Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 20:45:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <2.2.16.19961209204506.65d7d7b0@pop.igc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: zeropoint <zap@dnai.com>
From: Barry Carter <bcarter@igc.apc.org>
Subject: Re: Brown's Gas
Sender: bcarter@igc.org

Dear Friends,

There is an excellent web site on Brown's Gas.  You can find the first page
on this subject at two sites:

http://www.primenet.com/~ltseung/brown1.htm 
http://www.tstonramp.com/~ltseung/brown1.htm

This is definitely the definitive site on Yull Brown's gas.  There are
several downloadable images of Brown's gas in action.

By the way I saw Dennis Lee's demo in Idaho last year.  It was pretty
impressive.  Is he really selling a product?

Here is something of interest that I posted recently on the Alchemy forum.

Dear Friends,

Several theories have been offered regarding a possible mechanism for
transmutation.  I would like to offer a couple more that I am aware of.
According to the theoretical quantum physicist Matti Pitkanen on his web
page at http://blues.helsinki.fi/~matpitka/exo.html :

>A general T(opological) G(eometro)D(ynamics) based mechanism for 
>superconductivity in biosystems is proposed. The mechanism relies on many 
>sheeted nature of TGD:eish spacetime. Some atomic valence electrons can drop 
>from atomic spacetime sheet to some 'lower' spacetime sheet: this gives rise 
>to exotic atoms and 'electronic alchemy'. 

This "electronic alchemy" theory supposes that:

>The exotic counterpart of atom with charge Z would behave chemically as 
>element with Z-n(val), where n(val) is the number of exotic valence 
>electrons. In particular, 'electronic' alchemy becomes in principle possible 
>by dropping some electrons on the lower condensate level.

In other words, the atom has the same nucleus and the same number of
electrons but because two or more of the electrons are Cooper paired they
become invisible to chemical processes and electron dependent measuring
technology.  This means that, for example, lead would suffer an apparent
loss of two of its 80 electrons when they paired up and the lead would then
appear chemically and electronically similar to platinum which has 78
electrons.  It should be fairly easy to identify instances of "electronic"
alchemy since the atomic weight would remain virtually the same.

I personally don't totally subscribe to Pitkanen's theory that alchemical
transmutation occurs primarily through the transformation of the atom by its
apparent loss of electrons as the result of their Cooper pairing.  This may
be a stage in the alchemical process but I believe that it is followed by an
actual splitting of the nucleus resulting from the superdeformation of the
nucleus as it elongates in response heat or other energy which is added when
all of the electrons of a given atom are Cooper paired.  This process is
described in:

Scientific American
March 1990 
New Radioactivities
Walter Greiner, Aurel Sandulescu
pp. 58-67

"It is now known that the atomic nucleus is a more or less spherical object
whose diameter is  about a few Fermis--a unit of measure equal to one
quadrillionth of a meter, or simply 10-15 meter. Electrons orbit the nucleus
at a distance of about 100,000 Fermis. (For comparison, the  radius of the
moon's orbit is only about 30 times greater than the diameter of the earth.)
Packed in this Fermi-size nucleus is nearly all of the mass of an atom and
all of its positive  electric charge. The mass of the nucleus comes mainly
from nucleons. Protons carry the positive charge.

The structure of the nucleus arises from two types of interactions: strong
and  electromagnetic. As a result of the strong interaction, or nuclear
force, protons bind to  neutrons and to each other. The nuclear force binds
nucleons very tightly but acts over a very  short range. To separate two
neutrons that are one Fermi apart, for instance, requires an energy of about
one million electron volts.  On the other hand, only about 10 electron volts
is needed to dissociate two nucleons that are 10 Fermis apart.

As a result of the electromagnetic interaction, or Coulomb force, protons
repel other  protons. Although the Coulomb force is weaker than the nuclear
force, it acts over a much longer range.  If two protons are one Fermi
apart, the Coulomb force is about 100 times weaker than the nuclear force.
Yet at a distance of 10 Fermis, the Coulomb force is about 10 times stronger
than the nuclear force."

The authors follow with a rather long description of various examples about
how an atomic nucleus can superdeform so that it is no longer "more or less
spherical" but develops an elipsoid or figure eight shape with two nuclear
centers.  These centers are far enough apart that the nuclear force is
sufficiently weakened by distance that it is nearly on a parity with the
Coulumb force that is acting to push the protons apart.  Later in the same
article the authors state that:

"Cluster radioactivity was only one triumph of the two-center shell model.
Another was the prediction of cold fission. In this newly discovered
process, a nucleus splits into two "unexcited" nuclei. More specifically,
nucleons that form a low-energy state of one nucleus can rearrange
themselves to form the low-energy states of two new nuclei. Unlike the
ordinary (hot) process, the energy released in cold fission does not excite
the emitted nuclei into high-energy states. The nuclear fragments from cold
fission are therefore more spherical and less elongated than the nuclear
fragments from ordinary fission. According to the two-center shell model, a
nucleus that is a candidate for ordinary fission has a small chance of
undergoing cold fission instead."

So we have a possible mechanism for the cold splitting of an atomic nucleus.
We still need a mechanism for how this splitting can be driven by alchemy or
chemistry.  We find this mechanism in the connection that has been
established between the superdeformed nucleus and Cooper paired electrons.  

On November 18, in a note to the Alchemy Academic forum, I quoted from a
paper by a gentleman named Gary titled "Paranormal Observations of ORMEs
Atomic Structure". In this paper Gary discussed the atomic mechanism of high
spin monoatomic elements.  He claimed that there are funnel shaped areas of
influence for each valence electron and that in monoatomic atoms these
electron funnels pair up and: 

>"their outermost ends (where the chemical bonds form) approach each other.  
>When (and if) the coupling ends of the valence structures come into close 
>enough proximity, they link together in pairs in a specific manner.  In 
>other words, in this superdeformed condition, the atom becomes able to bond 
>to itself, much the same way it would bond to another atom, only more 
>tightly. When this happens, it looks a bit like the atom is "hugging" itself 
>with its multiple valence "arms", all joined together in pairs. It is like 
>when you stick your hands into the opposite sleeve of your coat on a cold day."

According to Gary, this Cooper pairing up comes about because:

>"The spin of the atom centrifugally causes the valence structures to deflect 
>from the normal positions they have as single (monatomic) atoms.  
>Rearrangement of the valence structures into the ORME configuration then 
>occurs, which, once formed, is extremely stable for some elements."  

It appears that most stable monoatomic atoms are in a high spin state with
all of their valence electrons paired up.  (For atoms with odd numbers of
electrons the atoms would have to be at least di-atoms to have all of their
electrons Cooper paired.)

In order to get a metal to release its atomic bonds to itself you must
finely divide the metal, then disolve it in an acid or other solvent in such
a way as to achieve smaller and smaller metallic clusters of the element.
When the elemental atom is finally isolated in a chemical bond that includes
other elements but does not include a direct electron bond with other atoms
of the same element, it is possible to remove the compounding element from
our original element by exposing it to something that it is more attracted to.  

This leaves the original atom as an isolated monatom. If this monatom is
exposed to the proper amount of heat where it is set spinning by collisions
from other atoms it will move to a high spin state.  As the spin increases,
the valence funnels of the electrons turn back in and pair up with other
valence electrons on the same atom.  This is like a skater starting a spin
with arms outstreached and as she brings her arms in and clasps her hands
above her head, she starts to spin faster.

When all the electron valence funnels are paired up in a single atom or pair
of atoms, the element achieves a new stable monoatomic or di-atomic state
which is distinct from its metallic state.

If you will examine the alchemical processes that purport to bring about
transmutation you can see how this model fits.  

We still need to bring the conciousness of the alchemist into this process.
To do this we need to understand one of the properties of these mono and
di-atomic elements.  The property I am refering to is superconductivity.

Several scientific papers published in the last thirty years have noted that
there is evidence of superconductivity in living creatures.  Three of these
papers are:

Physiological Chemistry and Physics 3 1971
Evidence from Activation Energies for Superconductive Tunneling in
Biological Systems at Physiological Temperatures 
Bio-chemistry laboratory, U.S. Naval Air Development Center, Pennsylvania.
pp.  403-410

Physica Scripta
Vol. 40, 1989
Magnetic Flux Quantization and Josephson Behavior in Living Systems
E. Del Giudice, S. Doglia, M. Milani, C. W. Smith, G. Vitiello
pp. 786-791

Physiological Chemistry and Physics 5, 1973  
Biological Sensitivity to Weak Magnetic Fields Due to Biological 
Superconductive Josephson Junctions
pp. 173-176

In a recent post to me Dr. Pitkanen said:

>The 'wormholes', which provide the suggested mechanism of superconductivity
>turned out to provide a very beatiful working model for EEG and nerve pulse.
>I already told about early version of this model, which was still wrong
>in many respects. If You are interested You can find the model on my 
>homepage. I think that this model gives very strong support for # throat
>(wormhole) BE condensate concept and thus also to the concept of exotic 
>atom,electronic alchemy  and  super conductivity,too
>although the suggested  mechanism of super conductivity is not numerically
>tested. 

The "wormholes" he is referring to are the same as the valence funnels that
Gary uses in his terminology.  The "exotic atoms" are the monoatomic form of
the platinum group elements.

>The  point is that we have enormous  amount of neurophysiological data 
>and the nervepulse-EEG model gives highly nontrivial predictions as well as 
>new vision  about the role of nerve pulses in information processing. 
>Everything testable.  The dropping of electrons from atomic  to the 'lower' 
>spacetime sheet would indeed be the crucial step leading from chemical to 
>bioevolution.

David Hudson speaks about his observations of magnetic levitation resulting
from superconducting monoatomic elements.  He talks about how each
monoatomic atom is a quantum oscillator resonating at a specific frequency.
According to Hudson, when you have a pile of these monoatomic atoms they
form "a resonance connected, quantum oscillator, resonating in two
dimensions, which just happens to be the definition of superconductor."

Why should we take Hudson's word that his "monoatomic" materials are
superconductors?  Hudson says:

>We actually found that these atoms, in the literature, since we filed our 
>patent, and we filed 11 more patents on the superconducting state of a 
>mini-atom system of the high-spin state.  We found in the published 
>literature in 1989, 1990 and 1991, that the Niels Bohr Institute, that Argon 
>National Laboratories, that Oak Ridge National Laboratories, indeed had 
>confirmed that the very elements that I had filed in my patents do exist in 
>this high-spin state, in the mono atomic form.  And that they do inherently 
>go to that state when they're in the monoatomic form.  They will not go to 
>this state when they're in the diatomic state, but they will go to this 
>state in the monoatomic form.  And the words that they have developed in 
>the scientific community to explain this is the asymmetrical deformed 
>high-spin nuclei.  They have even published papers on the asymmetrically 
>deformed high-spin nuclei, and found that they theoretically should be 
>superconductors.  Because high-spin atoms can pass energy from one high-spin 
>atom to the next with no net loss of energy.

These documents that Hudson is referring to, do indeed contain references
which link superconductivity to Cooper pairing and superdeformation.  This
link, however, is more abtruse than I can clearly follow with my limited
knowledge of the terminology of quantum physics.  I just ran across a
reference to the work of a Dr. Mahanty at the Australian National University
which refers to his claim that: "The electron-electron pair potential
obtained in this approach may be relevant for the formation of Cooper pairs
in both low dimensional and high Tc superconductors.

Regardless of these connections, Hudson's claims that he has observed
superconductivity in his "ORME" materials is a more recent and verifiable
unsubstantiated claim than most of the claims made regarding whether or not
an historical alchemist achieved the Philosopher's Stone.

This rather long digression into superconductivity is, as you may recall, an
attempt to tie the conciousness of the alchemist into the physical
alchemical process.  Hudson claims that: "over 5 percent, by dry matter
weight, of the calves brains and the pigs brains, were rhodium and iridium
in the high-spin state."  If these monoatomic high-spin atoms are this
common in calves and pigs it is probably safe to assume that they are also
present in human brain tissue.

Dr. Pitkanen has proposed several mechanisms of conciousness involving these
"exotic atoms".  What Hudson's and Pitkanen's theories boil down to is that
at least one of the major intercellular communication mechanisms in brain
tissue is related to quantum resonance coupling between superconducting
elements in the body.  Hudson and others claim that increasing the amount of
these monoatomic exotic atoms in the body increase psychic abilility and
trigger or induce kundalini awakening.  (An interview with a person who
claims to have taken Hudson's materials during a forty day fast and
consequently had a kundalini awakening is available on the WhiteGold ftp site.)

I speculate that Hudson's monoatomic materials are not the Philosopher's
Stone, but are precursors on the path to it.  I also speculate that the
psychic or spiritual connections that are established as the result of the
kundalini awakening resulting from ingesting these precursor materials can
be used to intuit the right steps and timing to achieve the Philosopher's Stone.

It may not even be necessary for the achemist to eat these materials since
it is quite likely that monoatomic elements are quite "happy" in a gaseous
form.  According to Hudson, these materials are many times more common in
nature than their metallic forms.  Some observers have reported that these
monoatomic materials leave spring water in a gaseous form, (probably with
water vapor) rather quickly as the water flows away from the spring.  I
expect that this vaporization process would be just as rapid after the
creation or extraction of monoatomic materials in the laboratory.  The
alchemist would then inhale these materials as a normal part of the work.

(I wonder if the biblical dew which dried into manna, the alchemical dew and
the effectiveness of pranayama may also be connected to this phenomena.)

With Kindest Regards,
 
Barry Carter 
<bcarter@igc.apc.org>
Blue Mountain Native Forest Alliance
Voice 541-523-3357
Fax   541-523-9438
 
At this very moment, lawless logging
is destroying the ecosystems which provide
the air we breathe and the water we drink.
 
Insanity is doing the same thing 
and expecting different results.