From: zeropoint Subject: Subject: WARP DRIVOLOGY [101] #POST 003 |||||||| To: "THEORIST kreutzer, Bob" Gordon's reference and thinking are excellent. (BTW, the question about negative temperature should be considered in terms of tachyons or other phenomenon beyond the zero points defining it.) Actually, each of the "principles" which are the laws and phenemenon of the cosmos may be "trapped" or brought into play by clever contrivance of electromagnetic foci which themselves form various geometries within a corresponding array of geometries also controlled. The principal geometry is that of the sphere. Disking a sphere, so as to endow it with an effective radius, so as to engage the formulation of gravity given as the General Theory of Relativity, enables one to manipulate invisible but authentic geometries "painted" on the sphere by "warp drives" ( (+x,+y,+z), the three "prongs" of the Cartesian Grid System, an eighth of space, each with variable positive or negative charge (huge) and which warp drives are strategically situated about the sphere and which geometries effected by these "obversed" quadrants are "riveted" by the focal point on the disk (operating "pi" ) and which quadrants or drives may imply a cube, functionally definable as six four-sided pyramids sharing an apex which apex can be extrapolated in terms of a focal point on the disk, which focal point can be a standing wave caused by counter-rotating charged particles at the edge of the disk or at variable points along the radius. The radius of the cosmos is always ONE. To span the cosmos is but the roll of the disk one radius in any "direction" . An ability to power the rolling of the disk pi distance is to fathom all the dimensions of the cosmos and to present at the "shadow universe", which I see as the location of the hidden seven dimensions making up an eleven dimensional system coating both sides of a Mobius Strip. Anyway, this is how saucers work and why "free energy" has to be sought to be put into the vessel for such travel. I have not found free electrical energy: it may by definition not be possible. However, the energy which relocates the craft as it curves space is the only "free energy" I have found, the energy implied by the manipulation of circumstances implied by the General Theory of Relativity is a reflexive response with an extraordinary multiplier built in. The energy required by the warp drive to ENGAGE this "free energy" is not really free but is available by means of the disassociation of neutrons in an easily assembled flux capacitor or "high density charged cluster" device depending on arrays of metals including the lanthanide group and others like copper, platinum, gold, silver. The key clues are: 1. The cosmos is too stupid to know how big it is 2. Any engagement of a law of physics operates that law at the site of the device effecting the engagement. 3. Objects are visible. Principles are invisible. Principles interacting objects and principles are invisible. These three comprise vacuum fluctuations. Vacuum is the state of reality wherein all is enfolded into its noumenal format or is fully "nested". Soon, I shall be able explain sub atomic particles in an elegant and enlightening way, one most handily visualized. > > Does travelling faster than light necessarily mean that you go backwards > > in time? As you approach speed of light, time slows, and even at c, it may > > "freeze", but aren't we making an assumption that it starts going > > backwards after c? Or is there some proof that it does? "Gordon G. Bowman" writes: > Therefore the traveller never actually travels FTL. Of course, this > requires exotic matter (matter with negative energy) which may be > impossible. > To quote from the paper, > > "The basic idea can be more easily understood if we think for a moment of > the inflationary phase of the early Universe, and consider the relative > speed of separation of two co-moving observers. It is easy to convince > oneself that, if we define this relative speed as the rate of change of > proper spatial distance over proper time, we will obtain a value that is > much larger than the speed of light. This doesn't mean that our observers > will be travelling faster than light: they always move inside their local > light-cones. The enormous speed of separation comes from the expansion of > spacetime itself." > > -- > Gordon G. Bowman (gbowman@atlsci.com) Fourth Millennium, a partnership; Sylvester H. Christie, General Partner Public Relations, Financial Coordination Z.A.P., Zero Air Pollution, a partnership Design, Engineering, Manufacture Berkeley California __ ~/__|o\__ '@----- @'---(= Onward toward The Zero Point. We design and build electric vehicles, including wheelchairs since 1964. http://www.dnai.com/~zap/ ftp://ftp.dnai.com/users/z/zap/ (accessible through your browser)