LETTER TO PROMINENT THEORETICAL PHYSICIST

From: "zeropoint" zap.dnai@rcn.com
Subject: [invalid] opinion 000
To: "Professor Michio Kaku" MKAKU@AOL.COM
.......................
Dear Dr. Kaku:
	I am jerked back to this conversation below by the detail
of part of a documentary in which a theoretical physicist discusses
the confounding "insolubility" of  Super String Theory.  That physicist,
whose name I don't recall... the show apparently presented women,
Latinos and the Negroid who had transcended stereotypes to become
accomplished in math and physics... that theoretical physicist
discussed his work by actually holding his math up in front of the
camera and talking about a few of the intricacies of Super String
Theory.  The physicist said exactly what you say about the opaqueness
of Super String Theory.
	However, when that scientist held up his work and discussed
the parts of the theory in particular detail, I could understand
exactly what he was saying, though I am far from being a mathematician.
The "mirror" was discussed in the same paragraph with "chiral super-
symmetry."  
	Professor Kaku, I don't know if you are reading anything I
have to say beyond what will "give you the gist" of what it presents,
but it seems to me - that when I discuss the higher functions of the
cosmos in generating the substrate for matter, in the inner reaches
of the quantum substructure of matter between the boson and the 
completion of the next of three regions described as the tenth,
ninth, and eighth dimensions in a group rendering the anatomy of a
naked singularity in their primordial presence as the birthing 
sequences of the cosmos - that you would recognize the terminology
as that of the rendering in prose of that which has been ascertained
by mathematics, by the Super String Theory.
	Each rendering of the paradigm I produce is somewhat different.
I have not sent you very much nor very many attempts to utter the
paradigm.  But recently I used the "mirror-like wisdom" and the 
generation of "handedness" in the establishment of "all prepositionality"
in a synoptic statement of the paradigm, perhaps in summary2.txt
(now in slightly modified form at http://www.dnai.com/~zap/SAUCER/paradigm.htm
as a link and downloadable as: http://www.dnai.com/~zap/SAUCER/summary2.htm,)
which is now at the site if not cached on your disk as a recent post
from this possibly perceived to be pest.
	It is occurring to me that the Super String Theory IS ITSELF
THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE COSMOS, but that the ability to thread the
theory through the consciousness in a stream of realization is what is
missing that would be the edification of theoretical physicists.  I
cannot speak to the integrity of the SST - GUFT in encapsulating the
range, domain, and dynamics of reality, but I can say that to be 
comfortable with the theory, one has to be able to "coincide oneself"
with the theory.  The block to understanding the theory is the "locking
up" of the ego at the points where the nature of ego itself is defined
by the theory.  It is a kind of double-bind.  
	I tend to present the theory in most renditions as the meta-
neurological structuring of mind.  I have lifted this theory part and
parcel out of Tibetan cosmology, though it does not itself declare the
theory as an eleven dimensional structure.  The examination of myself
as an accomplished "bodhisattva" by a Tibetan Lama involved my own
grasp of the detail of the two basic groups making up reality: the 
"naked singularity" and the matter that "clothes" it.  To achieve such
an understanding, which may be described as enlightenment, one has to
be able to turn over that to which he has been exposed by speech and
writings in his mind, and in the quiet privacy therein.  The material
is inevitably presented in the form of chakras.  These are the psycho-
dynamical segments of psyche in two categories (noumenal/phenomenal)
separated by a relative torus.  The chakras are at the extreme end of 
but still in the middle of the cosmos as organized by scale.  The 
chakras are at the extreme end of scale because they are the ultimate 
expression of the ordering of mind; and they are in the middle because 
the physical and functional are divisible toward the atomic and the 
fundamental elements of organic/mental structure.  This personal
realm of "chakradom" is as the dimensionless thickness of a two 
dimensional surface or mirror.
	What I see to be the stumbling block is not intellect nor
"smartness" itself, but the [in]ability to confront certain of the
functions of reality that are stabilized by the body, the ego.  It is
the indifference of reality to time and to place that are at the heart
of the seizure of "freedom of mind."
	This predicament is focused in the Heisenberg Uncertainty
Principle, also in the subject of Bell's Theorem.  The basic blind
spot is indicated by the insistence on the part of Greats like Feynman
and possibly others like Einstein - I can think of no particular 
statement by Einstein himself that indicates the error - who consider 
vacuum out of which is effected vacuum genesis who do not premise the
birth of the cosmos out of empty space.  Space itself is created in
vacuum genesis.  
	It is the "organization" of space itself which is at the heart
of those early processes which are referred to in the earliest stages 
of the phenomenon called "The Big Bang."  The mirroring and the super
symmetry are structural details of the process itself.  The process of
the creation of space is indifferent to the assignment of location to
its eventuality.  This is where "the block" asserts itself.  
	The quote, in the brief exchange recorded below, presents the
cute comment about theory and practise.  What I suggest, as ever I
have, is that the Super String Theory be "thickened" to allow for its
terminology to be inclusive of the psyche and of the emotional, that it 
be endowed with the vocabulary to describe consciousness.
	We may know that students of abnormal psychology tend to see
themselves in each dynamic presented and somewhat in the client studied
in any given case history.  It is the result of a passive and almost
reflexive process of identification.  
	I propose therefore that theoretical physicists begin to endow
themselves somewhat as had Oppenheimer, and as Von Neumann (orion.htm, 
phlaexp.doc) has seen fitting to do, with fluency in the metaphysical, 
with the lore of the East.  This pertains to the "higher" forms of 
Buddhism.  Doing so will enable the intellect, give it "freedom" of 
self expression, let it the domain of activity otherwise bound and 
denied perspicacity, smartness.  Let me point out that the top-most
chakra, "the lotus of one thousand petals", is associated with paired
emotions, as are most of the chakras, termed "wheels" in the other
spaces: intelligence/stupidity.  That chakra is the one adjacent to 
that of the "mirror-like wisdom!"
	It is my clinical observation that theorists lapse into a 
sense of awe when confronted with the outrageous potency of reality,
of God Almighty, and "freeze up."  Being able to "coincide" with 
reality, by being one's healthy self, enables one's personal narrative
to defy the deadly bifurcation which is narcissism.  That narcissism 
is not a derogatory suggestion, it is the suggestion that the pairing
afforded those with a fundamentally atheistic posture who enjoy
the experience of narcissism is that of God looking down at a "mere"
human being, which is why the theorist senses himself to be and to perform
as inadequate, impotent to climb his own Ziguraut or Babylonian Tower
into the freedom of the Mind of God.  It is better to coincide with cosmic 
consciousness than to objectify it and to ignore it.  That Ziguraut
is the Super String Theory itself.

	Most cordially, zeropoint

........................ zeropoint

From: "zeropoint" 
Subject: invalid opinion

	"Man is not smart enough to understand a "Theory of
Everything."  -Michio Kaku

	You must realize that you speak for yourself in that,
Dr. Kaku.

The show airs tonight.   I only saw you in a cut-out.  Will
comment later. 
................ zeropoint


From: "Michio Kaku" Mkaku@aol.com
Subject: re: invalid opinion

Hey, I never said that we can never understand a theory of everything.
I only said that, at present, no one is smart enough to solve string theory.
The theory is perfectly well-defined, except no one is smart enough to
solve it.
Michio Kaku

	It is your way and that of your colleagues and co-
professionals to fixate on "theory".  I do hope you have read
and considered the quote sent to you: "In theory, theory and
practise are the same; in practise, they are not."

	How the cosmos [not the universe] actually operates is
ineffable in theory.  That is the structural flaw in orientation
to theory.  You seem to be totally unaware of some of the work
in which are involved other scientists working with the U.S.
government and other scientists with other governments.  That
would be unfortunate, except that if you were or are involved
in such researches and development projects, you would be
sworn to that malignant silence, a silence which will be put
into practice in a scenario which will entail your demise if 
you are in New York City on August 24, 1998.  The violence to
be effected then is to be brought about by the old work of Dr.
Nicolai Tesla, a scalar technology induced earthquake.  The
purpose is one involving the geopolitical restructuring of
human society.  If you fall victim to the plot, I shall not be
able to tell you "I told you so."  If you do not, it will be
too late to do much in the wake of the ensuing chaos and 
intensive manipulations to follow in the wake of that devastation.

	The manner of the operation or process of the cosmos,
the cosmos IS process, is explicable to yourself in a few 
minutes.

	The fundamental process which is the cosmos is extra-
ordinarily simple.  Working analytically with extant devices,
one can reach the understanding that eludes yourself and other
theorists.  I do hope your cultural intransigence will find
resolution before it is a moot point.

	Yours,     zeropoint

 
 
 
 
Contact Information 
 
 
 
 
Fourth Millennium
 zap.dnai@rcn.com
 
 (510) 761-4602
toes show picture is fake
 
  
 

In-House Counter

LE FastCounter