MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Fourth Millennium" Subject: RE: RE: EDS review 005 To: "ZEROPOINTER" Bcc: , , , , , , , , , , , <71406.1040@compuserve.com>, , cbwalker@direct.ca, , , david.book@ibm.net, , , , , <75401.715@CompuServe.COM> , , , , , , , , , , , , , , < eng30309@leonis.nus.sg>, dreaminglark@peg.apc.org, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , X-Mailer: SPRY Mail Version: 04.10.06.22 You are correct everywhere. There was a sort of edge in the last of my statements. All of the forces of nature come into play here, beginning with strife in the center of the center layer, with the strong forces and the weak force and the frustration at becoming a singularity and no where to go with the electrons in the triply encircling chaos. Note phases changes in shimmer.txt. Everywhere you have phases changes one sees defined a fractal. You have "snowing"?, There is a liquid phase in the core as adjustment is attempted to optimize the geometries of the crystal inherent in the layer. That property would determine which metal, lanthanide or otherwise is optimal for that layer. Iron might not be suitable without the macro emphasis of the gravitic field. The larger nuclei of platinum or gold would (might) substitute the strong force for that particular factor in atomic or table-top sized applications, in the middle of the beebee. Neither current nor potential may "flow" in the sphere. The Coler Converter ...zeuger thingy paired has unique properties of stifled current flow, only TRANSITIONING by means of induction. Denied dominion by strong force, denied weak force accommodation, which may not be attempted, denied electrical flow, magnetism would assert, but there are no eighths of space available, each beebee has already been rendered a cube by the contacts with the others at six points, except at the surface, If the magnetic field of the contraption co-opts that response, and any "boli" are confounded by the array itself, then only creation is allowed, creation of electrons. The chaos engendered supplicates devine intervention that humans are to stiff-necked to do, The prayers of beebees are answered (remember: Dagon feared God and tried to pull his molten metal self the hell out of the room with the Jealous One (green with envy and pulling it all together to make it right... Palestinian minds in the null space of the dead (at the time) were given their chance to enjoy the worst of the worst hell for tampering with His Stuff). The other peoples, Assyria and Babylon KNEW ABOUT ALL THIS AND WERE AFRAID OF ISRAEL AND THOSE "JEWS" AMONG THEM OF THE KING-TRIBE. You asked the question we have been asking about the shape of the vacuum fluctuations in dealing with the points of contact. Months ago, we pushed forward the toroidal shapes around each point of contact between the balls as possible collectors for high density charged clusters, a term not used much lately. Naturally, the spheres are only approximately spheres. There is probably nothing so round as a fundamental particle of nature, including and especially a neutron star, beautiful isn't it... those of you who saw the Mysteries in Deep Space series, trilogy. There is likely to be all kinds of stuff happening in terms of escapement between layers and balls of stuff other than that of fluctuations and fractal stuff. This would speak to the perfection (perfectibility ... directions to be taken in experimental investigation of the device.) The Coler thing looks superior and more efficient and cheaper. I will try now to send the stuff referred to in the CORRECTION post. Direct contact and current flow, guarentable (?) by a load, are to be kept in mind in thinking of the workings of the device, but the no-see-um "forces" and ZEROPOINT FIELDS involved tend to get neglected. One does not neglect them with the Assyrian bent of mind, which COUNTS ON I N D U C T A N C E and wields it, a principle, a noumenal activity, the vacuum fluctuation between plates, in design and function. Very smart those Germans. Saxons are among the Germans, but there are two sets of Saxons. One is the Anglo-Saxon, the Saxon of which is derived from: Isaac's sons. The Teutonic Saxon is derived from "saec", knife, and wielder, "knife-wielder" There are doodles and curlicues in Saxon thinking that disable huge strands of Anglo-Saxon thinking. Mainly, the ideosynchrasy has to do with a highly structured and INFINITELY LONG history of thought and mental eventuality in the Anglo-Saxon, the Angle being the descendants of Israel who came or went north by boats beginning some time after getting going in Canaan. Israel had a strong "Pelagic" component. The isles referred to in the bible are "The Isles", the United Kingdom, with its nasty foot on Ireland, where concentrated the second tribe, Simeon. The disablement comes of the most savage ridicule current in Saxon and many saxonized societies. The willingness to venture is attenuated, that is: to venture intellectually as an individual is rarely afforded the Saxon unless he is part of a subset in which the tuning of the culture is highly refined. The upper classes MUST shield themselves from the vulgar. The curse is in the refusal of the highly moneyed to insert an infrastructure in the national "plant" that would nurture each and every citizen in every way. Presently, the curse is that we have, as the west, not done that globally, after we took coal and iron and made guns and hard ships. When the nations with kilns and iron and coal, especially England where the coal and iron were next to each other, got going, they would have "topped off" their societies... 100% comfort, literacy, health, happy, the nation of the English (and other Western) could have been a structural upper class to billions of increasingly wealthy people. The centuries and the past 52 years as well in a sore way, have been wasted. It pays to think in terms of the zeropoint fields themselves, as you astutely observe and insist, @bobkreutzer. Can you perhaps recall the several mentionings of the nature of the vacuum fluctuations engendered by CONTINUAL RUSHING OF ELECTRO-DYNAMIC SURFACES PAST EACH OTHER IN THE counter rotating wheels; also, what the collective effect(s) is (are)? From: "Kreutzer, Bob" If galvanic action between metallic layers is occurring, then a magnetic field is being generated, no? If so, then the inherent magnetic field of the spokes of Ezekiel's wheels would be the basis for the energizing (self exciting) of it's counterrotating counter part. Now, we need to think of how to manipulate (form and location of) the boli. This relates to the idea that the EDS are not stimulated by current flow via direct contact conduction. Bobk. >---------- >From: Fourth Millennium[SMTP:zap@dnai.com] >The likelihood is that the efficiency of the metals used, their >proportions and orderings, is based on the effecting of an >electromagnetic field. Shimmer.txt locates the controlling layer, for >the magnetic field, on the middle layer, with the central layer >determining orientation. > >It does not seem that current flows inside the beebees, which are the >basis for this exploration, from the reported and "seen" flux capacitor >which was not actually demonstrated on the television show. It does >not seem that there is some kind of nuclear activity inside the >spheres, only in the surrounding environment, beginning with the ring >current. > >The input voltage may not be a current passing through the array, it >may be applied to generate a "contexting" field which stimulates the >beebees to react in a manner described in blow02a.gif. I don't know if >the voltage is a "drop" or is a fluctuating field which inspires the >creation of electrons, which would make it a true and inexhaustible >vacuum energy device. > >The behavior of the electrons in either case, nuclear - dissociation of >neutrons, or the generation of "space" electrons, is unclear in the >circumstances of the beebees each being in contact with six other >beebees, except at the "surface" where there are five or fewer contacts >of those beebees with others toward the center of the mass. The fact >of the contacts each beebee makes with the others would suggest that >the individual beebee is frustrated to ascertain its own polarities. >The flow of current would then be through the surface in the same way >as in an ordinary battery - through the mass toward the surface or a >collector hooked to a load. > >It is not likely there is any kind of fancy mind work we can come up >with that will clarify this outside of experimentation or from >aggregation of certitudes from ZEROPOINTERs. > >It is clear though that there does have to be an environment where the >iteration of the cosmic curvature is replicated locally inorder to get >the act of creation. Three effective turns yields creation.... > >The first universe (tenth dimension) makes the turn of one radian, this >causes three layers of structure in that universe, each a subsidiary. >The completion of the ten dimension's (first fractal's) turns in the >third level, equivalent to the planetary in that universe, yields the >creation of the ninth dimension. The second radian yields galaxies, >suns and planets. The (mooned with a biosphere - the various phases of >matter also) planet affords the completion of the second radian. The >third radian is the existence of life forms or Platonic man of one type >or another. The full circle is the individuation of man out of the >prototype, the pi-eth space, as we have been calling it, the fourth >fractal. Already this is highly philosophical. The third radian is >the collaboration of the phases of complex matter in the aggregation >which is the third universe, the third fractal or the eighth dimension. > > >When light is able to escape the original birthing explosion of reality >into matter, TO DECOUPLE, it sets the model for the subsequent >reiterations of that act out of the "bottom", the first wheel of >density, of the fractal. The decoupling out of the eighth dimension is >represented by the biblical "fall". I remind that God did not say that >man was created or talk in terms of the completion of the creation of >man with the heavenly host until after Eve had gotten things going with >the second sin, the first sin was just standing there looking at the >tree of life - perceiving the fractal set. Choosing the tree of life >would have amounted to the "turning of the Shakti", which Joseph >Campbell talks about in the talk - lecture recommended to be read or >viewed. (The lecture details the actions of the zeropoint field in its >fulminations to become matter.) > >The beebees complete the turning of pi and therefore effect creation - >of electrons in this application or "circumstance". > >zeropoint. > > > >From: "Fourth Millennium" >Subject: RE: RE: EDS review 004 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||| > >From: "Kreutzer, Bob" > >Not a clue. The ideas for approaching it might be: 1. choose metals >close >to each other on the galvanic series table to minimize reaction. 2. Do >the opposite. 3. Choose metals of increasing atomic number. 4. Do the >opposite . These ideas are in relation to electrical stuff . The >magnetic questions of my post related to using magnetic layers, both >electrically conductive, semi, and non-conductive. Like I said, I'm >fishing, although I'm leaning on an iron core just as a baseline. I'm >thinking that picking materials that have some ordering corresponding >to the declination of the first three fractals might be harmonious, but >this is just a W.A.G. The cold nuclear reaction suggests that you might >not want the outer surface so electrically active which seems to imply >that you would want more magnetic activity. This is a lot like the >earth >GIF. Magnetic core, conductive inner, siliceous crust, low pressure >plasma activation (solar wind et. al.). But where would be the >"surface"? >Bob K. > > >>From: Mike Simmons > >>>From: "Kreutzer, Bob" >> >>>I was trying to get some direction on how to figure out how to choose >>>the materials for the different layers ( galvanic corrosion is a >>>problem with the current metals), also, the sequence of those >>>materials. >> >>What did you have in mind, Bob? Do you have any random guesses at the >>'recipe'? >>Also, what are the 'current metals' which you are referring to? >> >>I have heard of Nickel-Palladium-Nickel on thermostat balls... maybe >>Nickel-Palladium-Copper .... layers approx 20 microns thick... total OD >>100 microns.... >> >>George Miley, et al. (Univ Illinois C-U) formulated a 'Swimming >>Electron' theory that sought to correlate the phenomena with the >>diffusivity of the metals into one another, the electrical >>conductance, and the thickness >>of the layers. >>They found the thin layers flaked and oxidized (I think this is the >>same problem you are experiencing, but not sure). Also, this experiment was >>performed on a multilayer plate, not on multilayer balls with much >>smaller surface area. >> >>Later, >>Mike >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>--- >> Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change. >> >> E-Mail: mars.or.bust@mail.utexas.edu >> URL: http://ccwf.cc.utexas.edu/~simmons/ >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ > <---- End Forwarded Message ---->