From: "Fourth Millennium" Subject: CropCircles and graphics of quarks (from outside this list) To: "PROJECT OMICRON: James E. Tracy" X-Mailer: SPRY Mail Version: 04.10.06.22 From: "Fourth Millennium" Subject: CropCircles and graphics of quarks (from outside this list) To: silk@pac2.berkeley.edu, SKITA@BSAC.UCHC.EDU From: "Fourth Millennium" Subject: CropCircles and graphics of quarks (from outside this list) (original post below) Dear xxxx: Our budding intention is to gather those pictures of crop circles that are like the work in the Lawrence Berkeley National Labs, Nuclear Sciences Building foyer (Building 50), and to show these as representations of the graphics presented at the laboratory location on large boards with photographs showing the scientific work at the labs. We do not have a camera good enough to capture those "presentations". We shall contact staff/faculty at the labs and ask for copies of their library of photos out of which were taken the shots We saw. The snapshots are not of actual quarks but of handmade images. One of the images actually shows three spinning tops (children's toys) in three areas in an area inside a circle representing an elementary particle of matter. One of the tops is differently colored than the other, to show which quark it is. The quarks are mechanical counterparts to the xyz grid of space, it appears to "us", zeropoint, Sylvester H. Christie, a mere Sunday School graduate. We are sure that there are scientific publications that have these or similar representations. We shall go about getting these and will disseminate them when we do. Our lurking about the laboratories yesterday and at other times has to do with our seeking out certain nuclear/particle physicists at the labs, particularly Bruno Zumino, the originator of the notion of a Grand Unified Field, and his colleague, Mary K. Gaillard. Yesterday, we got as far as Building 50 when we realized that we did not have the exact addresses of these brains with me, dawdled around and descended the hill. we shall start off this morning with a call to Zumino, who has not returned an earlier call left with his office while he was away visiting Stephen Hawkings. (These scientists have tiny, dinky offices in UC Berkeley campus halls and government funded suites in the national labs. We are apprised of these two scientists by the vice-chair of the physics department. We are slinking up to these parties, but with increasing poise and vigor as the insight we possess is soaked into the body of knowledge or facts of the hard sciences, which it not only fits but coordinates and vivifies with a unifying logic that is the very nature of reality. We have no information about a URL for these pictures, only the physical site of their location at LBNL. Such "heavies", socially attributed awe and prestige, are intellectually isolated inasmuch as they are in a rarefied population of thinkers. Such persons are only irritated by "numbskulls" trying to say something intelligent about their fields of expertise and do tend to be stand-offish, to avoid being pulled into emotional quagmires by mewling admirers with no tuned grey matter at all. Until we are able to present the paradigm in succinct prose, the "geometry" of the eleven<=>five dimensional algorithm, we are leery of evidencing our understanding to those who, upon reading it, will hit the ground running. We would "position" ourselves with the GUF (grand unified field), but we will not wait past Labor Day, 1997. We have arrangements developing for publications to come out after that time. Our only ongoing communication with academia is with the folks at Engineering Anomalies at Princeton, (Brenda J. Dunne and Robert G. Jahn, Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research, School of Engineering & applied Science, Princeton Univ.; Princeton, NJ 08544-5263). Their precise interest is in the GUF to rationalize the findings of a massive computer analysis of "parapsychological" phenomenon that are undeniable: "Precognitive Remote Perception", "Consciousness, Randomness, and Information", "Experiments in Random Human/Machine Interactions". Our book on the paradigm, not published but available at the site, is "squooshy", not hard at all. In the several years since the completion of that work and the subsequent encountering of the people at Princeton, we had been pulling out our hair to liaise the paradigm with physics. This was eventually achieved after a long and tortuous and financially damaging series of accidents, "serendipities" centered around our watching out for improvements in technology that would render useless our particular approach to facilitating transportation by electric vehicles. Now, for the past 12 months, almost exactly, we have been able to resolve the paradigm with physics (astrophysics and high energy physics) in deepening detail that is approaching the limits of our intellectual capacity. Our background is in the health professions and we perceive the cosmos as a fiercely dynamic biological system collating psychology, sociology, medicine, chemistry, genetics, and unique methods of transportation without the constraints of inertia nor of light's speed, which has "pi" number of INTEGRAL accelerations/decelerations out of any "situation" in the curving and self-nesting cosmos that has NO SIZE! We are somewhat torn between wanting to re-enter the university system in some way, and fearing the stifling influences of the collegiate environment with which we are altogether familiar as student/staff participants, never faculty. But we do mildly fear that someone like a fellow named Winton who had decades ago been at Princeton, could apprehend the paradigm as it is spoken out, and refine it as he hears it, and defend the theses marvelously well. The nature of our "fear" is that inasmuch as we have no status whatever and are virtually bankrupted to arrive at this point, the narrow revelation of the paradigm in scientific application by high profile icons would shout down the realization of the paradigm in the overall matrix of human endeavor to which we would see brought the eluctation of total understanding. But our main pause is got from patience in letting the light "soak in" and diffuse through our own knowledge base, which it does expand. Our work (thinking) has brought us to the quark in seeking to define the circumstances in which certain devices, the motive ones in particular, are able to become unique entities in this domain of space between the atomic and the celestial. We understand how to go about making electromagneticly powered vessels of unique properties which might result in the phenomenon described in the post to which you respond. We are, in our intellectual investigation, studying the range of transitions occuring when these devices are turned on, engaging an inertia-free invironment, and then then incrementally and fully powered. The turning on of the device induces a phase-shift in the nuclei of the certain matter arranged in a particular way, layered lanthanide and a few other metals. The nuclei are "softened" releasing forces which seek to justify themselves in terms of the vehicle itself, "quarking" the quaternary structure of the device, no matter how big it is, when fully powered. We will see what we can do about the graphics. ....... zeropoint. From: xxxxxx To: zap@dnai.com Subject: CropCircles > >The coming into existence of the crop circles is a mystery << Greetings, Fourth - BruceMeland Fwdd me your posting which began with the reference, >graphical attempts by nuclear scientists to represent the quark are indistinguishable from certain crop circles << **=>original message A visit this morning to the National Labs has pointed out to me that the graphical attempts by nuclear scientists to represent the quark are indistinguishable from certain crop circles. Scientists have a huge handicap in their approach, which is to isolate a given condition or phenomena or entity and to tease out its properties available from such manipulation. Yesterday, I had a chat with the fellow who gave me my first drink of water in the midst of the dry spaces for philosopher-scientists, which, it occurs to me as I write, is a good moniker for this self; the fellow had told me of Nicolai Tesla by telling me I sounded like him. That fellow, who has no particular education, can handily race through abstract concepts of physics. During our chat, the fellow pointed out that a particular schema for generating energy was impotent owing to the inability to store energy. He then went on into the mechanisms by which a device could store energy in some dynamic fashion that is not mechanical. He got no further than placing it in a tree or something, an attempt to resolve the nature of the abstract problem in kind. How one parks energy is one thing, but the ability to think in terms of a string of inter-related functions or a process of many components, any or all of which may be achronic and invisible is not obvious in any pronounced degree among the scientists. It is the ability to pull together to unify matter and time and force and circumstance that is at the heart of the ultra technology which we browse about together under zeropoint's hopeful leadership, that is the basis of the devices we seek to be able to comprehend. It is pulling together of the perceived factors that allow one to approach comprehension. It is pulling together of an experimental situation to produce coherent phenomenon which do not come to be if one shoots a block with a laser in one room, gathers a plasma- cloud in another and attends or reads lectures about the segmented work of another. One of the impressive things about the Rory Johnsom motor is that the device plays handball with itself. Rory's thingy does one thing so that it can do another and another and another then finally harvests the energy as angular momentum and torque. Very few people can imagine the stuff between the pushing of a button and the overall or net effect of a device. The imagination of most produces only a "black box" with no definition of its function. That kind of a predicament is what characterizes the cosmos itself in the minds of scientists, a black box with mysterious workings within that performs a rudimentary task, such as move. The experiments of the laboratories are constructive of such predicaments. ................................................. And now the Philadelphia part... The coming into existence of the crop circles is a mystery which has, for me a couple of avenues of solution. The ship that was placed in the midst of four massively energized north poles ("counter-fluxed fields") and which disappeared did reappear a few times before settling down. One of the places it reappeared is a place it had been just before being moved tot he site where it was surrounded by the four destroyers, each with a fat generator on board. The men on board... some are here, some never returned, and some have been or did go back and forth from hyperspace. Those who are here are not in the best of psycho-spiritual health. The feeling of the victim when he began to revert to light without any of the sophistication of a saint is said by them to be extremely painful and frightening. That kind of an experience is what had sponsored my attempts to deal with gut experiences by talking of myoclonic spasms and nausea and the plasma craft, which is a happiness machine that produces no discomfort nor blacking out. I don't have exact data that would be helpful on how long beforehand had the ship been in the place where it reappeared. The fact that crop circles appear before one's eyes with no obvious means of their construction (have seen film that was physically, technically examined and found not the least bit wanting) suggests to me that vessels that have come and gone before are leaving traces in the same way as did the ship (forgot the name) of the Philadelphia experiment. It could be that the saucers are way up and that the designs are "skid marks", my first impression, of the near (high up and out of sight) or past presence of alien vehicles. What do you think? This vein of discussion is part of our moving toward the comprehension of time as a function of bounded chaos in parallel with the focus on the reassembly of light to a more inward or lower numbered fractal or "space". When we have wallowed for some productive time in the process of understanding time and light, we can return once again to the floorboard of the cosmos and see how much our mental grip is enhanced. zeropoint................later ** As I am fascinated by and have studied both quarks/ quantum theory and the CropCircles for years, you had my full attention. To my disappointment, however, this comparision was not further elaborated upon in your article. Would you have a reference (hopefully a URL) for me where I might see some of these quark graphics? I have not seen any graphical representation of these particles, and would be most interested to compare them for myself. I have dedicated the past 6 years of my life to studying the Circles, and have been to UK to visit and intensely explore scores of Formations over the past 5 years. I've also documented 6 CropCircles here in Washington and Oregon during the last 4 years. I'll be leaving again for England in a week to fly and record this Season's CropCircles, which, if the Season's openers are any indication, will indeed represent a 'bumper crop' ... ;-) My especial interest in studying the Formations, other than entering them to interact with their Energies, are the crop lays. I've learned that by studying the lays, one is able to obtain an idea of the Energies being used for their Transmissions. I've written a monograph entitled "An Hypothesis: The Transmission of a CropCircle", which is now posted to my HomePages on The CropCircle Connector website. The URLs for both are below. I'd be interested in your feedback if you'd be willing to check it out. In the first part of the book (36 pages with many photographs and graphics) I cover the Transmission process itself. In the second half, I offer my thoughts on Who the CircleMakers are, Why the Circles might be Arriving now, and What they might 'mean'. I am delighted that your evaluation of the Oliver's Castle video footage supports the tape's validity. That IS, indeed, how the Formations are Transmitted! I've written, and have gathered from others, many reports on this tape in my investigation of it. I reached the same conclusion that you did: the tape is squeaky clean. Thanks for helping to publicize that fact, as well as bringing to the fore the topic of the CropCircles. As I mention to those who attend my Presentations, the Circles don't come up in every-day conversations. Please tell your friends about what you've seen and learned here tonight ... I appreciate your insights! - ilyes -- - ilyes National Coordinator Centre for CropCircle Studies / US Network > New Arrival: http://www.marque.demon.co.uk/connector/stone97.html explore Mark and Stuart's award-winning website, The CropCircle Connector: http://alpha.mic.dundee.ac.uk/ft/crop_circles/anasazi /connect.html >visit my HomePage - and *check out my Monograph* "An Hypothesis: The Transmission of a CropCircle"! http://alpha.mic.dundee.ac.uk/ft/crop_circles/anasazi /ilyes.html