WHY I AM RUNNING FOR REELECTION
Like many people who move to
However, in the early 1990’s, it was becoming apparent
that our schools and other services were becoming seriously under-funded. We
needed either to find ways to provide services more efficiently or increase
funding or both. I volunteered to serve on the Financial Planning Advisory
Committee (FPAC) and was chosen by the Selectmen to be co-chair.
FPAC was charged with reviewing all aspects of the
Town’s financial and administrative structures and to make recommendations for
changes in our financial practices, areas where efficiencies could be achieved
and, if necessary, for the structure of a Proposition 2˝ override. The
committee met regularly for five months and made recommendations in all three
areas. The Selectman placed on the ballot an override similar to the one we
recommended. I worked with other
political leaders to present the override to the voters, and in May 1994 it was
passed by the voters.
Shortly after that, Nancy Heller, the chair of the
John Hodgman who chaired the
School Committee’s finance sub-committee announced that he would not seek
reelection when his term ended in 1996. Several members of the School Committee
believed that my background in economics and knowledge of municipal finance
would be valuable to the Committee and urged me to run.
Upon my election, I became Chair of the finance
sub-committee. I used my expertise to help the Schools and the Town make better use of state funding and develop better capital
policies. But my fellow Committee members soon realized that I was passionate
about a number of issues. An account of my positions and role in the major
issues during my first few years on the Committee can be found here.
In brief, I championed ongoing program review for all programs, allowing
students and parents to determine the level (standard, honors, advanced
placement) of the courses students take at the high school rather than allowing
teachers to exclude students from more challenging courses, and revising the
health/physical education program to relieve the time burden on student
athletes. You can find more information on the positions I have taken by
clicking on “speeches and older documents” on the menu to the left. You can
learn more about my positions on current issues by clicking on “Policy
statements” on the same menu.
There are a number of issues and concerns that have
pushed me to seek reelection this time. The first is that we still need to
solidify the process of program evaluation. During my first two terms, we evaluated
most of our programs over a three-year period. While we learned a great deal
from the process, there were also significant shortcomings in the way we
undertook evaluation. After a two year hiatus, we began developing an improved
evaluation process two years ago. This year, we are beginning the first round
of the new evaluations, starting with mathematics and the gifted and talented
program. I still have concerns about our evaluation process. As a professional researcher
engaged in program evaluation, I want to work with the school administration to
continue to refine what I believe is an essential element of a process of
continuous improvement.
My second major reason for running is that I want to
ensure that we maintain the necessary support, both political and financial,
for
Finally, we are in a period where having experienced
School Committee members is going to be unusually important. If I chose not to
run, the majority of the new School Committee would be members serving in their
first term and working with a Superintendent who arrived in
I offer you my passion, my experience and my academic
expertise and would very much appreciate your support on May 3.