In March I entered a contest sponsored by American Airlines entitled
“Why You Fly” in which entrants were required to create videos,
photos, or writing telling a story as to why they fly. My entry won the
grand prize in the video category. The prize consisted of twelve flights
for two people from any American to city to any worldwide destination
that American Airlines services. The flight vouchers would have to be
used within one year or forfeited. Upon my notification of the prize,
I was very excited, as my wife and I love to travel, and have done so
frequently on American Airlines. I had worked hard creating my video entry,
and I felt that my work had been justly rewarded.
However, when I received the winner’s package, I noticed some fine
print that indicated that I would be issued a 1099 form for the “full
retail value” of the prize, and that I would be required to pay
all federal, state, and local taxes on that value. This concerned me greatly
as American Airlines had indicated that the retail value of this prize
was $52,800. I spoke to my tax accountant and a representative of the
company, Shamrock Industries, that organized the contest, and confirmed
that I would have to pay tax on $52,800 as if it were income that I had
received.
I was shocked, to say the least. I did the math, and determined that my
tax liability on this prize, between federal, state, and local taxes,
would be somewhere between $15,000 and $23,000, depending on my other
income for the coming year. I know it’s the law that taxes must
be paid on winnings, and this certainly makes sense where winnings are
in cash, or are items that can be sold if necessary to cover the taxes.
However, in this case, I would not be able to sell the flight vouchers,
and even if I was, I can’t imagine anyone who would be willing to
pay $2200 for a restricted economy ticket. Yet this is what American Airlines
has valued each flight voucher at.
I spoke to the representative from Shamrock Companies, who indicated to
me that American came up with this valuation based on a “worst case
scenario” price. I explained to him that it was highly unlikely
that I would be able to use all, if in fact, any of the vouchers to fly
to exotic destinations. Due to the one year time limit, there is no way
that I could get the time off for 12 such trips in such a short time,
let alone pay the ancillary costs of the trips. Most likely, the majority
of the tickets would be used to fly domestic short hops to places such
as Miami or Chicago to visit friends. This is where American’s valuations
become absurd. On American’s Web site, a ticket to Chicago costs
approximately $200 including airport taxes. Yet, if I were to use one
of these vouchers to fly to Chicago, I would be required to pay income
tax on $2200. This could amount to approximately $1000 out of my pocket
in taxes for a ticket worth $200. Not a very good deal, especially when
you consider that I would also have to pay airport taxes on top of this.
Shamrock told me that I would be responsible for paying taxes on American’s
“full retail value” no matter where I used the vouchers to
fly, and even if I only used some - or none - of them. I explained to
them that it seemed outrageous to me that, should I accept this prize,
I would be required to come up with an amount in the vicinity of $20,000
to pay taxes on money which I never even received. I asked them if, instead
of the flight vouchers I could be given a cash reward, or if American
Airlines would lower their valuation to a more reasonable amount. American
refused to do anything to make this prize actually worthwhile. They do
not seem to understand the absurdity of the valuation they have used.
The best they could do was to offer me fewer flight vouchers, but each
flight would still be at the inflated valuation of $2200. I explained
that paying $1000 in tax on one flight is proportionally just as bad as
paying that amount for twelve, so in fact they haven’t offered an
effective solution, but my appeals have fallen on deaf ears.
My wife and I have been frequent fliers on American Airlines for many
years, and thus are outraged that American made no attempt to offer anything
of value. I now question the company’s motivation in sponsoring
such a competition which seriously misleads winners into thinking they
will receive a great prize when the reality is that they receive no net
benefit. I have written a letter to American Airlines’ CEO and to
their customer relations department, but I suspect that this will do nothing.
I have also sent my story to over 20 TV stations and newspapers in the
hope that, at the very least, I can generate some deserved negative publicity
for American Airlines.
Jack |