Worcester Strike Over: Nurses Vote 358-5!
Nyack Nurses Ratify Contract as Well!

Message from MNA Director of Public Communications:

Yesterday afternoon, at approximately 4:50 p.m., hundreds of nurses from the
St. Vincent Hospital/Worcester Medical Center bargaining unit of the
Massachusetts Nurses Association completed their last ceremonial picket-lap
around Worcester Medical Center and put down their picket signs, officially
ending their historic 49-day strike. The last walk around the building
followed the announcement by St. Vincent Nurses' co-chair Anne Spellane of
the overwhelming vote tally in favor of ratification.

Below is a press release about the new contract and the ratification vote. At
this time, we at the MNA would like to extend our sincere thanks to each and
every nurse, allied health professional, labor union member, politician and
citizen supporter who stood with us, walked with us, wrote letters of support
to and for us. This victory is a victory for all of you who in any way
joined the nurses' in this struggle. We only wish we had a videotape of the
celebration the nurses held last night following the ratification vote. The
joy in the room was palpable, and anyone watching these nurses couldn't help
but be moved by how empowered and unified they are coming out of this
incredible victory.

P R E S S R E L E A S E
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

May 18, 2000
Contact: David Schildmeier - (781) 821-4625 x717 or (508) 426-1655 (Pager)
or 781-249-0430

St. Vincent Hospital RNs Vote to Ratify Three-year Contract with Tenet Ending
49-Day Strike
Vote Ends More Than Two-Year Struggle by RNs to Negotiate Their First
Contract to Improve Working Conditions, Boost Salaries and Provide Voice in
Decisions Around Patient Care

WORCESTER, Mass. - The historic 49-day strike by 615 registered nurses at St.
Vincent Hospital/Worcester Medical Center officially ended today with a vote
of 358 - 5 by the rank and file membership in favor of their first union
contract with Tenet Health Care. The vote follows a dramatic conclusion of
talks at the 51st negotiating session hosted by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy and
Congressman James McGovern on May 11, 2000 in the offices of Sen. Kennedy in
Washington, D.C.

While the nurses' contract contains traditional provisions for seniority and
health insurance benefits, grievance and arbitration procedures, it also
contains a number of provisions the nurses had sought when they first decided
to organize their union-specifically, strong language that gives them a voice
in decisions related to patient care and their nursing practice. The pact,
which will run from Jan. 1, 2000 - Jan. 1, 2003, includes strict limits on
mandatory overtime, provides nurses with a voice in decisions around staffing
and nursing practice issues, calls for the phase out of a controversial flex
time policy, and provides the nurses with a protected voice and binding
arbitration regarding issues related to their move into the new Worcester
Medical Center facility. The contract guarantees a $1.50 per hour raise for
all nurses in the first year of the contract, places nurses on a 13-step
salary scale, and grants a 4% across the board pay hike in the second year of
the contract.

"With this vote, our strike is officially ended and we begin the process of
working with Tenet management to begin a new era in health care at Worcester
Medical Center," said Anne Spellane, co-chair of nurses' bargaining unit.
"This contract was three years in the making, beginning with our campaign to
organize a union at St. Vincent Hospital in 1997, and continuing through the
two-year process to reach this agreement following our successful vote to
establish this union in 1998. Our goal throughout this long process was to
provide nurses with strong and protected voice in all decisions related to
our employment and our nursing practice. This contract guarantees us that
voice."

According to Debra Rigiero, co-chair of the bargaining unit, "The biggest
winner in this long struggle are the patients of St. Vincent Hospital and
Worcester Medical Center, who will now be assured care by registered nurses
with the ability to advocate on their behalf to ensure the highest standards
of nursing practice."

According to Julie Pinkham, Director of Labor Relations for the Massachusetts
Nurses Association, which represents the St. Vincent nurses' bargaining unit,
as well as nurses at 85 different health care facilities across the
Commonwealth, "These nurses have not only negotiated a first contract, they
have negotiated an incredibly strong first contract. This agreement measures
up to the standards of any of our seasoned contracts. Their success in these
negotiations is a direct result to the courage of these nurses and their
willingness to make the ultimate sacrifice to achieve their goals. In
particular, the language surrounding this issue of mandatory overtime should
be a flash point for nurses across the state and country - this language
should be a minimum standard for all nurses and the patients they care for.
Below is a summary of key provisions of the contract:

Mandatory Overtime

The hospital, which had been insisting on the need for the right to be able
to mandate 16-hour shifts since the strike began on March 31, 2000, agreed on
May 11 to the strict limits on mandatory overtime sought by the nurses. The
overtime language in the new contract limits the amount of mandatory overtime
assigned to a nurse to no more than 4 hours, and limits the amount of times a
nurse can be assigned overtime to 8 times per year (twice each quarter).

Most important of all, the mandatory overtime language includes a landmark
provision, which grants every nurse the right to refuse a mandatory overtime
assignment if he or she feels to fatigued or ill to work safely. While this
right has been granted to nurses through an arbitration decision at another
hospital and may be the implicit right of nurses under their nursing license,
to our knowledge, this is the first contract in the country to include
language that explicitly grants nurses the right to refuse mandatory overtime
under such circumstances.

The language calls upon the hospital to exercise its best effort to maintain
full staffing in order to prevent the need for mandatory overtime, and it
requires the hospital to carefully document each and every instance of
mandatory overtime, and to review those occurrences with a staffing committee
made up of unionized nurses and management. The goal of this process is to
limit the use of mandatory overtime and develop solutions to correct
conditions, such as inadequate staffing, that contribute to it. If the two
sides cannot agree on problems that arise, the language calls for the issues
to be presented for expedited arbitration.

"Our biggest concern was that this hospital would use mandatory overtime as a
mechanism to staff the facility," said Sandy Ellis, member of the negotiating
team and a spokesperson for the nurses' bargaining unit. "This language not
only provides strict limits on the amount of overtime assigned, but also
provides a rigorous process for ensuring that management address underlying
staffing issues that cause mandatory overtime."

Safe Staffing Language

To address the nurses' long-term concerns about nurse staffing levels under
Tenet management, the new contract includes language that provides nurses
with a voice in staffing decisions and the power to question unsafe staffing
practices.

The contract states that "the hospital will ensure safe registered nurse
staffing levels on all shifts within each patient care area." It also
establishes a staffing committee made up of union nurses and hospital
managers who will meet on a monthly basis to review staffing issues. This
committee has the power to make recommendations on staffing issues to the
Vice President of Clinical Services. If the nurses believe the hospital is
not meeting its mandate to ensure safe registered nurse staffing levels, the
nurses will have the right to take their concerns to an independent third
party through the contract's grievance and arbitration procedures.

Protections Regarding Inappropriate "Floating"

"Floating" is a term that refers to a process of moving nurses from unit to
unit to cover for staffing shortages in a particular area. As hospitals cut
back their staffing levels, many have engaged in inappropriate floating
practices where nurses are shifted to floors or departments without proper
orientation, or are assigned patients for whom they lack the skills or
experience to provide adequate care.

The St. Vincent Hospital nurses' contract regulates floating by ensuring that
nurses are properly oriented to the floor they are assigned when floated. It
also gives the nurse the right to refuse sole responsibility for a patient
assignment that he/she feels unprepared to properly care for that patient.

Delegation to Unlicensed Personnel

The contract includes specific protections the nurses sought to prevent them
from having to delegate nursing activities to unlicensed assistive personnel
(UAP). As hospitals have become more short staffed, many administrators have
attempted to deliver nursing care by replacing nurses with unlicensed
personnel and assigning those personnel duties traditionally performed by
nurses. These practices have met with strong opposition from the nursing
community in recent years. With the prospect of a looming nursing shortage,
the danger exists that these practices would be employed in lieu of
recruiting needed nursing staff.

The nurses have successfully negotiated a provision governing the "delegation
of nursing activities," which gives the nurse the power to decide if, when
and to whom they will delegate any nursing activity. This language, which has
been included in a number of MNA contracts in recent years, guarantees
patients that only nurses will decide how their care is delivered, as well as
provides a roadblock to administration attempts to implement staffing plans
that replace registered nurses with lesser qualified caregivers.

"Taken together, our staffing, mandatory overtime, floating and delegation
provisions provide the nurses of St. Vincent Hospital with a series of
protections that allow them to protect the integrity of their practice and
take steps to ensure our patients access to appropriate nursing care," said
Rigiero.

Salary and Health Insurance Benefits

The contract guarantees a $1.50 per hour raise for all nurses in the first
year of the contract, places nurses on a 13-step salary scale, and grants a
4% across-the-board pay hike in the second year of the contract. The nurses'
salary scale will be frozen for the first two years of the contract, but in
the third year, nurses will begin to advance to the next step on the scale,
granting them an additional 3% increase. Also in the third year, an
additional 14th step will be added to the scale. The contract calls for a
salary re-opener 60 days prior to the end of the contract's third year to
negotiate an additional salary increase for the third year of the contract.

To help increase the pool of per diem nurses at the facility (a key to
preventing mandatory overtime), the contract raises the per diem rate paid to
nurses to make it competitive with area hospitals. Specifically, the contract
allows Tenet to offer per diems rates up to 5% higher than those offered at
UMass/Memorial Health Care.

The contract calls for the hospital to provide nurses with access to its
flexible benefits program, which includes access to its health and dental
insurance plans, with Tenet picking up 90 % of the premiums in the first
year, 85% in the second year and 80% in the third year. Nurses who choose to,
may also be eligible to access disability and life insurance paid for by the
hospital.

The contract also offers all nurses $25,000 of insurance coverage for
work-related occurrence of HIV and Hepatitis C.

Protection on Issues Related to Move to Worcester Medical Center

As the nurses were preparing to strike, the hospital was making plans to move
most of its patient care services from the St. Vincent Hospital facility to
the newly built $215 million Worcester Medical Center. The hospital actually
moved its operations two days after the strike began on April 3, 2000.
Throughout the two-year process of negotiating their contract, the nurses had
been seeking information from Tenet concerning the working conditions for the
nurses in the new facility. Tenet's failure to provide that information was
the subject of unfair labor practice charges filed by the union, and
developing a process to resolve issues related to the move has remained a
sticking point to the negotiations.

The nurses' contract provides both sides with a 60-day period to negotiate
these issues, after the nurses have returned to work. In the event that the
nurses and management fail to reach agreement on any issues in that period,
the unresolved issues shall be submitted to binding arbitration.

Back-to-Work Agreement

The contract provides a process to govern the return to work of the striking
nurses. Under the agreement, the parties agree to begin immediate
negotiations over issues concerning the nurses' return to work, returning all
the striking nurses back to their positions prior to June 11, 2000.

The hospital also agreed to pay the nurses' costs for health and dental
insurance benefits, which had been cut once the strike began.

"The entire community should share in this celebration, and be proud of what
we have accomplished through this process," Ellis said. "The nurses owe a
huge debt of gratitude to our Mayor and City Council, to our legislative
delegation, to the entire labor community of greater Worcester, to all the
community groups who joined our cause, and most importantly, to each and
every citizen who honked their horns, flashed their lights, wore a blue
ribbon, visited our picket line, wrote letters to the editor or to Tenet and
donated to our strike fund."

# # #


David Schildmeier
Director of Public Communications
Massachusetts Nurses Association
800-882-2056 x717
508-426-1655 (pager)
dschildmeier@mnarn.org <mailto:dschildmeier@mnarn.org>

------------------------------------------------

NYACK NURSES STRIKE UPDATE

Nyack Strike: Day 151

Contract Settlement Overwhelmingly Ratified! May 30th set as date for return
to work. Further details forthcoming.

Check the hotline at (800) 724-NYRN, Ext. 369 for latest.

------------------------------------------------

For ongoing official news, with links, go to the MNA web site
<
http://www.massnurses.org>.
For archived daily bulletins, with links, go to
<
http://users.rcn.com/wbumpus/worcester.html>.
For information on Nyack strike, go to
<
http://www.nysna.org/news/press00/nyack.htm>.

-------------------------------------------------

Message from Nurse Activist:

In a message dated 5/18/2000 12:24:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
BethERNC@aol.com writes:

<< the nurses will take one last victory lap around
the facility before laying down their picket signs to officially mark the
end
of the strike.
>>

Hello Sandy - I posted this wonderful message for UnionTalkers
(
uniontalk@egroups.com) to read and could not help but wish that every single
nurse in America knew about the courage and tenacity of the St. Vincent
nurses who along with their representatives, the MNA, stood up to the 2nd
largest healthcare organization in this nation, TENET! This was such an
important strike and the outcome was extremely positive. Thanks so very much
for sending me posts that I could pass on to nurse activists on UnionTalk.
Sincerely, Beth E. McGarry, RN,BSN,M.Ed. - Florida RN

---------------------------------------------

Message from ex-Striker:

Dear Sandy. Again, I personally want to Thank you for forwarding all the
great information regarding the SVH strike through cyber space. I do believe
I mixed you up with Sandy Ellis from SVH, thinking it was she who was sending
me all the e-mails. I actually don't have it all figured out yet, but am
assuming it is you, who I did meet one night on the picket line with Sandy
Ellis. The support shown from people like you, and so many people from within
the community, is tremendous. We are so greatful for the support shown from
Worcester's community. Today the contract should be ratified. It will be so
good to resume our positions as RNs within our 'new home'. I don't doubt
we'll all go back with an assortment of feelings. It will be tough... it will
be a challenge. But we'll all go back a heck of alot stronger d/t our
victory, which we help us to settle back into our 'new' work environment. It
is important for us to go back to work with our hearts opened up, to work
with each other, taking care of the patients. That's what it's all about. In
admiration of your support, Jeanne Donahue SVH/WMC RN

--------------------------------------------

Message from Nurse Activist on Cape Cod:

David,

You have done a fabulous job throughout this entire time, sharing updates and
info. Thankyou, thankyou, thankyou! I haven't left the country or gone to
Alaska as I told Sandy, who has also been super w/emails's etc, just
entrenched in housebuilding and the new job, which I love! Am still very
interested in all that is happening. I never realized how effective EMail can
be. While I wasn't able to be there physically, I felt very much connected
through Sandy and your steady communication and was able to contribute in
other ways - sharing the latest developments at SSRNA mtgs, financially by
sending a check and telephonically by calling CEO - Maher and the other man,
whose name I now forget, to add pressure from one more nurse calling to
plead for safe-care and cessation on mandatory o.t. and calls to Sen. Kennedy
and Congressman McGovern to say THANKS for all their work after Ted's trip to
DC. It makes me realize how truly important it is to do whatever we can no
matter how small a part we play to add to the critical mass. Even people who
are bedridden or otherwise unable to "be there" can be part of the change
effecting groundswell. I was able to break away from the Cape to work the
Committee to Improve Health Care table at Dimmock Health Fair last Friday
with Ann Eldridge which was great. Huge crowd/beautiful day. So again, thks
for everything and send my love to the troops tonight. They were an
inspiration to me and I felt a strong commradery towards them when I saw them
jumping and hugging w/glee last Thursday and Friday on t.v. It made me proud
to be part of this assertive nurses group! Sorry to be so longwinded. Have a
blast tonight!

Kathy B

---------------------------------------------

Message from SEIU Local 285 Rank-and-File Activist:

A hearty congratulations to you and all the nurses of St.Vincent's/Worcester
Medical Center for a hard-fought and won victory, Sandy! I think it will
serve as an inspiration not only to local nurses, but nurses around the
country and the world, including the readers of the Akahata Shimbun! ...
In soldarity,
Greg

-----------------------------------------------

Message from 'Mr. Whistleblower' Barry Adams:

Greetings all,

I am sure most of us are consumed right now, but just in case anyone is
looking to jump into another "issue" check out
www.nursesource.org

I think we should be aware that this type of PR strategy is happening as we
all work to address the real reason that existing RNs do not want to work!

It is not because we are not out there. I read this site and feel like it
risks the trust the public has in nurses. They know how bad it is out there.
If we let nursing "leaders" make a statement of the great "opportunities"
nursing has to offer at this point in nursing history, once again the bedside
nurses voice will be strategically left out. Keep your eyes open and ear the
ground!

Barry

------------------------------------------------

Message from Nurse Activist Laura Delaney:

This is the letter I sent to the contact at
www.nursesource.com. Hope you
like. I just couldn't get past the smiling empty eyes of Liddy Dole. Like she
would see nursing as a viable option for herself!!!
Laura

**********************************

Pardon me if this seems cynical, but your web site brings to mind the image
of a group of spiders trying to recruit more flies.

Many of the organizations engaged in this venture are responsible for the
current nursing shortage. A mutant virus did not wipe out the nursing
population. They did not all leave the country to go volunteer in Bosnia.
Those nurses are still among us, they simply refuse to work as nurses any
longer.

Some of your PR bedfellows, particularly the AHA and AONE, are responsible
for the flight of experienced nurses from active practice. I urge you to
consider the causes of the nursing shortage, and not to simply recruit more
"young things" into a very flawed system. I doubt that a dearth of TV ads is
even one of the top 3 causes. Perhaps you could encourage your partners to
look at their own roles in creating the current shortage. I wish you very
good luck in THAT effort.

Sincerely,

Laura L. Delaney RN CS
Boston, MA USA

------------------------------------------------

Article Forwarded by Nurse Activist Catherine DeLorey:

Shortage of nurses in Japan leads to high accident rate

Joe Lamar Tokyo
Japan's biggest nursing union has called on the government to address a
worrying staff shortage that it claims is responsible for the fact that two
in three of its members have filed an accident report in the past year. The
All Japan Prefectural and Municipal Workers Union said that 62.7% of the 5227
nurses it surveyed had made a mistake or reported a near accident. Among the
errors were mix-ups of medicines, dropping patients, and confusing records.
According to the study, almost half of the nurses were unable to follow
hospital guidelines because they were too busy. The survey - announced during
a 600 strong demonstration to mark national nurses day - follows a series of
high profile incidents, some of which have caused deaths. Among the most
recent was the death of a patient with cancer earlier this year after he was
given eight times the prescribed dose of his medication. The nurses union
said that the high number of incident and accident reports was a consequence
of the shortage of nurses. "Although the ideal is to have a nurse tend two or
three patients at a time, the reality is that nurses in Tokyo are tending
four or five patients on average, and at some institutions as many as 20,"
union member Masao Akimoto told reporters. According to Motoko Okumura of the
Japanese Nursing Association, Japan has fewer nurses than in most other
developed countries. She said that there are 55.7 nurses per 10 000
population in Japan, compared with 102.6 in Sweden and 81.4 in the United
States. The ratio is lower in Britain, at 41.5, but the problem is compounded
in Japan because of the large number of beds. Japan has 132 beds per 10 000
people, compared with 45 in the United Kingdom. With Japan's population
ageing faster than any other in the world, the shortage of caregivers
threatens to become more acute. To try to head off a crisis, the government
introduced a new elderly care scheme in April, and the ruling Liberal
Democratic party is still investigating whether to allow more immigration to
top up the nursing profession (25 March, p 825).

--------------------------------------------------------

Yet Another Message from MNA Director of Public Communications:

While the St. Vincent Nurses were taking their ratification vote, other
nurses (including a number of MNA members) in Western Mass were providing
stirring testimony of the plight of nurses and patients under current health
care conditions before a Special Commission on Nursing Practice. The
Commission held the first of six public town meetings in Chicopee yesterday
for nurses to share their experiences of what is like to practice nursing in
today's corporatixed health care environment. There will be five additional
hearings scheduled around the state from now until December in preparation
for the Commission's development of a report to the legislature concerning
possible legislative and regulatory solutions to the ongoing crisis in
nursing/patient care in Massachusetts. The next scheduled hearing will be
held on June 15, 2000 from 3 - 6 p.m. at Montachusett Regional Vocational
Technical School in Fitchburg Below are two nurse articles that resulted from
these hearings. All nurses are encouraged to follow this process and to
visit the MNA web site at
www.massnurses.org <http://www.massnurses.org> for
more information about these hearings. If you've ever wanted the opportunity
to speak out on your concerns for your patients and what is happening to your
profession, this is your opportunity to speak directly to those who can help
make the changes we need to address the problems we face.

Below are two stories that report on the testimony offered at the first
hearing.

Angry nurses detail working conditions

Friday, May 19, 2000
By SUSAN FENELON KERR, Union News

CHICOPEE - To hear the nurses tell it, anyone placing a loved one in a
hospital should ask a key question: How many patients does each nurse care
for?

Local nurses testifying at a public hearing at Elms College yesterday said
some local hospital nurses are expected to care for a minimum of 12 patients
on a shift. A college nursing instructor said she has been at facilities
where there have been two nurses for 38 patients, where nurses arrive before
their shifts and stay late to complete work but are not paid for that extra
time.

The hearing was the first of six to be held around the state by the Special
Commission on Nursing and Nursing Practice. The commission, chaired by State
Rep. Christine E. Canavan, D-Brockton, was formed by the Legislature to
gather information from nurses to guide lawmakers as they consider health
care legislation.

One nurse said she was asked to handle two carts of medications, making her
responsible for 24 patients. When she protested that she could not handle the
distribution without endangering the safety of the patients, she was told to
do the work or leave.

"If I left, I would be considered to be abandoning my patients and my license
would be in jeopardy," she said, describing the dilemma she and other nurses
said they face in their jobs. She asked that her name not be used in the
newspaper for fear of retaliation.

None of the 15 nurses who gave oral testimony yesterday gave the name of
their employer or where they worked. But some said they are considering
leaving the profession and said the public needs to know the conditions at
health care facilities and what is happening to patients.

"Who will be there to take care of me when it's my turn to be sick?" asked
nurse Kathy Glaesner, a registered nurse for 18 years who is considering
leaving nursing practice if she can't find a work environment she can
tolerate. "The only ones left will be the nurses who punch in, pass out
medications and go home," said another nurse.

Elms nursing faculty member Nancy Gilbert described the day of a home care
nurse. "Her beeper is going off, she is talking to a doctor on her cell phone
while trying to drive around Springfield to see 10 patients in one day,"
Gilbert said.

Springfield school nurse supervisor Mary Zamorksi said schools need more
nurses. She described what she said is a typical day for a middle school
nurse. That nurse in an urban district may be responsible for the health of
1,400 children, may distribute 35 to 55 medications to children each day, may
be called to the gym for a broken leg and to the basement for a teacher
having a heart attack, she said. She may also have to visit three or four
other middle schools for which she is responsible, Zamorksi said.

Stephen Mikelis, a nurse at Mercy Hospital, said nurses in hospitals where
there are unions are speaking out against what they believe are unsafe
staffing conditions. At Mercy Hospital, nurses filed 400 reports of unsafe
staffing in 1998 and 1999, he said.

The response from the hospital administration was that the staffing may have
been short, but it was never unsafe, he said.

In Worcester yesterday, nurses at St. Vincent's Hospital voted to end a
six-week strike by accepting a contract with Tenet Healthcare System, a
for-profit company based in Santa Barbara, Calif. Tenet, the nation's
second-largest health-care services group, bought the once-Roman Catholic
hospital in 1997. The nurses went out on strike March 31.

The hospital wanted nurses to agree to work a second shift if necessary,
which would mean a 16-hour shift. The contract approved yesterday says the
nurses can't be forced to work more than 12 hours or required to work more
than two four-hour overtime shifts every three months. Nurses can also refuse
to work the overtime shifts if they feel sick or overly tired.

Material from the Associated Press is included in this report.


Nurses end hospital strike

By The Associated Press

Friday, May 19, 2000 -- Nurses took a jubilant final walk around the
hospital before laying down their picket lines. They called it a ``victory
lap'' to celebrate a vote to end the nearly 7-week-old strike.

The nurses at St. Vincent Hospital in Worcester, Mass., voted 358-5 to end
the walkout, enthusiastically swallowing a diluted form of mandatory
overtime.

``I can't wait to get back there,'' said nurse Debra Rigiero, who was on the
bargaining unit. ``When we go back, it will be a happy place and a good place
to work.''

However, Chief Executive Officer Robert Maher Jr. said the new overtime
system isn't strong enough to ensure enough nursing staff. He said the
hospital plans to employ more nurses on a per-diem basis.

He said it is ``anybody's guess'' if bitterness from the strike will persist.
``Our expectations have been made clear,'' he added. ``We expect everybody in
the building to treat everybody in a respectful way.''

The dispute centered on the insistence of managers on the right to assign
mandatory overtime with pay. Managers said they needed the right to assign a
second mandatory shift to ensure enough staff in emergencies. The nurses said
the hospital was really trying to keep staffing levels too low.

The agreement, reached last week, says nurses can't be forced to work more
than 12 hours or required to work more than two four-hour overtime shifts
every three months. Nurses can also refuse to work the overtime shifts if
they feel sick or overly tired.

The three-year contract gives nurses a $1.50-an-hour raise in the first year.
They take 4 and 3 percent increases in the next two years.

The nurses went on strike March 31 at a very difficult moment for managers.
The hospital was scheduled to move most operations to the new Worcester
Medical Center the next day.

The hospital ultimately carried out that plan with just a two-day delay,
carrying patients in ambulances past picketers to the new, 299-bed complex
nearby. The hospital remained open throughout the strike with replacement
nurses and about 100 others who chose not to join in the strike. The strikers
are now expected to return to jobs at the new hospital home by June 11.

The hospital's 615 nurses are represented by the Massachusetts Nurses
Association, which became the bargaining representative in 1998. It was the
first strike of registered nurses in Massachusetts in 14 years and the first
nursing contract the hospital negotiated with a union.

St. Vincent is one of about 120 hospitals run by Tenet Healthcare System, a
for-profit company based in Santa Barbara, Calif. Tenet, the nation's
second-largest health-care services group, bought the once Roman Catholic
hospital in 1997.

Earlier Thursday, nurses pleaded with state legislators to adopt laws
guaranteeing minimum staffing levels at hospitals, nursing homes and
elsewhere. The nurses were testifying at Elms College in Chicopee at the
first public hearing of the Massachusetts Legislature's Special Commission on
Nursing.

Nurse Mary Powers blamed for-profit management for some of the difficult
conditions for nurses and patients. She also lamented cost-cutting by
insurers and federally funded Medicare.

``Since health care became a business, the care in health care has become
lost,'' she said.

A colleague, Jessica Berger, said she was beaten and choked two years ago by
a psychiatric patient and lost a month of work. She said the only other
staffer on duty was out of earshot inside the locked unit, which had 25
patients.

``I screamed as loudly as I could, but no one was around to help me,'' she
said.

Powers said lawmakers should adopt a bill sponsored by Rep. Christine Canavan
(D-Brockton), the co-chair of the commission and a registered nurse, to
assure minimum staffing levels. Berger said every unit should carry a
mandated minimum of five workers.

The 10-member commission is expected to hold up to six hearings by December
and report back to the Legislature. It may propose new legislation.

© 2000 UNION-NEWS. Used with permission.

David Schildmeier
Director of Public Communications
Massachusetts Nurses Association
800-882-2056 x717
508-426-1655 (pager)
dschildmeier@mnarn.org <mailto:dschildmeier@mnarn.org>

-------------------------------------------------

Strike ends as nurses ratify pact
Jubilant nurses ratify pact

Friday, May 19, 2000

By Jim Bodor, Telegram & Gazette Staff

WORCESTER-- Worcester Medical Center nurses yesterday ratified a contract
settlement by a vote of 358-5, officially concluding their strike of 49 days.
The vote outcome was no surprise to union members or hospital officials.
Nurses celebrated loudly on May 11 after they reached a tentative agreement
with hospital officials during a surprise meeting in the Washington, D.C.,
office of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy.
Yesterday, they celebrated even louder as the tentative agreement became
official with the vote. After the results were announced, the nurses circled
the medical center one last time, and then put down their signs to mark the
end of the contentious strike.
"This is a great victory for patients and nurses, and working people
everywhere," said Sandy A. Ellis, a member of the nurses' negotiating team.
"We can now go back into the hospital with our heads held high and with the
protection of a great contract."
Nurses who voted yesterday said they are eager to put the strike behind
them and return to work.
"I'm happy that it's all over," said Anne M. Hyland, still sunburned
from picketing. "I think it really came out favorable to both sides, and now
I think everybody's just excited to get back to work."
The nurses will return to work in groups, from June 1 to June 11. The
nurses and hospital officials will begin early next week to determine a
return schedule for each unit of nurses.
Most of the roughly 600 nurses will go to work at the new medical
center, which replaced St. Vincent Hospital April 3. About 30 nurses will
return to St. Vincent Hospital to work in a psychiatric wing that remains
there.
"We achieved what we wanted to achieve, which was to get the strike
settled and to try to bring the entire team back together to get fully
functional and show off this fine facility," said Robert E. Maher Jr.,
president and chief executive officer of the medical center and St. Vincent
Hospital.
He said he expects the nurses who struck and those who did not to work
together without incident.
"The people here really want it to work well," he said. "The majority of
people recognize it's critical to put the past behind us."
The three-year contract is the first between the nurses and Tenet
Healthcare Corp. of Santa Barbara, Calif., which owns both hospitals.
Highlights of the contract include:

.A four-hour limit on overtime. The hospital has the right to ask nurses to
work up to four hours of overtime per shift, no more than eight times per
year. Nurses may refuse that overtime because of illness or fatigue.

.Safe staffing levels. The contract states that "the hospital will ensure
safe registered nurse staffing levels on all shifts within each patient care
area." The clause gives nurses the right to file a grievance if they believe
the hospital is not doing its best to maintain safe staffing levels.

.Enhanced nursing rights. The contract allows nurses who are moved to an
unfamiliar unit to decline to care for patients if a nurse believes he or she
lacks the skills to provide such care. Nurses also have the right to refuse
to delegate patients to unlicensed medical assistants.

.Salary increases. Nurses will receive a $1.50 per hour raise in the first
year of the contract, followed by a 4 percent per hour increase in the second
year. Nurses will not move up the salary scale steps, however, during the
first two years of the contract. In the third year, they will all move up a
step, which is equal to a 3 percent raise.
In the first year, the pay scale for staff nurses will range from $18.25
per hour to $28.67 per hour. The scale for clinical specialists and nurse
educators will range from $19.80 per hour to $30.96 per hour. In the second
year, those steps will each increase by 4 percent.

.The right to negotiate move-related issues. For 60 days after they return to
work, nurses can negotiate issues related to the move from St. Vincent
Hospital to the medical center. Unresolved issues will go to binding
arbitration.

.The withdrawal of all labor complaints. Under the contract, the nurses union
has agreed to withdraw all labor complaints before the National Labor
Relations Board. The contract also contains a no-strike clause that prohibits
the nurses from striking during the life of the contract. That clause also
prohibits the hospital from locking out any union members. The contract
expires Jan. 1, 2003.
The Department of Public Health continues to monitor care at the medical
center, and will do so until the nurses have returned to work, said DPH
spokeswoman Roseanne Pawelec.
Days before the contract settlement was reached, the department
conducted a lengthy survey of operations at the hospital. A final report of
those findings should be delivered to the hospital early next week, according
to Ms. Pawelec.
The hospital will have 10 days to respond to those findings if
necessary, she said. After that, the findings will be made public, she said.

© 2000 Worcester Telegram & Gazette

Previous Worcester Strike Bulletins:


Return to the Union Web Services home page