meter throughout. I found this to be a
lot of fun as I veered from style to style, and I began to wonder why Brahms
and other 19th century composers (or even Bach!) did not use asymmetrical
meters. Thus began a series of short
studies in meter with wide-ranging approaches to style. It occurred to me that in the years of
composing Apollo 14 material, I never thought to write in 14/8. I suppose I rejected that as being inaudible
numerology. Several pieces in 14/8 soon
followed:
My Bundled Dances, in 2+2+3+2+3+2, is
playable as it stands, but it would be a promising candidate for an arrangement
for piano 4-hands. The tempo of the fast
sections in this synthesized demo (3.8 MB, wma) is
several clicks faster than any human ever need play the piece.
AABA,
in 3+2+2+2+3+2,
is a brief study in this wonderful and therefore common form, juxtaposing and
repeating several small ideas. A
detailed view of the form would be abcd abcd eeee abcd (synthesized demo, 2 MB, wma). The repeats are often exact, but there are some
small variations in some details. This
is somewhat inspired by common Native American approaches to repetition and
micro-variation in music.
Quintet, described elsewhere on this webpage, is again
in 14/8, and all four movements are 3+2+3+2+2+2. An audio
demo (3.2 MB, wma) of the first movement is available.
I have continued working with asymmetrical meters in my Piano Trio
(12/8 consistently divided into 3+2+3+2+2 in both movements) and Two Pieces After a Poem. The first of the Two Pieces After a Poem, Stonecutter,
begins with a 6/8 introduction but soon establishes a 15/8 3+3+3+2+2+2 (synthesized demo, 3.6 MB, wma). The second piece in the set, Old Poems, is also in 15/8, but with a
2+2+2+3+3+3 pattern. (The poem referred
to by the title is "To the Stonecutters" by Robinson Jeffers.)
for SATB chorus, alto
flute, percussion (marimba, Vibraphone), piano, 2002, 17 pages.
text by Lordes Sian
about 6 min.
Black Cat was created through the Poetry and
Music at Skyline Project. This project
selected three professional composers to set poetry written by Skyline College
students. The program was organized by
the Creative Writing Program and the Creative Arts and Social Sciences
Department. Conductor Patricia Hennings
conceived the idea and got it started, in cooperation with Katherine Harer of
the Skyline College English Department.
The process started for
me when I received a pound and a half of poetry in the mail. After reading through the pile, I selected
about 10 poems for my short list, but almost immediately I settled on
"black cat," based on its mood and musical qualities. The poet, Lordes Sian, is also a member of
the Skyline College Choir. Commissioned by Skyline College with
support from the Lane Family Charitable Trust, the Skyline College Partnership
for Excellence, and the Skyline College President's Innovation Fund.
First
Performance:
4
May 2002, Skyline College Theater, San Bruno, CA. Skyline College Choir, Jim Yowell, director, Dawn Walker, flute,
Ward Spangler, percussion, Richard Rogers, piano.
Program note
Many of the ideas in the piece Black Cat come from
the poem "black cat" by Lourdes Sian. A primary image is that of a melodic line that 'wends' from
section to section of the chorus.
Anything that wends suggests chromatic movement to me, and since it is a
black cat, I think dark, complex harmony is called for. A good way to manage highly chromatic
complex harmony is to use a now antique system of composition from the
20th-century, serialism. The choral
parts are in general not ordered by any 12-tone row, since cats are not known
for following rules. The dodecaphonic
material is mostly in the accompanying parts.
This is my second serial piece, and the first to use the gamut of serial
tricks: symmetrical hexachords, M5 mappings, rotations, etc. Another musical resource that is found in
the accompaniment is a musical gesture that rises and falls (or falls and
rises) according to the contour and rhythm of a motive from Bach's Magnifi-cat. (The Skyline College Choir performed the
Magnificat in their previous concert.)
This musical idea switches back on itself or forms a gully, depending on
its orientation. The key sonority for
the piece comes from the "bell ringer" melody and the harmony that
sets up that melody.
“black cat” is a very fine poem that has great
attention to the sounds of the words, creating a coherent and consistent
sound-world with the words in the poem.
It also suggests movement.
"You wend your way" suggests a downward motion; "you're
the bell ringer" rises; "you are immersed" falls; and "you
reach" again rises.
The poem:
black cat
you wend your way
through purple irises
and red-lipped montebellos
through switchbacks
found in a new made gully