C. Connection to the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks and District Instructional Programs

 

1.

While the Reading, MD tutoring curriculum is designed to be individualized to each student’s needs, it  consistently addresses eleven of the twenty-seven learning standards from the Massachusetts English Language Arts Curriculum Framework as published in June 2001.  The bulk of the standards addressed by Reading, MD’s methods fall within the Reading and Literature Strand of the Framework, but the program also provides instruction related to the Language and Composition Strands.

            Reading, MD concurs with the Framework’s statement that “the most effective way for students to learn words they need for adult life is through reading a variety of materials”; this is one of the reasons the Reading, MD lesson plan devotes so much time to active student reading (MDOE 11).  Furthermore, in providing individualized vocabulary instruction to students who require it to advance their reading level, Reading, MD is designed to emphasize all twenty-seven of the learning standards listed under the Framework’s fourth general standard, Vocabulary and Concept Development.  Reading, MD uses standards 4.1 – 4.19 to help students in need of remedial instruction acquire a vocabulary level more suitable to their grade (MDOE 19-20).  Standards 4.20 – 4.27 are then applied to lessons meant to help students gain momentum in their vocabulary development so that the appearance of new words in a text no longer hinders their understanding of the text’s general meaning. 

The general Reading, MD lesson plan also includes twenty fifteen minutes for students to work on their own writing.  This part of the lesson addresses three general standards of the Composition Strand: standards nineteen, twenty, and twenty-three.  The main purpose of this writing exercise coincides with standard twenty-three, which focuses on the organization of ideas in writing.  The writing part of the lesson plan is intended to help students understand the concept of paragraph structure by putting their own thoughts into this framework.  Writing topics vary depending on the books being read by students at a given time, so as they read different types of books students should receive instruction covering all of the standards listed under general standard twenty-three (MDOE 84-86).  The ultimate goal of Reading, MD’s writing instruction is for students to fulfill standard 19.30 and tutors will use as stepping stones to this goal standards 19.12, 19.13, 19.22, 19.23 and 19.26 (MDOE 72-74).  To get students to think about their audience and purpose in writing, they will be given a variety of essay prompts – including but not limited to those on the MCAS exam – and will therefore fulfill standard 20.6 (MDOE 78).

In basing individualized lesson plans on students’ different reading levels, Reading, MD focuses on specific standards of the Reading and Literature Strand for each student.  Lessons for students struggling with word recognition and comprehension will cover topics from standards seven (Beginning Reading) and eight (Understanding a Text).  Instruction in phonemic awareness and phonics will give students in need of remedial assistance the ability to recognize spelling and speech patterns listed as prerequisites for reading development in standard seven of the Framework.  Additionally, all students will spend significant portions of each lesson discussing a text with their tutors.  These discussions could cover any sub-standard of general standard eight since, once again, the lesson will vary by student.  For instance, tutors whose students struggle with retention of material will base their discussions on standards 8.2-8.10, while tutors with more advanced students will work on progressing through 8.11-8.22, and the final goal of all students will be to fulfill the standards through 8.34 (MDOE 35-37).  Tutors will guide their student’s progress by forming discussion questions to address the sub-standard that requires the most attention for the student to advance his or her reading level.

The aforementioned writing and discussion exercises will also address several other standards of the Massachusetts English Language Arts Curriculum Framework, including standards nine, eleven, twelve, thirteen, and eighteen.  As stated above, the individualized lesson plan is based on the books that the student is currently reading – for pleasure and for assigned reading – so a given lesson will address either standard twelve (Fiction), thirteen (Nonfiction), or both. These two standards will relate mainly to students who comprehend adequately and are ready to develop their analytical ability.  Students will first learn to express their reactions to and thoughts about a given passage orally in discussions with their tutors, then refine these thoughts and develop their use of textual evidence in their essays.

            A similar process will help students think about the concept of theme (standard eleven).  Tutors will explain the idea of theme to students during discussions of a text, first pointing out themes to students, and then decreasing the amount of assistance given to students until they can recognize and discuss themes on their own.  In writing exercises students will use evidence from a text to verify the presence of a given theme and eventually fulfill standard 11.7 by drawing examples from several texts that reflect a common theme (MDOE 45).

            Although Reading, MD does not explicitly provide instruction in history, the program does use standard nine to help students understand texts more thoroughly by thinking about the periods in which they take place and were written. Wherever possible tutors will utilize standards 9.3 - 9.7 in discussing a text to help students understand events or situations that might confuse the modern reader and to more fully appreciate the importance of the work in its historical context (MDOE 41).

            Finally, in focusing on students’ oral reading ability, Reading, MD aims to fulfill standard 18.2 (MDOE 65).  Students will advance from simply pronouncing written words to developing intonation and eventually to performing a text with appropriate inflection, emphasis, and feeling.

           

2.

            The various parts of the Reading, MD program will help students develop all of the learning strategies cited as essential for all Boston Public School students by the Citywide Learning Standards: Subject Area Summary for English/Language Arts 9-12.  Thus, Reading, MD students will improve their ability to do the following:

 

1.       Read, write, and think a lot about topics and ideas of importance to them.

2.       Set goals or purposes for their learning.

3.       Make personal connections between the content and other knowledge, experiences, text, or media.

4.       Ask questions as they read, listen, or view.

5.       Clarify the meaning of words or content they don’t understand.

6.       Listen or watch for important elements, themes, or issues.

7.       Create sensory images.

8.       Make predictions, inferences and judgments.

9.       Get “in the shoes” of characters or participants.

10.   Create ongoing summaries or syntheses.

11.   Build on their understandings by sharing and discussing them with others.

12.   Assess their learning and make mid-course corrections (BPS 2-3)

 

Furthermore, Reading, MD will help its students reach many of the goals required of all Boston Public School students before graduation in the areas of Oral Presentation and Discussion, Language, Reading and Literature, and Composition.  These goals are listed in the Citywide Learning Standards: Subject Area Summary for English/Language Arts 9-12 under the heading “English Language Arts: Grade 12” and, although not specifically enumerated there, are here numbered based on the order in which they appear.

The discussion and writing parts of the Reading, MD lesson plan will help students develop the following goals for Oral Presentation and Discussion: numbers three through eight and number ten (BPS 19).  In general, students will learn to articulate their ideas, support these ideas by drawing evidence from the text, and respond to the comments of others.

Of the five goals under the heading Language, Reading, MD focuses on the first two by instructing students in the use of reference materials and providing background information regarding different historical uses of grammar and diction as they appear in a text (BPS 19).

Reading, MD instruction will help students achieve all twenty-five goals listed under the category of Reading and Literature (BPS 19-20).  More specifically, students will address the following goals in developing their comprehension ability through discussion and individualized comprehension instruction: one, five, eight, nine, ten, and thirteen.  In writing and discussion exercises students will work toward the following analytical goals: four, six, eleven, twelve, and fifteen through twenty-five.  And through assessing their progress with their tutor they will improve the following skills: two, three, seven, and fourteen.

Regarding Composition, Reading, MD students will develop the following pre-writing abilities by learning to articulate, organize, and develop ideas during discussions and writing exercises: one, two, three, six, and seven (BPS 20-21).  Goals four, five, nine, twelve, thirteen, fifteen, sixteen, seventeen, twenty, and twenty-one deal with the actual writing and analysis process and will be addressed during writing exercises.  And lastly, goals ten, eight, and four deal with revising and analyzing one’s own writing and will be addressed in discussions between student and tutor regarding completed writing exercises.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Question C

1.                  Boston Public Schools. Citywide Learning Standards Subject Area Summary: English/Language Arts 9-12. September, 2003.

< http://boston.k12.ma.us/teach/curriculum.asp>. Date viewed: March 28, 2005.

2.                  Massachusetts Department of Education. Massachusetts English Language Arts Curriculum Framework, June, 2001.

< http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/ela/0601.pdf>. Date viewed: March 28, 2005.