1000h.txt
...............  zeropoint =>
These two articles are grist for the consideration of the functioning
of Jupiter described by the in-house paradigm.  There is likely a 
picture on disk and likely distributed to all showing the birth of a 
Jupiter by ejection from its sun.  The paradigm recognizes a Jupiter,
a dynamo of magnetism, a metallic orb, liquid hydrogen, as the third
curvature of the ninth dimension.  

The ninth dimension is itself the "three dimensional introversion" of 
the hyperspherical body (blackhole) birthing it as the torus, the donut, 
to itself.  The birth of those suns which are the galaxies of the ninth 
dimension, which we call the universe.  However, the universe is the 
blackhole itself, of which there are myriad.  Each universe communicates
with every other in an intimate manner consistent with their being 
gradients within a subfunction of the singularity; in this case, the
principal singularity of the cosmos itself, its first curvature.

The tenth dimension is the "realm" of the described hyperspherical body, 
the multiverse.  The blackhole or the "zero point field" is a tenth 
dimensional body which is constituent to the functioning of the first
curvature of the cosmos through its own ultradense region, the curvature 
described by the assertion of duality, at the level of the linear, but 
as charge, chirality and some other qualities.  This first curvature is 
premised by the duality of being and not being, pre and post vacuum 
genesis.  

This is the curvature beyond which light may not yet shine.  
This is referred to as the tail of the irrational component of pi or 
PHI that makes the steep and asymptotic drop into or extrusion out of 
the zero point.   The action over the zone of decoupling had been 
described as the same action of the irrational.  

This is an ERROR.                      ON MY PART

The decoupling is either/or and not asymptotic; so this premises the 
invariable oppositeness of charge to a charged hypersphere by its own
torus.  

The same reversal of quality across the zone of decoupling pertains to 
neutral bodies.  This is also the same dynamic described for the 
macrocosmic boundary between Itself and man, who images (imaged) 
perfectly the creator on the other side of the act of creation, Vacuum 
Genesis. 

The reversal of decoupling is the transiting of the Event Horizon.  This 
is an event that is approached via the irrational tail of pi or PHI as 
one completes the warping through pi toward zero and perfect symmetry. 
One has to use ONESELF in the mentation of the thought if one is to 
consider the macrocosmos itself, and not a device or a sub intellectual
endeavor which is a science or an academic discipline.  I have begged 
that one consider the approach to the eleventh dimension out of one's 
ego as like cresting the top of a hill at high speed and descending 
the other side or like topping a "Russian Mountain" (roller coaster.) 
The induction of this condition, that of the quality of the first 
curvature, is the induction of the condition referred to as "folding 
space" when warp one is effected.  This is as nicely accomplished by 
element 115 in the drive described at lazar.htm; or by means of an
histeresis drive at its highest setting; or the final third of a vortex
of an energy device effecting temporal fluctuations; the resolution of
the tip of the triangular saucer's mandelbrot drive.

Achieving critical mass is crossing the Event Horizon.  Actually, I 
would say it better as gaining the nature of mass, inasmuch as I 
describe the neutrino as mass and the neutrino being the decreasing 
numbers of regions of symmetry along the scalar charge gradient 
9warping) toward the boson or zero point or interdimensional gate 
or neutral zone.  The zero point can be called vacuum or the space 
providing the multiplication can be called vacuum or the condition 
antecedant to creation can be called vacuum.  

The predicament of Lucifer is the requirement that it conform the 
asymptotic, which it totally fears to do, before it can effect its 
will, which it cannot otherwise do: to birth space/time/matter out 
of the function of its own past, impossible.  The nature of the sinister
[left-handed, levo-rotary] plot is such that one must always remember
that the forces of evil are weak and PAST, that the entirety of one's 
history and human history SINCE ADAM, in the context of inaction 
prior to the addition of Adam to the gene pool of humanity by his 
becoming Cro Magnon out of lesser forms of homo sapiens, is to be 
condensed.     In other words: LUCIFER IS TRYING TO EFFECT A FLUX
CAPACITOR TO ACCOMPLISH AN AMBITION, but Lucifer is not itself a 
flux capacitor, like ourselves individually and potentially as an
aggregate species.  God Almighty can be described as "Flux Capacitation"

The entire history of society since the beginning of "civilization" by
Nimrod, as stated in the Old Testament, is to be condensed and strung
out as a storyline or script.  When the Gray says to the parent: "This
child is ours," or "this baby belongs to us,"  the actually very 
stupid Gray is behaving in terms of the functioning of memory we are 
told of by Dr Bill Wilkies through the post submitted that describes 
memory as rooted in the zero point or vacuum, which that subspace 
creature who is Lucifer is not.  Lucifer cannot gain the boson.  Rather,
Lucifer is using these creatures to sort the timeloop of 10,000 years.
The paralysis one feels is historical.  Man did nothing before Adam 
occurred here, he was inert to interventions by others, being "clear" 
or in the Dream Time.  Adam cathected this inaction with his coming 
into existence, so he did nothing and was declined a bit in terms of
gender: two bodies.  Upon the untoward action which began the declination
of the pure torus into its substructuring, which we see in the heavens 
as the formation of galaxy class suns,  the timeloop was "fractured." 
This is to say: "The Sacred Vessel" is broken, as per Kabbala.  The 
singularity which is the torus in its pure and freshly created Platonic 
nature is declined through each of the functions substituent to the 
dimensional singularity the torus/"universe" is as a three dimensional
inversion or extroversion of a hypersphere.   The creature reminds us 
that we do now and for thousands of years sacrificed to Lucifer as 
gifts the bodies of our children.  We presently allow foster parents
to possess the children of others from whom they are seized for any 
"reason."  We contracted with the darkness to take our children to 
keep them happy and to hopefully get technology.  THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE 
between this "sacrifice" and the placing of the firstborn as well as 
dissenters into the fires about the metal god called Moloch, the bull.
The ogres are FOLLOWING the lives they have been able to trace through
many lifetimes; these do not have problems with attention spans since
they are not beholden to a NOW in their deviations, NOW being the 
zero point they cannot access.  They have no true memory,  these are
parasites on time.   To gain time is to gain spatiality, a body.  The 
human body is atomized as the individual,  the group functions are 
injured and malignantly kept that way.  False structures of order are
crafted to patch together a pseudo singularity made of human life, 
this by a parasite, by Evil.

The authority of Lucifer in its bold declarative statements is based 
on hour history of conformity with and tribute to Lucifer.  Lucifer 
who only as darkness could be a creator of light THE COMPLETION of 
the singular from the stage of the above described premise of duality 
in existing and not existing, not beyond that, the process of creation
cannot exist in the uncreated or in the Throne Room,  can only be 
process.  Lucifer can only invest that which willfully conforms its
nature.  That which is sent "into "The Pit" is the totem Lucifer offers
reality as the required function of asymptotic folding of space/time/
matter (which it cannot effect.)   Lucifer sends its minions, slaves, 
tools, stepping-stones to hell, "brings" them to hell.  It is not true 
that since God Almighty is a spirit that it, Lucifer, also a spirit, 
can have no body, acquire a body, and return to spirit fully potentiated 
just like God.  Elohim [whom Lucifer would be like if it could] can be 
material and subsume the body in love again, "revert to light," I have
been calling this.  Lucifer is the process of the effecting of lumination.
kidnapping is not "acquiring" a body.  A picture of a cup of tea is not
a cup of tea. 

Remember,  many many many hundreds of millions, billions of babies have
been murdered, for the reason that they are so precious, and none other.

Do see the hand of the Babylonish Secret Society in the nature of the 
actions of abductors and implanters and eaters and torturers and otherwise
abusers of Human Being.  If one looks carefully, one will see that each
society serves a role in a dynamical process that does not seem to be 
perceived by the protagonists, whose competitions seem to be strive 
among themselves.  The process of accomplishing symmetry requires the 
reduction of the number of factors to one and then zero.  You have of 
course noted that whenever the wicked do things, they describe and 
seem to perceive those acts in terms that are alarming stupid and crude.
The evil are "flatworlders" par excellence.  They all seem to be in the
"lucky rabbits foot" league.  They don't know what they are doing. 
Nor does Lucifer.   

Intelligence is based on memory.

So, the galaxy completes its fractaled imaging of the cosmic structure with
that third curvature which is magnetism and which magnetism dominates a
solar system.  The sun is, hyperspatially, rotating within the orbit of
its own Jupiter, as a stator past a magnet.  The solar is also subject 
to other suns, star clusters, the center of the galaxy, galaxy clusters 
and finally the magnetic "field" of the tenth dimensional body responsible
for the orientation of the "corkscrews in the sky",  imaged at the site in,
/astronomy/astro.htm.  The magnetic fields of celestial bodies are oriented
by the supernal magnetic field.  The graphic at the site actually helps
one only to visualize the "corkscrew" that is a magnetic field coming into
existence about a coalescing or accreting sun, a galaxy.

The articles below declare in a highly muted fashion what the importance 
of a Jupiter is to the formation of a biosphere.  The general search for 
the Grand Union is not adequate in this level of articulation of the 
explanation of the existence of the curious human observer.  The Theoretical
physicist, the astrophysicist, the cosmologist, ourselves, man.  
The orderliness of reality is a bit deeper than Keppler's geometry and the
presumption that the mechanical sweeping up of planets is the extent of 
Jupiters' effects when their orbits are elliptical.  The positive nature of
the role of a Jupiter is not appreciated.  Having a "Van Allen Belt" is 
prequisite to a planet on which creatures can develop technology using 
vacuum energy.  It is a premise that the VAn Allen Belt is to vanish after 
2013, having been wildly boosted and then drained to fuel weapons and 
other chicanery.   One is again referred to the conclusion of Arthur C.
Clarke's  "Childhood's End".  The action of Jupiter's magnetic field on the
crystalline structure of Earth's core generates lightening the ionosphere, 
and much else.  All of these celestial conditions conform the "vibratory 
signature" of a galaxy/solar/planetary environment, as well as those 
of the creatures they spawn.  

The neutrino pathways trace the structuring after the fashion of the 
paradigmatic description of the string of the dimensions.  These are the
"graceways" of the squooshily biblical.  Speculations about Draconis 
are made in terms of two Jupiters or no Jupiter or the nature of the 
binary star system mentioned elsewhere.

................  <= zeropoint

From: UFOLAWYER1@aol.com
Subject: [CAUS updates] -  Planetary Mysteries--American Astronomical Society

Dear CAUS Members: 

On this Monday CAUS shares with you two intriguing articles from the recent
American Astronomical Society meeting in Austin, Texas. Consider the
implications:

1) Orbits of Other Distant Planets Oval -- Not Circular

Source: Public Affairs Office; San Francisco university

SAN FRANCISCO, CA, January 9, 1999 -- Unlike the nine planets that
make circular orbits around our Sun, all nine of the 17 extrasolar
planets which are in distant orbits around their host stars travel in
oval-shaped paths.

This surprising pattern suggests that our heliocentric perspective
skews expectations of worlds elsewhere. The circular paths of planets
in our solar system may require special conditions for them to
acquire and maintain their more stable circular orbits.

"For the first time we have enough extrasolar planets out there to do
some comparative study. We have the statistical basis for starting to
consider how our solar system compares with other planetary systems,"
said astronomer Geoffrey Marcy, University Distinguished Professor of
Science at San Francisco State University. "We are realizing that
most of the Jupiter-like planets far from their stars tool around in
elliptical orbits, not circular orbits, which are the rule in our
solar system."

Marcy, a member of the most prolific team of extrasolar planet
discoverers, presented this emerging trend in a press conference
today at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Austin,
Texas. He is the lead author of a paper describing the conclusions
that has been submitted for publication to the Astrophysical Journal.

Among the nine planets with elliptical orbits is a new discovery.
This planet orbits the star HD168443 in the constellation Serpens,
the Snake. It was detected during observations with the world's
largest telescope at the W.M. Keck Observatory atop Mauna Kea on the
island of Hawaii.

The new planet has an orbital period of 58 days and orbits at an
average distance of 0.28 Astronomical Units from its star (one A.U.
equals the mean distance from the Earth to the Sun). The eccentricity
of its orbit -- the degree that it deviates from a circular path --
is 0.54, about ten times the eccentricity in the orbit of Saturn. The
other eight extrasolar planets that orbit farther than 0.2 A.U. from
their host stars all have orbital eccentricities greater than 0.1.

Debra Fischer, a post-doctoral researcher at San Francisco State and
part of the planet-finding team, said, "With 10 or 20 of these
[planets around other] stars you can start looking at what's normal
and what's not normal."

And elliptical orbits appear to be the norm for planets as massive as
Jupiter. As these Jupiter-mass planets careen close to their host
stars and swoop back out again, their powerful gravitational
attraction might sweep aside any smaller worlds around the same star.

Scientists engaged in the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence
(SETI) have begun to ponder the implications of the orbital trend for
their endeavor. "This does represent a bit of a wet blanket on the
search for intelligence in the galaxy," said Marcy. "The big bullies
may wipe clean the terrestrial planets in those planetary systems,
rendering them void of any Earth analogues."

However, Marcy pointed out that about five percent of stars in the
Galaxy are found to have Jupiter-mass planets within 3 A.U. That
leaves 95 percent of stars that may lack such world-wrecking planets;
any of those stars could conceivably harbor life-bearing planets.

"What we're learning is that 95 percent of Sun-like stars don't have
these wildly wacky Jupiters in such close-in orbits, and I would say
that's quite good news for the SETI efforts," said Marcy.

Researchers seeking other worlds with intelligent life can also take
heart in a second trend exhibited by extrasolar planets. Nearly half
of those found so far are smaller than or equal to two Jupiter
masses, and above four Jupiter masses the number of planets drops off
sharply. There are more smaller planets out there, just as in our
solar system. "This mass distribution is pointing toward a plentitude
of planets smaller than Saturn and Jupiter," said Marcy.

Theorists still have their work cut out for themselves in explaining
how the nine extrasolar Jupiter-like planets developed their
eccentric orbits. Four plausible scenarios have been proposed. One
posits that when enough large planets orbit a star in close
proximity, they generate a gravitational slingshot that projects the
planets into elongated orbits. Another idea is that a passing star
rips through the heart of a solar system and perturbs planetary orbits.

The perpetrator could also be an orbiting companion star. Sixty-four
percent of Sun-like stars have a companion star, and HD168443 appears
to be part of one such binary pair. (Another recently announced
extrasolar planet orbits the solitary star HD210277, so that planet's
elliptical orbit demands a different explanation.)

The fourth scenario points to the protoplanetary disk, out of which a
planet first takes form from dust and gas. The disk may somehow
permanently perturb the planet's orbit. Theorists who could comment
further on these various ideas include Fred Adams (University of
Michigan), Greg Laughlin (University of California at Berkeley), Doug
Lin (University of California at Santa Cruz), Fred Rasio (MIT) and
Stu Weidenschilling (Planetary Science Institute in Tucson, Arizona).

Research colleagues of Geoffrey Marcy's include Debra Fischer (San
Francisco State University), R. Paul Butler (Anglo-Australian
Observatory), Steven Vogt (U.C. Santa Cruz), Kevin Apps (University
of Sussex, England), and Michael Liu (U.C. Berkeley).

In New Discoveries, a Planetary Mystery

Sunday, January 10, 1999 <A HREF="aol://4344:104.nytcopy.6445375.574106743">Copyright 1999 The New YorkTimes</A> By John Noble Wilford

   AUSTIN, Tex. -- In a stunning run of discoveries over the last three years, astronomers have observed 17 nearby stars that appear to be orbited by planets more or less the size of Jupiter. The most recent detection of a planet around a star other than the Sun was described here Saturday. 

   But while astronomers continue the search for more such objects, they have now seen enough to be puzzled by an emerging pattern: None of these extrasolar planetary systems seems to resemble the Sun's family of planets. Is this an observational fluke? Or is the solar system a cosmic oddball? 

   At a meeting of the American Astronomical Society, scientists reviewed the mystifying evidence. All of these objects are found in orbits much closer to their parent stars than Jupiter, the solar system's giant, is to the Sun. Astrophysicists could only speculate how such large planets, ranging in mass from one-half to 10 times the mass of Jupiter, can orbit so close to a star and survive what must be destabilizing gravitational stresses. 

   Other studies reveal that many of the stars orbited by large bodies typically have two to three times more heavy elements than exist in the Sun. And except for the extrasolar planets extremely close to their host stars, most of these objects appear to travel in orbits unlike those of planets around the Sun. 

   "For the first time, we have enough extrasolar planets out there to do some comparative study," said Dr. Geoffrey W. Marcy of San Francisco State University, who is the leading discoverer of these objects. "We are realizing that most of the Jupiter-like planets far from their stars tool around in elliptical orbits, not circular orbits, which are the rule in our solar system." 

   Dr. Marcy noted that 9 of the 17 detected extrasolar planets sweep relatively close to their stars and then swing far out again, giving an oval shape to their orbital paths. The others travel in more circular orbits, presumably because they are even closer to their stars and are regulated by gravitational tides. One of these is only four million miles from its star and takes only 4.2 days to complete its revolution, or "year." 

   An elliptical orbit was observed for the most recently discovered extrasolar planet, around the star HD 168443 in the constellation Serpens, the Snake. This new planet, Dr. Marcy reported Saturday, orbits its star once every 58 days at an average distance that is nearer to the star than Mercury, with an 88-day orbit, is to the Sun. 

   The eccentricity of the newly discovered planet -- the degree that it deviates from a circular path -- is 0.54, about 10 times the eccentricity in the orbit of most solar system planets. 

   Theorists have proposed several possible explanations for such eccentric orbits. When enough large planets orbit a star in proximity, perhaps they generate a gravitational slingshot that projects the planets into elongated orbits. Or perhaps a passing star has upset the delicate balance of these planetary systems. 

   In some cases, the planets could be perturbed because their star is part of a binary system, where two stars are locked in gravitational embrace. 

   If elliptical orbits appear to be common for other planets as massive as Jupiter, astronomers are wondering what different circumstances in the solar system keep mighty Jupiter and Saturn in circular orbits. It is not a trivial question, for the emergence of life on Earth probably depended on the answer. 

   Jupiter-size bodies plunging toward and away from their stars are likely to sweep aside smaller worlds, sending them crashing into the star or flying out of orbit into interstellar space. Current technology is incapable of detecting Earth-size planets around other stars, but they almost certainly could not exist near their star's warmth in a system so unsettled by large planets in wrecking orbits, Dr. Marcy said. 

   "The implications are also profound for the search for extraterrestrial life," Dr. Marcy said. 

   Yet of the all the Sun-like stars that have been studied so far by planet seekers, only 5 percent have been found to have Jupiter-mass planets in such eccentric orbits. Taking an optimistic view, Dr. Marcy said that leaves 95 percent of stars that may be free of these influences and could harbor habitable planets. 

   Although nearly all astronomers agree that these detected objects are extrasolar planets, a few holdouts are not so sure. They have raised the possibility that these are brown dwarfs, objects that formed like stars but lacked sufficient mass to support nuclear fusion in their cores. 

   Dr. William D. Cochran, an astronomer at the University of Texas here, said that too many of the objects had masses comparable to Jupiter's for them to be brown dwarfs. But at the meeting, he cautioned that they may not be planets, particularly because so many of them have eccentric orbits and are so close to their stars. They might be some new type of object unlike anything in the solar system. 

   "To find a new type of object would be an extremely exciting result," Dr. Cochran said. "Right now, we are still going to call them 'planets,' even though they may really be something slightly different." 

CAUS COMMENTARY:

Both articles suggest that not all is as science has thought.  What is more amazing is the arrogance of modern day science to dismiss anything about our reality as impossible, considering how little we do know about it and probably most of that is based upon incorrect interpretations of out-of-context information. 

Isn't it time scientists let go of 'if science cannot explain it, it doesn't exist' mindset?  Isn't it time to transcend our belief systems and attempt to comprehend the incomprehensible?  Why do we continue to limit ourselves and thus limit our reality? 

There was a time when People believed the Sun rotated around the Earth.  At another time People believed that the Earth was flat.  What is the common belief today which is just as inaccurate? 

Have an astronomical Monday and of CAUS...watch the skies!

Peter A. Gersten Director