|
Conceptual
Framework |
![](images/educator.gif) |
Shared
Vision and Theme of the Education Unit |
A
conceptual framework captures the shared vision of the Unit,
guides the activities of faculty and candidates, and becomes
the vehicle through which the Unit's goals are articulated to
the broader community. A conceptual framework promotes cohesion
within the Unit and becomes a base from which "continuous
improvement, renewal and change can occur" (Dottin, 2001,
p. 3). |
The vision of the Western Connecticut State University (WCSU)
Education Unit is reflected in the term EDUCATOR (Expertise
in content knowledge, Diversity, Unity, Classroom
and school leadership, Attitudes, Technology,
Organize knowledge and facilitate learning, Reflective
practitioner) and the theme Preparing teachers and counselors
to facilitate student growth and achievement in the 21st Century.
The components of our Conceptual Framework underscore our belief
that teachers and counselors in the new millennium must understand
how to use information technologies and how to work effectively
with the diversity of students found in public schools in order
to prepare all students for success in a technological, multicultural,
global society. Teachers and counselors must know how to work
collaboratively with colleagues and communicate with a variety
of constituencies in order to be classroom and school leaders
capable of effecting change and ensuring quality educational
programs for all students. They must be reflective practitioners
who continually evaluate and modify their practice, not only
to meet the learning and developmental needs of students, but
also to keep pace with a rapidly changing society and world.
The term EDUCATOR embodies the components of our Conceptual
Framework and serves to remind us that we, the faculty, are
first and foremost responsible for preparing the educators of
the future. |
The
Development of the Conceptual Framework |
The
development of the Conceptual Framework over the past years
has been an exciting professional endeavor for Education and
Educational Psychology faculty. We began to look at the WCSU
teacher and counselor preparation programs from new perspectives,
using guidelines we received from attendance at Connecticut
State Department of Education (CSDE) training sessions, and
focusing on national standards and performance based assessments.
We relied on both "bottom up" and "top down"
processes to develop a Conceptual Framework that would articulate
a shared vision for education programs at WCSU. We looked at
our program to identify the common threads running through coursework,
field experiences and practica and saw how current practice
was aligned with national, state and institutional standards
(e.g., NCATE, the Connecticut Common Core of Teaching and E&EP
Department objectives). We found new areas to address as a result
of this investigative process. We realized that we needed (a)
to identify the specific dispositions that we feel are important
in teaching and counseling and to begin building into the program
methods of assessing the development of these dispositions and
(b) to identify and begin to design additional performance based
assessments to use at transition points throughout the program.
As a result of these efforts, our Conceptual Framework currently
reflects the best of what our program has been in the past while
describing our vision and hope for the future. We realize, however,
that work on the conceptual framework is an ongoing process. |
The
University's Mission Statement, Principles and Values |
Western
Connecticut State University serves as an accessible, responsive
and creative intellectual resource for the people and institutions
of Connecticut. We strive to meet the educational needs of
a diversified student body through instruction, scholarship
and public service. Western aspires to be a public university
of choice for programs of excellence in the liberal arts and
the professions by providing full-time and part-time students
with the necessary background to be successful in their chosen
careers and to be productive members of society. It accomplishes
this by emphasizing:
- A strong
liberal arts foundation
- Strong
skills in communication, problem solving, and critical thinking
- Opportunities
for experiential, cooperative, and internships experiences
- A strong
background in information technologies
- Interdisciplinary
programs
- A strong
sense of commitment to public service
- A personalized
learning environment
Our mission
as a public comprehensive University is given life through
the principles and values that guide us.
|
FULFILLING
THE MISSION |
Principles
· Empowering students to attain the highest standards
of academic achievement, public and professional services,
personal development, and ethical conduct is our fundamental
responsibility.
· Facilitating learning is our primary function, and
it requires that our faculty be active scholars who have a
lasting interest in enhancing instruction and that our curriculum
be dynamic and include advanced instructional technologies.
· Preparing students for enlightened and productive
participation in a global society is our obligation and is
best fulfilled by developing the best possible academic programs
and learning experiences.
· Promoting a rich and diverse cultural environment
that allows freedom of expression within a spirit of civility
and mutual respect is our abiding commitment
· Strengthening our partnership with the people and
institutions of Connecticut is a benefit to both the University
and the state and endows our teaching and scholarship with
a special vitality and dedication.
Values
- Quality
and integrity in all that we do, and a commitment to continuous
improvement.
- Respect
for the dignity and rights of each member of our University
community.
Senate Revised R-03-11-02
President Approval 12/17/03
|
The
School of Professional Studies Mission Statement |
The School
of Professional Studies will be recognized for its unique
and dynamic educational, applied research, and community service
components, and will be the principle center for public sector
higher education in the professional studies of teacher education,
music performance, health and human services for the Western
region of Connecticut. To achieve this mission, the School
of Professional Studies and its academic departments with
their degree and related programs will:
- Provide
excellence and access to undergraduate and graduate education
in teacher education, music, and health and human services
that is built on a strong foundation in the liberal arts
and sciences, and that values open communication, creative
and critical inquiry, the expansion of performance-based
experiential learning practice, and the role of technology
in professional practice and teaching;
- Serve
students who reflect the full diversity of the Western region
of Connecticut, and who will upon graduation serve professionally
as culturally competent advocates, active in the provision
of high level professional services to the broad spectrum
of the population in the Western region of Connecticut;
- Contribute
to the quality and scope of liberal arts and sciences education
at WCSU by offering courses appropriate for all students
as well as through interdisciplinary, collaborative educational
efforts with other units within the University;
- Contribute
to the body of knowledge of the teaching, music, health
and human service professions through the research and scholarly
activities by the faculty, and will introduce students to
research methods and practice;
- Contribute
to the enrichment and leadership of professional communities,
and will serve the professional and lay communities in a
variety of ways including partnerships in the development
of effective teaching, health and human service policies,
research, community assessment and development;
- Respond
to the institutional and regional community with regard
to cultural life, education health and human welfare needs;
- And
commit to the challenge of life long learning in response
to changes in the teaching, music, health care and human
service professions by offering continuing education for
alumni, practicing professionals, and the lay community.
|
The
Education and Educational Psychology Department's Mission Statement
and Objectives (Revised Fall 2003) |
The mission
of the Education and Educational Psychology (E&EP) Department
is to prepare candidates for careers in teaching and counseling
professions. We believe in initiating and maintaining professional
relationships with the broader educational community and are
committed to the continuous support and development of cooperative
projects and services with area schools and community agencies.
We embrace the broader mission of Western Connecticut State
University to empower students to "
attain the highest
standards of academic achievement
personal development,
and ethical conduct". Candidates in our teacher and counselor
preparation programs must achieve the following objectives:
- demonstrate
academic competence in their selected fields,
- complete
a general program of studies (in Education) in addition
to a recommended content area major other than Education,
- know
the historical, social, economic, political, comparative
and philosophical foundations of education or school counseling,
- understand
the variety of patterns of human growth and development
- value
and infuse cultural diversity,
- demonstrate
a proficiency in and working knowledge of the Connecticut
Common Core of Teaching (with the embedded Connecticut Competency
Instrument), Connecticut Common Core of Learning, Curriculum
Frameworks K-12, the Connecticut Code of Professional Responsibility,
and effective practices in the profession,
- demonstrate
a spirit of inquiry, the use of critical thinking skills,
and the habits of the reflective practitioner, and,
- demonstrate
the ability to incorporate appropriately the use of technology
in instructional practices.
|
Components
(Themes) of the Conceptual Framework: |
Expertise
in content knowledge
Teachers must possess knowledge in order to transmit knowledge
and facilitate learning. Knowledge of the facts, principles
and concepts that comprise the subject matter that one is
preparing to teach is a necessary, though not sufficient,
condition for excellence in schooling (Murray & Porter,
1996; Shulman, 1987). Candidates preparing to teach in elementary
schools must be competent generalists who themselves have
a high degree of competence in reading, writing, and mathematics,
as well as a sound knowledge base in the natural, physical
and social sciences. Candidates preparing to teach subjects
at the middle and high school levels must be content area
specialists; they must demonstrate both depth and breadth
of understanding in the subject matter they are preparing
to teach, and they must have an understanding of the modes
of inquiry and epistemological frameworks of their discipline(s).
School
of Arts &Sciences
Diversity
Teachers and counselors in the 21st Century cannot effectively
prepare P-12 students for participation in a global, multicultural
society without themselves embracing attitudes and employing
educational practices that value, respect and nurture the
diversity found in the United States. Candidates in teacher
and counselor preparation programs learn about the variety
of diverse groups that comprise our nation and how to develop
curriculum and teaching or counseling strategies that are
maximally effective in helping these children grow and learn.
Teachers must understand how disability influences development
and appreciate the impact of factors such as race, ethnicity,
culture, language and socioeconomic status on learning and
school achievement in order to develop curriculum and choose
teaching strategies that facilitate learning for all students
(Haberman, 1991; Sigel, 1990). The Diversity component of
the Unit's Conceptual Framework reflects the Council for Exceptional
Children's (CEC) Content Standards, particularly Standards
3, 5, and 6. Standard 3 states that "special educators
understand that the beliefs, traditions, and values across
and within cultures can affect relationships among and between
students, their families, and the school community. Content
Standard 5 states that "
special educators foster
environments in which diversity is valued and individuals
are taught to live harmoniously and productively in a culturally
diverse world." Standard 6 states that "special
educators match their communication methods to an individual's
language proficiency and cultural and linguistic differences"
(http://www.cec.sped.org).
Danielson
(1996) emphasizes the importance of teachers' sensitivity
to students' cultural backgrounds, including relevant information
of cultural traditions, religious practices, patterns of interaction,
and instructional practices that impact students' learning.
Darling-Hammond (2000) points out that the "effects of
well prepared teachers on student achievement can be stronger
than the influences of student background factors such as
poverty, language background, and minority status (p. 37)".
We feel that this preparation must include the knowledge,
skills and dispositions required of culturally competent teachers
and counselors and the development of awareness of one's own
beliefs about and attitudes towards different groups and an
understanding of how these beliefs and attitudes impact teaching
and counseling (Sue & Sue, 2001). We embrace the recommendations
of Sobel, Taylor, and Anderson (2003) who suggest that schools
and universities develop partnerships in resolving the issue
of teachers' abilities to practice culturally relevant and
differentiated instruction.
Unity
Schools of excellence have a sense of community and value
team-building. A climate of collaboration and mutual support
is paramount to the development of responsive, flexible P-12
educational settings that are equipped to meet the needs of
all learners. Collaborative learning environments facilitate
the development of teachers' own learning (Howey, 1996). The
Teacher Education Programs at Western Connecticut State University
encourages unity among teacher preparation candidates through
the use of educational cohorts. During their senior year,
candidates for certification in education are accepted in
the Professional Semester in cohorts ranging in size from
15 to 25 students. These cohorts take classes together, share
the same professors and are involved in similar pre-professional
experiences. The common elements in their programs give candidates
an opportunity to experience first-hand the benefits of being
part of a collaborative community and receiving support from
peers and colleagues. When evaluating the Professional Semester
experience, candidates comment favorably on their cohort experience
and point to the positive impact it has had on their development
in the affective as well as the cognitive domain. This cohort
experience is consistent with new teacher standards that include
an emphasis on collegiality (Yinger, 1999).
Classroom and school leadership
Teachers have historically been expected to be leaders in
their own classrooms. More recently, the school based management
and instructional leadership initiatives of the past two decades
have provided a vision of how the teacher's role might be
broadened to include participation in building level and district
level governance. We believe that preparation for classroom
leadership is the one of the most important responsibilities
of teacher preparation programs at the initial levels. However,
we recognize that classroom teachers, through collaboration
with colleagues in the school and the community, have the
power to shape curriculum and influence educational policy,
and we believe that it is the University's responsibility
to nurture these capabilities in teacher candidates. For us,
leadership comes from the ability to envision change and to
communicate and work with others to solve problems and transform
ideas into educational practice which they work in a variety
of ways. The Unit's underlying theory of leadership is taken
from the works of Burns (1978) and focuses on the constructs
of transactional leadership, transformational leadership and
moral leadership. Implementation of leadership theory is articulated
as "instructional leadership" and presupposes that
the teacher is an agent of change within schools. Candidates
seeking initial certification will gain the knowledge, skills
and dispositions needed to become effective classroom leaders.
Advanced candidates in graduate programs will be expected
to demonstrate transactional leadership skills and to identify
exemplars of transformational/moral leadership behaviors.
Advanced candidates should also be able to demonstrate the
capacity to understand group processes and the interrelationship
of leadership and school culture (Peterson & Deal, 1998)
Attitudes
The
Education and Educational Psychology Department at WestConn
is committed to providing its Teacher Education and Counselor
Education candidates with the knowledge, skills, and dispositions
that will equip them for their chosen professional careers.
The acquisition of knowledge and skills does not guarantee
that they will be used and applied. As Cantor (1990) puts
it, "having" is not necessarily "doing."
He believes that dispositions and their associated skills
can be strengthened within effective teaching practices. Candidates'
dispositions, therefore, are important for the implementation
of their acquired knowledge and skills.
Dispositions,
according to NCATE (2003), are the (1) values expressed by
a person as his or her beliefs, attitudes, and feelings; (2)
commitments which lead the person to action in the future
and which are motivating forces for those actions; and, (3)
professional ethics that exist outside the individual, representing
an ethical code by which the person tries to live and perform
moral duties and obligations. In essence, dispositions are
guided by beliefs and attitudes related to values such as
caring, fairness, honesty, responsibility and social justice.
Teachers' and counselors' dispositions influence their behaviors
toward students, families, communities, and colleagues (National
Board for Professional Teaching Standards). Those dispositions
affect student learning, motivations, and development, as
well as the professional growth of teachers and counselors.
The E & EP Department consulted pertinent state and accrediting
organizations' documents (CCCT, INTASC, NCATE, CSDE Code of
Professional Responsibility, and NEA Code of Ethics) and determined
that the following values, commitments and ethical principles
have been established as dispositions that influence teachers'
behaviors toward students, and that affect learning, motivation,
and development: (1) values that express the belief that all
students can learn (CCCT), that diversity and the individual's
differences and cultures are valuable (NCATE), that being
passionate about teaching and learning, while maintaining
a student-centered centered approach, and making instructional
decisions based on students' well-being are worthwhile (CCCT);
(2) commitments: to create and maintain a safe, nurturing
environment conducive to learning and positive social interaction
(CCCT and INTASC Principle 5), to be a reflective teacher,
dedicated to the role of assessment in its improvement of
student achievement (CCCT and INTASC Principle 9)), to addressing
a variety of students' learning styles (INTASC Principle 3),
to using technology effectively in the classroom (NCATE),
to maintaining national, state, and local educational standards
in the classroom appropriate to grade levels and disciplines;
(3) professional ethics which recognize, respect, and uphold
the dignity and worth of students as individual human beings,
and therefore deal justly, fairly, and considerately with
students (CSDE Code of Professional Responsibility, NEA Code
of Ethics).
The following dispositions influence teacher behaviors toward
communities and families: (1) values: such as a willingness
to establish rapport by maintaining and actively fostering
trust and respect in relationships (INTASC Principle 10),
to communicate effectively with all stakeholders in the teaching
and learning process; (2) commitments: to assist students'
caregivers in developing the skills they need to raise and
protect their children (National PTA Mission Statement), and
become familiar with the school and community of the student
teaching placement; (3) professional ethics which maintain
the confidentiality of all information pertaining to students
and their families (CSDE Code of Professional Responsibility).
The following dispositions influence candidates' behaviors
toward University and school personnel involved with the formative
and collegial aspects of the candidates' education: (1) value
collaboration with other teachers and fosters school relationships
that support students' learning and well-being (INTASC Principle
10) in a team environment, which might involve an inclusive
setting, reception of and acting upon constructive feedback
in an accepting manner; (2) commitments: to the attributes
of being a leader and a change agent; collegiality, cooperation
and collaboration, and maintaining the professional responsibilities
and obligations of the teaching staff of the school in which
the candidate is doing his or her field experiences; (3) professional
ethics: to assume responsibility and seek out opportunities
for his or her professional development by continually evaluating
the effects of his or her choices and actions on others (CSDE
Code of Professional Responsibility and INTASC Principle 9),
and maintain the confidentiality of all information concerning
colleagues obtained in the proper course of the educational
process (CSDE Code of Professional Responsibility). "
..one
of the most important dispositions to be listed in educational
goals is the disposition to go on learning" (Katz, 1993).
The Unit has selected six (6) dispositions from among those
described above that it expects successful candidates for
certification to demonstrate. Successful candidates will demonstrate
the following values, commitments and professional ethics.
Successful candidates will
1) Believe that all children can learn (Commitment)
2) Respect diversity (Value)
3) Feel passionate about teaching and committed to learning
(Value and Commitment)
4) Value ethical and professional behavior (Professional
Ethics)
5) Believe that teachers and counselors share responsibility
for children's cognitive, social and emotional development
(Professional Ethic)
6) Value families and believe in communication with them
(Values and Commitment)
Technology
The early 21st Century has witnessed the transformation of
the United States from an industrial society to an information
society. As a result, technology is playing an increasingly
important role in educational practice and is becoming an
accepted way of "communicating, informing and knowing"(Norton
& Wiburg, 2003, p. 4). In order to prepare students in
schools to succeed in school and beyond, candidates in teacher
preparation programs must be able to apply information technology
to instruction. According to Jefferson and Edwards (2000),
"teachers are the key to effective and efficient technology
utilization" (p.140). The use of technology is consistent
with constructivist thinking in that it is one way that teachers
can become facilitators of learning instead of transmitters
of knowledge (Shelly, Cashman, Gunter, Gunter, 2002). Technology
allows the teacher to create "active, multidimensional
lessons that scaffold students' learning" (Oakes &
Lipton, 1999, p. 218).
|
Organize
knowledge and facilitate learning (Pedagogy) |
Introduction
Pedagogy concerns itself with the theory and practice of teaching
and learning. Teachers organize content knowledge when they
develop curriculum and plan lessons, and, through the use
of carefully-chosen and varied instructional strategies, they
are able to facilitate learning for all students. Our understanding
of how students learn and what constitutes effective instruction
has grown exponentially during the past twenty-five years.
The work of developmental psychologists has given us an appreciation
of the capabilities of young learners (Brunner, 1968; Flavell,
1985) and the importance of social interactions and strategies
such as scaffolding and modeling in instruction (Vygotsky,
1978). Learning is conceptualized as a constructivist, interactive
process in which the learner interacts with aspects of the
learning environment (e.g., print and nonprint materials and
the teacher) in order to build increasingly complex knowledge
networks (Gagne, 1985). Consistent with the Common Core of
Teaching, we believe that sound pedagogy takes into account
the cognitive, affective and psychomotor development of the
learner. Candidates in teacher and counselor preparation programs
at Western Connecticut State University acquire knowledge
of pedagogy through coursework, field experiences and pratica.
Pedagogical content knowledge
Pedagogical content knowledge refers to, "The interaction
of the subject matter and effective teaching strategies to
help students learn the subject matter. It requires a thorough
understanding of the content to teach it in multiple ways,
drawing on the cultural backgrounds and prior knowledge and
experiences of students" (NCATE Standards, 2003, p. 55).
Professional and Pedagogical Knowledge
and Skills
The second area, professional and pedagogical knowledge and
skills, is comprised of two parts. The first part, pedagogical
knowledge, refers to, "The general concepts theories
and research about effective teaching, regardless of content
areas." (NCATE Standards, 2003, p. 55). The second part,
"professional knowledge" refers to, "The historical,
economic, sociological, philosophical, and psychological understandings
of schooling and education. It also includes knowledge about
learning, diversity, technology, professional ethics, legal
and policy issues, pedagogy and the roles and responsibilities
of the profession of teaching." The word "skills"
in this area implies an emphasis on the development of professional
level competence, which is the outcome of a successful student
teaching, practicum or internship experience.
Reflective Practitioner
Dewey's view of inquiry (1998) and Schön's (1983) perspective
of the reflective practitioner provide the theoretical foundation
for the Unit's thinking about reflective practice. Since there
is a strong belief that teachers should persist in on-going
systematic inquiry in order to produce sound conclusions about
their practices (Dewey, 1933), a query or problem is at the
heart of reflection. Expanding upon this concept, Schön
(1983) distinguishes between reflection-in and reflection-on
a teaching situation. The reflective practitioner not only
thinks about and responds to what is taking place (reflection-in),
but also takes the time to draw upon past experiences to plan
for future ones (reflection-on). Through reflective practice,
teachers continually improve their professional abilities.
Inquiry and reflection are included in courses throughout
the program.
|
References |
|
Bruner,
J. S. (1968). Toward a theory of instruction. New York:
Norton. |
|
|
Burns,
J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row. |
|
|
Cantor,
N. (1990). From thought to behavior: "Having"
and "doing" in the study of personality
and |
|
cognition.
American Psychologist 45(6), 735-750.Connecticut State
Department of Education
(1999). Connecticut's Common Core of Teaching. Hartford,
CT: Bureau of Evaluation and Educator Standards. Connecticut
State Department of Education (2002). CCT Performance
Table: A Career Continuum.
Hartford, CT: Bureau of Evaluation and Educator Standards. |
|
|
Connecticut
State Department of Education. (n.d.). Connecticut code
of professional responsibility for |
|
teachers.
Hartford, CT: Author. |
|
|
Danielson,
D. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework
for teaching. |
|
|
Darling-Hammond,
L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher
Education, 51(3),
|
|
166-173.
Alexandria,
VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. |
|
|
Dewey,
J. (1933). How we think. New York: Houghton Mifflin. |
|
|
Dottin,
E. S. (2001). Developing a conceptual framework: The stimulation
for Coherence and continuous |
|
improvement
in teacher education. Lanham, MD: University Press of
America. |
|
|
Flavell,
J. H. (1985). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice-Hall. |
|
|
Gagné,
E. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning.
Boston: Little Brown and
Company. |
|
|
Haberman,
M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus the pedagogy
of good teaching. Phi Delta Kappa, |
|
73(4),
290-294. |
|
|
Howey,
K. (1996). Designing coherent and effective teacher education
programs. In J. Sikula (Ed.), |
|
Handbook
of research on teacher education: A project of the Association
of Teacher Educators
(2nd ed., pp. 143-170). New York: Macmillan. Interstate
New Teacher Assessment and Support
Consortium (INTASC). (1992). Model standards for beginning
teacher licensing, assessment and
development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington,
DC: Council of Chief State School
Officers. Retrieved March 16, 2004, from http://www.ccsso.org/content/pdfs/corestrd.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
Interstate
New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC).
(1992). Model standards for |
|
beginning
teacher licensing, assessment and development: A resource
for state dialogue.
Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers,
Retrieved March 16, 2004 from
http://www.ccsso.org/content/pdfs/corestrd.pdf |
|
|
|
|
Katz,
L. G. (1993). Dispositions as Educational Goals. Urbana,
IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary |
|
and
Early Childhood Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED363454) |
|
|
Murray,
F.B., & Porter, A. (1996). Pathway from the liberal
arts curriculum to lessons in the schools. In F. |
|
B.
Murray (Ed.), Teacher Educator's Handbook: Building a
knowledge base for the preparation of
teachers (pp. 155-178). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
|
|
|
National
Board for Professional Teaching Standards (n.d.). Standards.
Retrieved March 16, 2004, from |
|
http://www.nbpts.org/standards/stdsoverviews.cfm |
|
|
National
Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE).
(2002). Professional standards for the |
|
accreditation
of schools, colleges, and departments of education.
Washington, DC: Author. |
|
|
National
Education Association (n.d.). Code of ethics of the education
profession. Retrieved March 16, |
|
2004,
from http://www.nea.org/code.html |
|
|
Norton,
P., & Wiburg, K. (2003). Teaching with technology.
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
|
|
|
Oakes,
J., & Lipton, M. (1999). Teaching to change the world.
New York: McGraw-Hill. |
|
|
Peterson,
K. D., & Deal, T. E., (1998). How leaders influence
the culture of schools. Educational
|
|
Leadership,
56(1) 28-30. |
|
|
Schön,
D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic
Books. |
|
|
Shelly
G., Cashman, T. J., Gunter, R.E., & Gunter, G.A. (2002).
Integrating technology in the classroom |
|
(3rd
ed.). Boston, MA: Thompson
Learning, Inc. |
|
|
Shulman,
L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the
new reform. Harvard
Education |
|
Review,
57(1), February, 1-22. |
|
|
Sigel,
I. E. (1990). What teachers need to know about human development.
In. D. Dill, (Ed.) Research that |
|
informs
teachers and teacher education (pp. 76-93). Bloomington,
In: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. |
|
|
|
Sobel,
D.M., Taylor, S.V., & Anderson, R.E. (2003). Shared
accountability: Encouraging |
|
diversity-responsive
teaching in inclusive contexts. Council for Exceptional
Children,
35(6), 46-54. |
|
|
|