JAPANESE CORP. VERIFIES WERJEFELT'S OVER-UNITY MAGNETIC BATTERIES
February 15, 1994 - The following release is the latest update from Bert Werjefelt's work on Magnetic Batteries, published in Summer Fall `93 Edition of Electrifying Times, titled "A New Source of power: Magnetic Batteries."
NOTE: We report Bert's work again because David Hudson's work and Bert Werjefelt's work are revolutionary and is necessary to understand in order to appreciate the advanced technology of superconductivity, over-unity, cold fusion and fusion, antigravity and alchemy. The Japanese appreciated this technology and took Bert seriously
Magnetic Battery Prototype Equipment This is to inform you of what has happened since the publication of the Magnetic Battery article in Extraordinary Science (a simplified basic explanation of our discovery, which includes an elementary prototype experimental set up, utilizing some of the basic principles) and your subsequent article in Electrifying Times "A New Source of Power; Magnetic Batteries."
Last year we notified many industry leaders in the U.S., Europe, and Asia of our discovery that energy can he extracted from magnetism. With very few exceptions, we were told that it is "impossible" this "appears to violate the laws of physics."
Regardless of the common disbelieves, I am very pleased to inform you that scientists at Meiji and Waseda universities in Japan and researches with Sumitomo Corporation have now proven out point by successfully extracting substantial energy from magnetism. In a recent visit to our facility. Sumitomo told us this is in all likelihood "the most important discovery this century." We are, of course, very pleased that such prestigious academic institutions and one of Japan's largest and most successful industrial concerns, have now also confirmed our findings.
The abstract of Werjefelt's scientific paper in April June '93 issue of Extraordinary Science reads as follows: "The circumstances under which electricity can be derived directly from magnetic materials magnetic fields are discussed and reviewed in the context of the standard formulations of We conservation law. The possibility of extracting energy in the aforementioned manner is in conflict with this law. However, it is not in conflict with a recognized exception to this law; the third corollary of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. This is demonstrated and thereby confirms the possibility of the development of magnetic batteries magnetically powered electric generators/turbines. An elementary description of the process is provided and described in full. It is disclosed the magnetic batteries can maintain permanent electric circuits at normal temperatures and therefore function as macroscopic high temperature superconductors. It is believed that it can be deduced from the disclosures that the time interval from this discovery to the time of applied tehnology and hardware for everyday use can be very short (on the order of a few years). Because of the simple straightforward nature of ths discovery it can easily be placed into development and production with already available knowledge and technology in a mature field of science and engineering."
It is possible that we are on the brink of being able to directly extract electricity from one of the fundamental forces in nature (gravitation, the strong and the weak nuclear forces, and magnetism). "Electrifying Times interviewed Werjefelt to find out more about this potentially very far reaching discovery.
As Werjefelt points out, this discovery is in direct contradiction to the current formulation of the laws of conservation of mass and energy. However, he says, it is not in contradiction to a little known hut scientifically fully accepted exception to the basic conservation laws. Scientists with impeccable credentials (Nobel Prize winner) involved in research on lasers, masers, microwave technology, and atomic clocks, were instrumental in formulating this exception to the conservation laws, which is referred to as "Negative Absolute Temperature!'. As Werjefelt explains, as early as the 1950s, they had discovered that a crystal of lithium fiuc tide when given a burst of microwave radiation. would emit far more radiation than it received. In other words, in some way the crystals functioned as an amplification mechanism. The subsequent explanation for this phenomena was documented by Norman F. Ramsey, Professor Emeritus of Physics at Harvard University, as a consequence of tile actions of the magnetic movement of two distinct spin systems in the atomic structure of the crystals (This I exception to the Conservation Laws is now accepted and noted in the encyclopedias) In other words, as Werjefelt explains, the magnetic energy inherent to the material (crystal) becomes activated by coupling two distinct magnetic spin systems in the atomic structure and can thereby emit vast amounts of energy far in excess of the input energy to the system (crystal) Dr. Wright in a later June/March 1994 "Extraordinary Science" article questions the magnetic battery His questions and Bert's answers follow. Under construction>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same shaft and is output from the SR "in the same form, less the frictional losses..." this torque then goes into another generator which also has losses, but is mounted on the same shaft. Now, if I have three systems all producing losses, how is this going to give me any FREE energy? Answers: 3,4.5. My response to Dr. Wright on these questions is that he read the "Magnetic Battery" article with more care. It would also help if Dr. Wright would stick to the subject matter arid no bring in his extemporaneous speculations (see 4) that have nothing to do with these principles described in my article. On the question ~3) of shielding," this is accomplished by separation 0 the magnetic effects of the different spin systems from each other This is clearly delineated in the accompanying figures. I do believe this question by Dr. Wright is a valid one and that should have added a sentence or two in the text, to elaborate on this fact because the shielding, or separation, is critical. Bear in mind that the description I base provided is principally for pedagogic purposes. It is only one of very many different geometries for accomplishing this -- like the variations you will find on current- motor arid generator designs, as compared to their textbook equivalents, where descriptions are greatly simplified for the purpose o: explaining the fundamental principles. Question: 6. Please show me the long established theory that requires "nothing less than 100 grams to turn the two coupled systems." That theory is not in any of the thousands of technical and scientific books and articles I have in my, library. - Please show me the formulas which will give me that answer and tell me where they are published. Answers. Again, read my paper and the references (2~?). If the force required to overcome the magnetically induced torque in one spin system is 900 grams and it is the same amount for a second spin system, the how much force is required to turn the two systems when they are coupled together? 1800 grams!!! (You don't need the thousands of reference texts in your library to figure that out it is an atom.) What is unique is that when these spin systems described in the magnetic battery article are coupled together in a certain way, you only require 200 grams to turn the two systems!! Dr Wright seems to have totally missed this fundamental point! Given some thought (and more careful reading!) one will see that this also answers numbers (and many other questions he may have.) As a closing comment, in all fairness to Dr. Wright (and I am sure many others),! do understand his skepticism, and as! men tinned earlier, he is certainly not alone (at least for the time being). The intellectual transition to comprehend that it is possible to extract energy from magnetism is not an easy one because we have all been taught all our lives that it is impossible. Nevertheless, the genie is now out of the bottle. These very important developments will profoundly affect our immediate future, and the future of energy, as we know it today (the Japanese will make sure of that very soon).