Repeat posting was: Vacuum Energy Production? (0/2) ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| <---- Begin Forwarded Message ----> From: zeropoint Subject: Vacuum Energy Production? (0/2) ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| To: QUANT From: "G.D.Mutch" Subject: Re: Vacuum Energy Production? (0/2) >from zeropoint :: "GD Mutch............. donut00a.gif and the below are what one needs for gravigenic motivation and navigation. The disk manipulates the cloud. One uses the disk to manipulate the cloud. The gif file itself is the blue-print." >On Thu, 2 Jan 1997, Bruce Meland wrote: >To Zap: was the simple experiment listening or was the experiment not >included? Thanks Bruce >To: >(from outside ZEROPOINTER land) An OXYGEN ATOM with its 8 electrons in orbit around 1 theoretical proton. You have to assume a theoretical proton for this theory to work. But it can be arranged to have the actual proton where figure 5 would be fixed and still have the theory workable, that's no problem. Lets keep it simple for now. 1st frame of motion. 15 ------------- | 8 | 1 | 6 | 15 Watch the transition of No 8, 1 and 6 in this frame when compared ------------- to the next frame. Notice how all the numbers of this fame(no matter | 3 | 5 | 7 | 15 which way you add them) all add to the value '15'. This proves that ------------- this atom's energy frame is conserved, an is in a stable state. | 4 | 9 | 2 | 15 The numeric values represent electron spin, in any magnitude. ------------- No decimals, nature does not deal with fractions of matter. 15 15 15 15 2nd Frame of motion. 15 ------------- | 9 | 2 | 4 | 15 Watch the transition of No 8, 1 and 6 in this frame when compared ------------- to the next frame. | 1 | 6 | 8 | 15 ------------- | 5 | 7 | 3 | 15 ------------- 15 15 15 18 <---Notice the value 18 at this diagonal only. 15 + 3 = 18 (+3 units) 3rd frame of motion. 15 ------------- | 7 | 3 | 5 | 15 Watch the transition of No 8 , 1 and 6 in this frame when compared ------------- to the next frame. | 2 | 4 | 9 | 15 ------------- | 6 | 8 | 1 | 15 ------------- 15 15 15 12 <--- Notice the 12 at this diagonal only. 15 - 3 = 12 (-3 units) Back to 1st motion frame. 15 ------------- | 8 | 1 | 6 | 15 All the other electron spin values follow the same identical path ------------- around the theoretical center proton. This process never ends. | 3 | 5 | 7 | 15 I have only quoted 8,1,6 to allow you to understand better. ------------- | 4 | 9 | 2 | 15 ------------- 15 15 15 15 Actual electron orbits within these motion frames. (Slightly straighten out to allow for the ascii artwork.) 1 /\ Remember only 3 numbers were used here to better clarify a 8-----/--\-----8 persons understanding. \ / \ / 6__\/___6__\/__6 We have 3 triangles of 3 numbers using a motion frame of 3 x 3 /\ /\ figures. With is a total of nine super spin electrons. / \ / \ It is my belief that these super spin electrons are little donuts -----\--/----- formed of ether (electric fluid) and have a binary state charge. Ie 1 \/ 1 positive one end; negative at the other,an ether void in the 8 center producing a magnetic vortex attraction/repulsion force. Figure 1 Where does this electron force come from,you may ask. The originator may have used the positive and negative forces of the universe to bring about the desired spin in the ether bands around each planet. Example: positive forces --> ------------ --------- + \ / \ / ( \ / ) fully formed vortex spin in ether )( --> ) ( --> | ) ( |--> electrons/donuts / \ / \ ( / \ ) ------------ --------- - negative forces --> \ / -/- <-- Another view of the 3 x triangle electron orbits side on. / \ With figure 1. Does anyone notice the star of david triple triangle motion within the start to finish of these motions frames. This can be seen as 3 x 3 sided triangles : interlaced in the other two orbits. You can not see the triangle orbit 6 6 6 in this diagram as it is laying flat on its side to the viewer. This could also be seen as 2 x 3 sided pyramids one inverted on the other,and their center points matching precisely. Now, the very important diagonals: Remember the diagonals went 15 , 18 , 12 and back to 15 As these frames rotate and oscillate the frame becomes 'ONE WHOLE ATOM',and generates its own unit of charge at the prescribe diagonal. This important function allows this Atom to oscillate with a frequency and interlock with other Atoms to build up complex compounds and crystal structures eg. like cubic faced center etc. The fact that this atom projects +3 ,0 ,-3 from its top and bottom is no coincidence. I could have easily made this atomic square produce 6 or 9 or 1800 units of force from the diagonal. The figures 1 through 9 used in the frames are purer demonstrational; to allow people to follow along with my theory. By the way these electron orbits are not really triangle or square, but circular orbits in reality. The No1 rest frame should be drawn in the middle of the other two positive and negative frames. Eg. No2,No1,No3 or by atomic charge:+3, 0 , -3 but they are in fact in the correct order, as No3 goes back to No1 rest frame; shown below. Frames when drawn the right way up. No1 No2 No3 No1 No2 No3 etc... (0) (+3) (-3) | | | 8 9 7 3 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 5 6 4 6 4 5 ...additional frames... 9 7 7 8 8 9 2 3 1 | | | Diagonals 15 18 12 (0) (+3) (-3) (0) (+3) (-3) rest frame positive negative Remember, all other ways of adding these frames add to 15, we are only interested in the diagonal unit charge. +3 , 0 ,-3. All other path ways have no energy to give, or to be able to receive. All the orbital paths excluding the valid diagonal are all energy conserved. Notice the -3 , 0 , +3 then straight to -3 ? I beleive this keeps the atom spinning and prevents it from ever finding the equilibrium total rest state, and thus imparts energy back into the spinning electrons to keep them rotating around to form the atom...pertutual motion. As you will soon realize these electrons whirl around the hypothetical center causing ether to flow through the center or the diagonal. This forces the whole atom to take on the same ether flow as the tiny donut electrons,and shows how the atom is built up to make a slightly bigger donut with its magnetic vortex attraction/repulsion force in the center. This can then be extended on (in mechanical principle only) up to the macro of the cosmos. Yes matter from pure energy. Yes, the power to deform space is how matter is created from nothing but deformed space. Deformed by someone or something imparting a tremendous force into ether to form various electron/donut spins in the non-continuous ether pools of the cosmos. The tiny donuts/whirlpools/electrons can be imparted with such a force they can take millions of years to decay or fold back to primordial space. As these electrons fold back to primordial space it is my belief they are dislodged as a photon of visible light; then disappear back into the ether pools of the cosmos: like a drop of water returning to the ocean, awaiting the next force to impart energy into a given point in the ether, to produce a new electron spin. These forces are 'totally random' and allows many variations in spin rate and force charges. The above square theory shows you how these random orders of electron charge come together to make order out of chaos; order in the cosmos. Now You Know: Chaos Truly Has A Mathematical Order. Showing others my avenue of research may intimidate some people. I ashore you it is not my intention to do so. I merely wish to generate an interest in others that may lead to some more progress with this theory. Then again my above theory may fall flat on its face. Who knows. I still haven't tested this theory on larger elements to see if this frame or other frame sequences hold true. I have tested the squares right up to square 20 x 20 (400 electrons) and very interesting results have been found with the oscillation patterns. I have not found the motivation to research further into this area of study. THE ABOVE THEORY IS ONLY ONE FORMATION OF THE SAME MODEL AND IS FOR DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO CHANGE MY THEORY(S) IN MOMENTS NOTICE SHOULD OTHER INFORMATION AND DATA PROVE TO BE MORE SUPPORTIVE OR VALID. N.B. The above square theory is and extension of the law of the squares books by the famous Dr J.R.R.Searl. Full acknowledgement to Dr.Searl. I would appreciate feed back if anyone find this thread useful, please share all your findings with others. Don't let ego and greed cloud your better judgement. Regards G.D.&C.M.Mutch <---- End Forwarded Message ---->