
What Dying People Want
BEING
TOUCHED, BEING IN TOUCH
by David Kuhl, M.D.
What is the significance of human
contact, of touch? In an interview with Bill Moyers in 1993, Rachel Remen,
a doctor who has been working for more than twenty years with people who
have terminal illnesses, and the author of Kitchen
Table Wisdom and My
Grandfather's Blessings, begins to answer that question. She speaks of
touching as a way of healing. She acknowledges that we don't touch each
other a lot and, when we do, that it's often misunderstood or sexualized.
Physicians are taught that they should touch people only to make a
diagnosis: If they touch their patients in any other way, even as a means
of comforting them, it might be misunderstood. As Bill Moyers writes,
"Touch is deeply reassuring and nurturing. It's the first way a
mother and child connect with each other . . . what a mother is saying to
her child with that touch is 'Live . . . your life matters to me.' Remen
also describes how people with cancer often feel when they're touched by
health care providers. They say they feel as though they are merely a
'piece of meat.' She reports that one woman said, 'Sometimes when I go for
my chemotherapy, they touch me as if they don't know anybody's inside the
body.'"
Remen now works with adults who have
cancer. Earlier in her career she was the associate director of pediatric
clinics at Stanford Medical School. During
her time there, one of her colleagues, Marshall Klaus, chief of the
intensive care nursery, conducted a study to explore the effect of touch
on infants so small they could be held in one hand. Half the infants were
touched (gently rubbing the baby's back with a pinkie finger) for fifteen
minutes every few hours. Those babies were more likely to survive than the
ones who were not touched. Remen surmises that isolation can weaken us and
touching can strengthen the will to live.
We experience touch through our
skin, the largest sensory organ of the human body. The human embryo
develops from three cell layers: the endoderm, the mesoderm, and the
ectoderm, the latter being the outer layer. This layer gives rise to the
nervous system and to the general surface covering the body—hair, nails,
teeth, skin—and to the sense organs of smell, taste, hearing, vision,
and touch. One of the primary functions of the central nervous system is
to keep the organism informed about what is going on outside the organism.
The nerve endings in the skin send signals or messages via the spinal cord
to the brain. The brain analyzes the information, interpreting the effect
of the touch. The brain then informs the rest of the body about the
response it will have to the touch. Interestingly, the skin also informs
the world outside the organism about what is going on within the organism.
As a physician, the color, temperature, texture, moistness and dryness,
thickness, and elasticity give me information about what is going on under
the skin and within the body.
The outer layer of skin, the
epidermis, contains the nerve endings that respond to touch. Dr. Ashley
Montagu, an anatomy expert, has written extensively about the tactile
system. He states that: "the
surface area of the skin has an enormous number of sensory receptors
receiving stimuli of heat, cold, touch, pressure, and pain. A piece of
skin the size of a quarter contains more than 3 million cells, 100 to 340
sweat glands, 50 nerve endings, and 3 feet of blood vessels.
It is estimated that there are some
50 receptors per 100 square millimeters, a total of 640,000 sensory
receptors. Tactile points vary from 7 to 135 per square centimeter. The
number of sensory fibers from the skin entering the spinal cord by the
posterior roots is well over half a million . . . in the adult male, in
whom [the skin] weighs about 8 pounds, containing some 5 million sensory
cells."
The functions of the skin include
temperature control, protection, metabolic functions, and sensation.
Touch is essential not only for the
newborns but also for children, adolescents, and adults. Dr. Montagu
speaks of contact between mother and child as being the first contact we
experience with the world. It provides comfort, security, warmth, and
food. He quotes Dr. James L. Halliday, a psychiatrist who wrote about
psychosocial issues in medicine, as saying that "infants deprived of
their accustomed maternal body contact may develop a profound depression
with lack of appetite, wasting, and even marasmus [wasting away] leading
to death." In the nineteenth century and through about 1920, the
death rate for babies abandoned to institutions was nearly 100 percent.
After 1915 doctors made rules requiring that babies be picked up and
carried around several times a day. Handling, carrying, caressing,
caregiving, and cuddling became known as basic experiences necessary to
the infant's ability to survive.
Self-esteem is based on bodily
relationship and connectedness, beginning in infancy and continuing
through childhood and adolescence. Montagu's book Touching
includes a second report by Dr. Jimmie Holland, who early in her career
worked with leukemia patients at the University of Buffalo School of
Medicine. In order to prevent all skin contact between patients and
others, the patients were isolated in germfree rooms as part of their
treatment. They could look
out of the rooms and be seen from without. They used verbal communication
facilities to interact with people outside their rooms.
Seventy-five percent of the patients "experienced an acute
sense of isolation, chiefly related to the inability to touch or be
touched directly. The loss of
human physical contact generated feelings of loneliness, frustration, a
sense of coldness, and a lack of emotional warmth." Physical contact—that
is, touch—is an essential ingredient to a sense of emotional
connectedness.
Terminally ill people also need to
be touched. For some people, connection begins with touch, physical touch.
Marjorie, who was in her early seventies, attended support groups at the
cancer center. She also attended weeklong retreats for persons with
life-threatening illnesses. She said that "touch is a necessity of
life. We need to be touched. When you attend one of the group meetings,
prepare your-self, because there's a lot of touching going on there, and I
think it's magical. I really do feel that if it isn't physically healing,
it is certainly emotionally and psychologically healing."
Her experience in the support group
was very different from when she was admitted to the hospital for a
medical procedure. "There was nobody to be with me, to hold my hand
and tell jokes or anything. It was the most horrifying experience, and I
was angry. I was really angry."
Throughout that initial hospital
experience she felt absolutely alone, not connected to the physician
performing the procedure, in pain and horrified.
She realized that for subsequent procedures in the hospital there
might be value in inviting a friend or a member of her support group to
join her. "I felt that I would be fine if there was someone from my
support group sitting beside me and holding my hand and talking—I didn't
care what they were saying, just a voice going through me while I was
doing it. The result was painless, two absolutely painless biopsies."
Marjorie felt that through the touch
of another person, a sense of togetherness was created and healing could
occur. During her medical procedures in the hospital, her friend's voice
also contributed to a pain-free experience even though she couldn't
remember what her friend had been speaking about; the content of what her
friend said was not important. She
also recommended that doctors touch patients in a reassuring way as part
of providing care for the patient.
Dr. Lewis Thomas, former president
of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, wrote in the
early 1980s that touching is a real professional secret, an essential
skill, and "the most effective act of doctors."
"Some people don't like being
handled by others, but not, or almost never, sick people. They need being
touched, and part of the dismay in being very sick is the lack of close
human contact. Ordinary people, even close friends, even family members,
tend to stay away from the very sick, touching them as infrequently as
possible for fear of interfering, or catching the illness, or just for
fear of bad luck. The doctor's oldest skill in trade was to place his
hands on the patient."
Touch is the strongest nonverbal
message that one person can give another.
But how does touch occur when it's not already a part of an
existing relationship, when it hasn't happened prior to knowing that
someone has a terminal illness? One way that it begins is by asking to be
touched or for permission to touch, as in: "'Can I hold your hand as
we speak?" "Do you mind if I put my arm around you?"
"May I hold you?"
In the past, when I read bedtime
stories to my daughters, the youngest would become impatient for a hug. I
had roughly three seconds to put my arm around her after we had snuggled
into our reading position. Any longer, and she would grab my hand and
swing my arm over her head and around her shoulders.
The oldest one would say, "I need a hug." Both of them
knew what they wanted (and needed). They knew they wanted to be touched as
well, when they woke from a scary dream, had to walk in the dark, or were
taking an unknown path. For them, touch, connection, and holding reduced their fears
and anxiety. Security came
from putting their hand into mine and knowing I was with them, physically
present. In many instances that security did not require words.
Assurance came from touch itself.
Family members left behind have
often said to me, "No one told me to touch my mother" (or
father, brother, sister, friend). "No one told me it was all right to
lie beside the person and hold them. It's what I really wanted to do, but
it felt awkward, so I didn't do it. But after the person died I was very
sorry and regret not having followed my own instinct." One told me:
"I stayed with Bill, my
husband, as he lay dying. I feel so bad now that I didn't lie beside him
on the bed and hold him in my arms! I'm reading about this now, the need
to touch. But worse than that was, I sent the children away. They came to
say goodbye to their father. They stood there and talked with him and said
what they had to say, which was very stoic. They didn't touch him, they
didn't sit on the bed. I would have liked some direction. I wish I'd been
told that it's okay to lie on the bed and put my arms around him and hold
him while he's dying instead of sitting on a chair. I wish someone had
told me that my children should stay with their father and sit beside him,
sit on the edge of the bed, touch him, hold his hand, talk to him, and
stay until he dies. But there was no one. I wish someone had been there to
tell me how to do it right—which I now know but didn't know then."
Would that have been what the loved
one wanted? In response, I ask another question: "Is that what I
would want, is that what you would want?" If so or if not, its
important to let others know about your wishes now. Touch is of value to
the person touching and to the person being touched.
Being touched or held can be
something you want and something you fear or feel awkward about. This
might arise from your personality or be due to the setting, such as a
hospital. If you long for touch (or more of it), I encourage you to speak
to someone you trust, someone likely to understand.
Ask someone you care about to hold your hand the next time you are
together. It might also mean
a hug when greeting or parting company. For some people this is natural,
for others uncomfortable. Discomfort can stem from lack of touching
experience in your past, but it is never too late to start anew.
Touch is essential to one's sense of well-being.
"Nurturing," "touch," and "connection"are
synonymous.
Start simply: Sit across the table
and hold hands as you speak. This may seem foreign, and perhaps only one
or two people will make you comfortable.
But if you try this, tell the other person how you feel: "I
feel close to you and would like to hold your hand or sit next to you, but
I want to respect you and not impose myself upon you. I would like to hold
your hand as we speak." Next, do the same thing, but without the
table; sit facing each other, knees touching, holding hands, and begin a
conversation. Eventually you may feel comfortable without even speaking.
Perhaps you can relate a story from your past describing how touch was
important to your sense of well-being. In that connection, both feel
reassured.
Marjorie spoke of her experience
with her mother:
"I hugged and touched my
mother, which made me feel good. And I think I told you, my mother was
never a physical woman, never a demonstrative woman with her children, but
by then I had learned. I was well into my experience with cancer and she
used to say, "I'm a brittle little lady of a hundred years." I
would hold her in my arms and give her a good hug. I thought, if I break
something, well, what the hell, that doesn't matter!
Touch is important. Even for the very few people who don't want to
be touched, I take a chance on touching rather than being afraid to touch.
Now I touch everybody."
I imagine Marjorie at the bedside of
her mother like one of the final scenes in Wit,
a play by Margaret Edson (and now a film) about the experience of dying.
Marjorie sits, holding her mother's hand, stroking the transparent,
wrinkled skin, realizing that her mother will never speak again. Slowly,
without losing contact, she removes her own shoes, lifts the comforter
that belonged to her mother for decades, and slips in beside her. She
exchanges the hand for an embrace. She simply holds her mother in her
arms, strokes her hair, and says through her touch and her words, "As
you held me at the beginning of my life, I now hold you as your life ends.
I want you to know and to feel the love I have for you."
From
What Dying People Want.
Copyright © 2002 by David Kuhl. Excerpted by arrangement with
PublicAffairs. $25. Available in local bookstores or click here.

|